Harry & Meghan #583 The Uninvited.

PurvyPanda · Thursday at 9:25 AM

Just_me1954 said:
View attachment 4026861 View attachment 4026862

This is more fun and games by two bored layabouts in Montecito.

Personally, I think they announced it yesterday because it was the day of the England match. A day of national pride that she routinely sees fit to shit on from a great height.
That announcement was another opportunity for her to get in some more underhanded digs about this country and its country men and women, and the fact that we rejected her. The majority of us reject her completely, entirely and rightfully, as does the rest of the world, and she should really get used to that, because that’s her future.

Dooley Doo · Thursday at 9:30 AM

Just heard on the news that the hospital staffer wasn't charged because the transaction (purchase) hadn't been completed so they weren't prosecuted.

They were fired.

No mention at all about a hacker.

SunsetBeach · Thursday at 9:34 AM

Just_me1954 said:
View attachment 4026880 View attachment 4026881

Won't she just shut shop/change name again?

Nuttynana · Thursday at 9:49 AM

JAR21 said:
Not our Grifters!

Fuck off you ginger Cunt and take your old,ugly prick magnet with you

ChipDex · Thursday at 9:56 AM

wisebutwild said:
All this talk about the Harkles plus 2 visiting next month ….. this pic is a reminder of the ‘crowds’ that turned out to see Hazno when he visited Nottingham last year. And let’s not forget the ‘crowds’ who turned out to see them in Australia. Granted if the ILBW plus 2 turned up and did a walkabout there would be other people wanting to see them, more out of curiosity than anything else but I honestly can’t see that happening.

She may be brass necked enough to come but their ’kids’ will not ….. a reason for them not coming will be rolled out just before the day. In a way I hope she comes and is booed so loud that they both finally realise that they are no longer welcome in the UK.

JMO but I don’t think KC wants to see them, he already knows it‘s main purpose will be a ‘money begging’ visit. If he was desperate to meet any fictitious grand kids they would have come to some arrangement when him and Camilla were in the USA earlier this year.

View attachment 4026848

BIB

I think she'll come but at the last minute it'll be announced that the Flatties are staying at home. That happened with Invictus in Canada and again with the Australia trip.

There were plenty of comments around yesterday about how, if security is taxpayer-funded, Smeg will have to offer the kids' full faces up on a 'silver platter' if they're out in public at IG events. That would mean media photos she didn't get paid for and/or photos where BP holds the copyright. It would be the final nail in the coffin for any sort of exclusive, lucrative 'reveal' photoshoot. And we know she's still hoping for that.

If you're taking children with Royal titles to the UK or a Realm, and public money is involved, you just can't play the type of stupid rear-view games she's been playing up until now. It's taking the piss.

Bolus · Thursday at 9:59 AM

TheMiceInTheShed said:
I've been trying for years to get Mr Mice to stop paying - we hardly watch TV anyway and when we do it's all of the channels with the really old stuff on - but he's frightened he'll end his twilight years breaking rocks in some convict colony on Van Dieman's Land or summat.

Agree…the thing the licence fee collectors don’t get about us old farts is that:
1. We no longer need to give a toss about our credit rating, debts paid off
2. If they try to enter my property, I’ll set the mutts on them
3. i’m quite willing to sign the non-use declaration on their website since I’ve now stopped watching the live news and am quite happy to simply download shows on catch up. I find the news depressing…everything’s about the orange monster, people blowing things up, idiots being interviewed about things they know nothing about, and the weather which I can see out the window. (Maybe they‘ll start charging window tax again, as they did in the 1600’s.)

Thank goodness for sites like tattle where actual real people gather.

redchicken · Thursday at 10:02 AM

SunsetBeach said:
Its entirely possible that next summer the IG games will also be the first public appearance of Archie and Lily. Markle would want a big event to overshadow and control. Front page news on rags like the DM would be a big win for her. She can't keep them hidden forever, so if they come, I think it will be the beginning of properly merching the kids.

How desperate is she to take the risk though? Will she want to expose them and their childish (because they are children) behaviour in that way? They are still young, don't seem to have much interaction with others and those public functions can be drawn out and a bit boring. Remember the pile-on for Prince Louis at the platinum jubilee celebrations. Will she want the nation dismissing her children as feral, brattish american kids? (No offence intended towards the Americans on this thread, but it's a bit of a trope. Think Mike TV from the Dahl book).

Thalia · Thursday at 10:05 AM

LunaLoon said:
The staff person lost their job, and most likely their professional license (if applicable) and, with this on their record, is now unemployable in their profession. So they didn't get off scot-free, though I agree that criminal charges would be appropriate. I'm wondering if Catherine and William made a strategic decision to not pursue charges in order to minimize the attention given to this breach and to Catherine's condition.

The previous time someone revealed Catherine's medical info, they committed suicide so Catherine is unlikely to want to push this person to the point that they do the same.

Allflightscancelled · Thursday at 10:10 AM

Bolus said:
Agree…the thing the licence fee collectors don’t get about us old farts is that:
1. We no longer need to give a toss about our credit rating, debts paid off
2. If they try to enter my property, I’ll set the mutts on them
3. i’m quite willing to sign the non-use declaration on their website since I’ve now stopped watching the live news and am quite happy to simply download shows on catch up. I find the news depressing…everything’s about the orange monster, people blowing things up, idiots being interviewed about things they know nothing about, and the weather which I can see out the window. (Maybe they‘ll start charging window tax again, as they did in the 1600’s.)

Thank goodness for sites like tattle where actual real people gather.

Just one point to add. They have no legal right at all to enter your home, some of them just pretend they do. In reality they work for Capita, an outsourcing company that often pays very low wages and therefore tends to get monkeys.

They say they might come round, they almost never do but if they arrive on your doorstep just tell them to go away. Or don’t answer in the first place.

Thalia · Thursday at 10:14 AM

Just_me1954 said:
View attachment 4026880 View attachment 4026881

You could say that it's not the first time her spread has got her into a jam...

Allflightscancelled · Thursday at 10:15 AM

Sorry , yet another thing to add . The only thing rhey might catch you out on is use of BBC iPlayer, but I doubt they’d bother.

On topic, I am loving the stories that Smeg may be sitting on a tsunami of unsold red slop. How can she ever have invested so much in so little? Businesswoman? What fools they both are

SuperFlyingPigs · Thursday at 10:29 AM

wisebutwild said:
We‘ve moved on from dollops and smidgens to Smegs calling herself and the Matcha woman ‘gals’ even though both are well into their 40s! Other more suitable names were suggested such as ‘biddys’ or ‘bints’. The ‘chaps’ or ‘ladies’ were names suggested by @One eyebrow raised but I’m not sure either fit the bill!

Besties or bezzas

PurvyPanda · Thursday at 10:33 AM

Dooley Doo said:
Just heard on the news that the hospital staffer wasn't charged because the transaction (purchase) hadn't been completed so they weren't prosecuted.

They were fired.

No mention at all about a hacker.

Where has it come from that it was a hacker, because House in Habit pretty much admitted to this?

Thalia · Thursday at 10:40 AM

PurvyPanda said:
Where has it come from that it was a hacker, because House in Habit pretty much admitted to this?

Maybe it's a buzzword someone in the media used to scare the computer illiterate i.e. 'hacker' is someone who accesses computer records in the same way that 'troll' is someone who criticises online

ChastityDingle · Thursday at 10:41 AM

wisebutwild said:
JMO but I don’t think KC wants to see them, he already knows it‘s main purpose will be a ‘money begging’ visit. If he was desperate to meet any fictitious grand kids they would have come to some arrangement when him and Camilla were in the USA earlier this year.

Exactly. I said similar on the thread around the time of the American visit. I am sure something could have been arranged had Charles actually wished to see them. Fact is - he didn't. That says it all, imo.

Chita · Thursday at 10:43 AM

Just_me1954 said:
View attachment 4026880 View attachment 4026881

Harry & Meghan #584 So, the Princess of Fails is in a jam? Who'd have thunk it..

JAR21 · Thursday at 10:47 AM

PurvyPanda said:
I’m pretty sure it was Jessica Krause also known as House in Habit on Instagram. I took screenshots at the time of her boasting that she had intel on Catherine‘s real illness and that she would be revealing all. She likes dangling carrots, does Jessica. More recently she’s been teasing her IG followers about Meghan‘s past on the yachts (which has never cone to fruition) and people like Dan Wootton have flocked to her watering hole. Bitches.
This woman was instrumental in threatening to reveal Catherine‘s illness, and I believe that’s the reason why Catherine had to come out and do that announcement. That along with the pressure of people joking about her whereabouts and the complete overreaction over the doctored photo on Mother’s Day. Once the announcement came out, Jessica started shitting her pants knowing that things could go legal and immediately started to backtrack, and posted that she was not a journalist, but just a gossip whore (with a substack). I did take screen grabs and I’ve tried to find them on the thread around the time of Kate’s announcement but I just cannot find them. Of course I’m paranoid it’s been deleted but I should’ve asked for it to be put into the media gallery so we had receipts.

This evil self seeking bitch forced Catherine’s hand unduly. Don’t trust a word that comes from Jessica Krauss/House in Habit.

Here you go my dear. I will put the screenshots in the Media Gallery.

Harry and Meghan #484 I am the dragon settler! Hear me snore 💤

Mike didn't trust himself to come any closer to them I don't think. Having been on a rugby tour with Mr T many, many, many years ago I was very proud of his standing back approach. He never was one to shy away from a disagreement.

tattle.life

Harry & Meghan #426 This thread has been digitally enhanced by source

That image of her in the ballgown reminds me of those Scottish Widows ads in the 80s. You know, yer one in the cape who - it is heavily inferred - knocked off her husband and is now massively wealthy and enjoying every minute of her widow hood. I saw it and at first thought, it was a clip...

tattle.life

Harry & Meghan #426 This thread has been digitally enhanced by source

what a fucking bitch. she has no right to do this, I am beyond sick. Give her some peace, I have read that this woman HOUSEINHABIT's is really friendly with Megain's lawyer at Schillings, Jennie something or other..... If she has spilled client information, or spread this around. I hope...

tattle.life

flugella · Thursday at 10:49 AM

Thank you everyone for your kindness. I think this forum may be a vital part of surviving the experience - for a start, it reminds me that I may have issues but I’m not the Harkles

ChastityDingle · Thursday at 10:50 AM

SunsetBeach said:
Someone posted a while ago that Harry is the security threat, hence him being kept at a distance. I think this has the ring of truth about it. Harry banging on about needing security, whereas the reality is that the RF need security to protect them from Markles. He can't be trusted at the best of times, and now he's desperate as things are falling apart around him so he's even more likely to leak information, and invade his families privacy. They must keep all details of KC, and POW health away from him, or it would be all over the press in a minute.

I know others have said it here also, but I recently posted a piece from Reddit that made me stop and think that Harry is now regarded as a security threat, and will forevermore be kept at a distance. I hadn't fully thought it out like that but it makes sense. I'll attach it again, I think it's well written and thought provoking.

PurvyPanda · Thursday at 11:00 AM

JAR21 said:
Here you go my dear. I will put the screenshots in the Media Gallery.

Harry and Meghan #484 I am the dragon settler! Hear me snore 💤

Mike didn't trust himself to come any closer to them I don't think. Having been on a rugby tour with Mr T many, many, many years ago I was very proud of his standing back approach. He never was one to shy away from a disagreement.

tattle.life

Harry & Meghan #426 This thread has been digitally enhanced by source

That image of her in the ballgown reminds me of those Scottish Widows ads in the 80s. You know, yer one in the cape who - it is heavily inferred - knocked off her husband and is now massively wealthy and enjoying every minute of her widow hood. I saw it and at first thought, it was a clip...

tattle.life

Harry & Meghan #426 This thread has been digitally enhanced by source

what a fucking bitch. she has no right to do this, I am beyond sick. Give her some peace, I have read that this woman HOUSEINHABIT's is really friendly with Megain's lawyer at Schillings, Jennie something or other..... If she has spilled client information, or spread this around. I hope...

tattle.life

You’re an absolute legend!xx

Harry & Meghan #583 The Uninvited.

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency