I’m very sorry for your loss. That was a kind interaction with Lady C. I hope you are okay Xx
I’m very sorry for your loss. That was a kind interaction with Lady C. I hope you are okay XxI lost my Mum a couple of weeks ago and she too, was a staunch royalist but her views were very different with KC.. We used to watch Dan w and lady c and then speak on the phone about it!! She would have been heartbroken if this is true. I also just wanted to put it out there that, whatever your opinion - Lady C is one of the most gracious people I’ve ever met! I had tickets for her ball for tomorrow and can’t bear to go; notwithstanding the fact my gown is still on the tailors dummy in my mums sewing room - I contacted her team to explain and she offered me a full refund and her sympathies. I’ve asked her to gift the tickets on and when I mentioned table placement etc she said to not be concerned.
I miss Queen Elizabeth.
I think if they visit with the Flatties, they'll hide at a royal residence away from view. Hence the alleged KC offer. They'll hide the Flatpacks and say they came over just like for the Platinum Jubilee, maybe with Snakebite to mind them and explain who's looking after them while the Ho struts her stuff.
BIB your postAll these hospitals are using Epic for medical records and ordering tests. I used it when working. It wasn’t that difficult to get into patient files. I would hope that in the subsequent time, even more safeguards were instituted, but in theory what you were looking at could be linked to you purely from your log in.
At the time, it also occurred to me that any ancillary personnel working at the hospital could be accused of trying to sell information. Anyone from the X-ray techs,
lab techs, housekeeping staff to the dietary etc. would have a fair idea about what was keeping you in the hospital. It would not have to be the nursing staff.
On the whole, however Sussex family trip turns out, Harry will spin it to his advantage. I see The King and PoW in a damned if you do or damned if you don’t position with Harry because that is exactly what he wants. He is cunning and manipulative. If they stay at a royal residence they are protected, but when they step off the grounds, then what? There is no reason why he needs any more protection than his aunt or uncles going out and about daily. life. Harry will complain no matter what.
This is where the Queen went wrong with Fergie. She should have bought a house for them to live in, not give her the money to buy one.If it were me, I would purchase the kind of property in California that Twerkle would give both H-Bombs nuts for.
It would remain property of the crown so utilities, taxes etc. and any maintenance work, remodelling etc. would be approved, organised and paid for by the Crown.
That way, the Harkles have somewhere to live without any cost to themselves. Everything else, they pay for.
The Crown wins by having an investment property, the Harkles win because a huge expense is taken from them and everybody else wins because Twerkle can't divorce H-Bomb without losing her dream home
Stoats, snakebites, Chuck, it’s like a Tim Burton reimagining of Wind in the Willows.BIB your post
"If they stay at a royal residence they are protected.."
If the family stays at a royal residence, TRF won't be protected and will be dangerously exposed. Who exactly will Chuck be housing? The Stoats, 2 child actors and Snakebite, or the two Stoats pretending that the children and Snakebite are with them?
Will KC say the "grandchildren" are there and he's happy to see them like at the PJ with Cam? He knows they're not his grandchildren, so is he going to pretend they are? Follow through with the scam BP set in motion when the Ho produced Fake Ffarkke then Flatpack 2?
For his own sake Chuck should call this off, maybe fall ill. It's insane and dangerous, and I sometimes think he has no idea what he's doing.
I've seen that person spamming other posts a lot. Maybe it's Guest Speaker with another alias.Anyone on X can see someone called 'mya' going bonkers over this Sun tweet. She goes on and on!
Wasn’t someone called ‘Myra’ supposed to be Smeg at one time. Has she changed her name by dropping the ‘r’? So saying this, I don’t have X so not sure what this poster is saying about the Sun, just presuming it’s something bad.Anyone on X can see someone called 'mya' going bonkers over this Sun tweet. She goes on and on!
I doubt KC will be serving up jam in a wrap washed down with Ribena at his backyard dinners! Pretend all you want Megsie, you ain’t got an invitation to anything.
"People won't put up with this" "If he let's his traitorous son back in to the fold that will be the final straw "If KC agrees to see them they could pull it off. They won't be able to bring child actors or cardboard cut-outs to public events, and not even the most ardent Sussex Squaddie could defend an inflatable Prince Ffarke.
With KC's cooperation they could pretend they're all staying at a secure and private Palace so that he can see his "grandchildren", who the press says he wants to get to know. It could be done, and they did it for the Platinum Jubilee so there's a precedent of Palace cooperation.
I can't condone this suggestion. It's harsh and cruel.I remember having to let him indoors know that the long weekend away at a horse show really was just that, and that shitland bite marks are scarily similar to adult human bite prints and that King had gotten the fleshy part of my arse…..
that one should have bitten Henry on the arse.
Of course it's not true!That's me done with the monarchy if the news is true. I won't defend them any more at all if H&M are allowed back in as easy as that after their truly disgusting behaviour.
It's not been the same without the late QEII anyway and even the shine has come off her for me since the Andrew revelations.
Glad my gran isn't here to see this, but she will be rolling in her grave today!
It’s no more true than all the otherOf course it's not true!
I'm so sorry to hear about your Mum @Amiyaya, that is no age at allShe was only in her late 60s, bless her.
I’m glad Lady C can be viewed slightly differently now - I know she’s a great divisive force!
mum still not convinced about all this Snarkles staying on royal property thing!
If it is true which I pray it isn’t what a kick in the teeth to all the Working Royals who stayed loyal to the King and took on his duties when he couldn’t do them .Of course it's not true!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?