Oh man, I’ve just gone down a rabbit hole researching ‘Steph’ (Stephen) Richards and discovered than before establishing Translucent, he was director of several baby/young kids products companies, one of which he is still active in, but is about to be liquidated.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The Puberty Blocker Clinical trial is set to be debated in parliament later today.
The link to watch is here:
The link to watch is here:
I dread to think what has happened in someone's life to make them this ducked up. All I know is they should not breed.
After the Times article, ‘Steph’ has felt the need to issue a statement in support of himself. I’d be interested to know what his so-called background in medical research is being as he worked in hairdressing and retail.
Who's "we"? Steve and his seven smashed up hard drives which he's desperately trying to dispose off in the nearest lake?
"125 women killed by men"? Would these be adult human female women, Steve, or brick shithouse "women" with willies?
It's Portsmouth I feel sorry for. The home of HMS Victory, Nelson's flagship which saw off Napoleon on his planned invasion of Britain. A glorious history of heroic leaders and brave, resilient sailors and dockyard workers. And now?
Portsmouth saw off an aggressive little French narcissist in a powdered wig only to totally capitulate 220 years later to an aggressive hulking English narcissist in a bad wig.
all those hashtags = #spoiledbrat #enablingparents #doesntstandachance
bleeping sex-pesting students, right there- in writing.
When WILL people wake up??
His extensive research was probably doing patch tests to see if people were allergic to hair dye.
I wish I knew more about the charity sector because the amount of grifters that work in it seems quite high
He says he did medical research but doesn't specify what it was, he could've been part of a group getting paid to try a new hay fever tablet for all we know. Or patch tests
I feel bad for any woman hoping to get some support and talk to other women. We truly can't have anything without some man taking over.
And of course the picture he uses is of all men.
Everyone knows who the men are because they still prioritise them even when they claim they are “women”.
M&S are bleeping gaslighting pricks.
sex-matters.org
M&S warned mixed-sex changing rooms could be unlawful
Sex Matters has written to the senior leadership of Marks & Spencer (M&S) to warn the company that its policy of advertising male and female
sex-matters.org
I've met a few people over the years, who have worked in salaried positions in the charity sector. None of them stood out as being particularly nice or even inherently "charitable" if you know what I mean?
I always remember my aunt talking about large charity organisations. She said that a blind man she knew once told her "if you want to give money to the blind, put it in their hand"
There's a lesson there, I think!
A child can not give consent. They cry out for being their authentic selves, learn to love the body you are born with instead of mutliating it beyond recognition. That child is being used as an experiment for their own needs.
Could that letter be any more patronising? Or dishonest?M&S are bleeping gaslighting pricks.
View attachment 3933511
M&S warned mixed-sex changing rooms could be unlawful
Sex Matters has written to the senior leadership of Marks & Spencer (M&S) to warn the company that its policy of advertising male and female
View attachment 3933508
guys!
I love that gif.
(and enjoy the movie it is from despite it being ridiculously stupid - talking dogs voiced by Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton)
Looking at this logically - even if you believe the trans nonsense. Statistically what are the odds that two trans identified women - already a tiny minority - have a "trans" kid? Surely even the most ardent supporter of this ideology must realise that the chances of this happening is infinitesimally small and that there may be something else going on.
Exactly the whole scenario is one huge red flag!
I work alongside charities and often refer service users to them. Imo, and experience, the majority of people who work in that sector are cutthroat and would sell their own grandmother to get ahead. In general (and again, only in my experience) the people 'on the ground ' delivering the service are brilliant. They genuinely care and are dedicated. Start to get to middle management and it becomes a whole different type of person. Charity sector at that rank is extremely well paid and so attracts people who are not generally altruistic nor do they care about the type of person/animal their charity helps. People on £100k + who openly slur the young adults they are supposed to represent is something I come up against constantly. It is very upsetting and I have had my eyes opened to the entire charity industry.
- Status