Shirley Manson can duck off too.
Attachments
-
52.1 KB
I notice among the comments one from Graham Linehan, effectively saying "I think the way you do - why don't you like me?"The ever brilliant JKR.
I'll be very surprised if the predicted "mass exodus" takes place.Of course he does. All this handwringing about keeping boys out of girl guiding. Bloody hell, they’ve only had this bizarre ‘trans inclusive’ policy since 2017, compared to 107 years as a girls-only organisation. Less than ten years of infiltration and the whole premise of the organisation is turned on its head due to a regressive ideology.
I wonder what the young girls who attended the 1909 Boy Scout rally at Crystal Palace demanding something just for them would have made of it.
This entire production is going to be shyte from start to finish.More utter crap
View attachment 3940508
Probably trying to ride on the tailcoat of Six with that Dylan or whatever he is calledThis entire production is going to be shyte from start to finish.
I saw that post alright. He got his a handed to him in the replies.I notice among the comments one from Graham Linehan, effectively saying "I think the way you do - why don't you like me?"
More and more I find him a self-pitying misery guts. I was initially impressed and grateful that he was on the side of the angels, but he seems to need to be centre and foremost in everything. There are women working as hard, if not harder, than he is to end this horror, but whenever he is present he takes over and makes it about himself. (He doesn't even seem to be aware that he is doing it. Very male behaviour.)
I think he has set himself up as a Knight in Shining Armour and Protector of Women - but he expects women to be eternally grateful and to fuss round him like broody hens cosseting a single (giant) chick. And as I say - unaware.
I wish he didn't turn everything round to be "All about meeeeee!"![]()
Pretty sure the Tudor court were well bleeping aware of the difference between males & females. The females are the ones who are beheaded and blamed for lack of a male heir and the males are the only important offspring and the ones who cause religious chaos because they fancy someone they aren't married to.More utter crap
View attachment 3940508
Exactly, the chances of a male identifying as a woman then were pretty much non existent. Women were second class to men, pretty much like now in some parts of the world where the men also aren't queuing up to do it.Pretty sure the Tudor court were well bleeping aware of the difference between males & females. The females are the ones who are beheaded and blamed for lack of a male heir and the males are the only important offspring and the ones who cause religious chaos because they fancy someone they aren't married to.
Give me bleeping strength. I know it was several hundred years ago but no, I won't get over it. duck you ITV and duck you Jill Trevellick Casting.
Caster and HIS wife...Caster Semenya looks and comes across like a fine specimen of a man.
If having a DSD renders a man unable to take part in elite sports, that's unfortunate. Maybe the solution would be to include a category in the Paralympics - if it is a known disadvantage (I don't know if it is or not). Or maybe they would qualify for an existing category.Did anyone see Seema Mahotri on Sky news The Wrap during the week? (it used to be called Press Preview, she's the Labour under-secretary for Equalities in Department of Education)
It was the day of the Olympic announcement that Women's category is for biological women - I only caught the end of Mahotri's comments, she was saying that these DSD men will be unable to compete as they will be barred from Women's sports, they can't compete with other men, and how unfair this is for these men.
It seems she actually thinks there is a third sex, that a man with a DSD is neither male or female (or they are both sexes?) so they should compete with women - how can an intelligent woman be this stupid?
The other panelist pointed out it was unfair to women, who have trained for years, to compete with men as they have a biological advantage.
Mahotri has a strange take on biology and equality - won't somebody think of the men!?!![]()
He's fathered children like a man, too.Caster and HIS wife...
View attachment 3940624View attachment 3940625
Posing like a man. Acting like a man.
Why don’t they just say they’re looking for a young-looking teen boy who likes wearing make-up and dresses and goes by the name of Scarlett. From the description, it looks like they want to recruit someone who looks young enough to play a child but can be made to look older as the series progresses.More utter crap
View attachment 3940508
I don't think he fathered them. The article uses she/her.He's fathered children like a man, too.
Reports state that the wife became pregnant by artificial insemination.He's fathered children like a man, too.
How weird that he commented 18hrs ago when she posted that tweet in September last year!I notice among the comments one from Graham Linehan, effectively saying "I think the way you do - why don't you like me?"
More and more I find him a self-pitying misery guts. I was initially impressed and grateful that he was on the side of the angels, but he seems to need to be centre and foremost in everything. There are women working as hard, if not harder, than he is to end this horror, but whenever he is present he takes over and makes it about himself. (He doesn't even seem to be aware that he is doing it. Very male behaviour.)
I think he has set himself up as a Knight in Shining Armour and Protector of Women - but he expects women to be eternally grateful and to fuss round him like broody hens cosseting a single (giant) chick. And as I say - unaware.
I wish he didn't turn everything round to be "All about meeeeee!"![]()
When you can't even watch the CFS without sex being pushed in your face, society has absolutely lost it.Totally agree, especially with the BIB. You can see the gradual creeping of ever more salacious programming on TV: the bid to push the boundaries that little bit further as to what’s shown in regards to sex. And I’m not talking about films or dramas where you would expect to see sex scenes etc as part of the story, but the constant plugging of sex-related reality tv shows and documentaries.
Channel 4 alone has Open House: the Great Sex Experiment’; Virgin Island; Dating Naked UK and Naked Attraction. Not forgetting Naked Education which was aimed at ‘teens and parents’ where a group of young teens (14-16) were exposed to random adults stripping off to ‘show different body types’ as well as mutilated trans-identifying females (I know we discussed it on here at the time). The show aired an hour before the 9pm watershed.
Now I’ve read that in the Chelsea Flower Show (of all places) this year, there’s going to be a sex-themed garden sponsored by the sex toy company, Lovehoney. Just why? The designer is quoted as saying, “Houseplants, much like pleasure, are something we should celebrate openly and abundantly.” Again, the ‘normalisation’ of ‘celebrating’ sex ‘openly and abundantly.’
And they will know who the trans women applicants are as they look like men.More utter crap
View attachment 3940508
We are so ducked, I think it's honestly over for the UK and I hate feeling/saying that. I've tried so hard not to be defeatist but once they got to the kids, we lost.This is someone from the GATE group.