Continue discussions here.
Also mentions that they are monitoring the far-right groups but that's hardly a surprise as they possibly fall under anti-terrorismJenrick was responding to a question from Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael, who had challenged him to provide evidence for his claim that lawyers were abusing the law.
The minister did not do so, but said: “We are monitoring the activities, as it so happens, of a small number of legal practitioners, but it is not appropriate for me to discuss that here.”
They'd be of interest to Prevent, right? Although I wonder how fit for purpose that org is when nothing seems to ever improve.Human rights lawyers are being ‘monitored’ by government, minister admits | openDemocracy
Also mentions that they are monitoring the far-right groups but that's hardly a surprise as they possibly fall under anti-terrorism
I think they'd be of interest to all branches of the anti-terrorism strategy. I know there was some talk a few weeks ago when something or other got updated to focus more on the far-right and it seemed to be controversial for some reasonThey'd be of interest to Prevent, right? Although I wonder how fit for purpose that org is when nothing seems to ever improve.
There's already a questionnaire some of them receive with a deadline. Most don't seem to get returned because people don't know how to fill it out, and it's generally recommended to wait for a lawyer to do it with you and an interpreterRishi Sunak set to launch crackdown on asylum seeker backlog with 20-day questionnaire
A leaked letter from the Home Office reveals claims for asylum will be invalidated if the applicants - some who speak little or no English - fail to fill in the form within the time limit.www.google.com
I wonder what questions they'll ask. And considering not all asylum seekers speak English, this looks like a way to quickly and potentially unfairly work against certain groups of people.
It also conveniently takes the responsibility off the government because they may just refuse people on this flimsy basis.
"The usual security and criminal checks will still be conducted and biometrics taken, but, for the first time, there will be no face-to-face interviews, say officials."Allowing 12,000 immigrants to claim asylum here without proper checks and interviews is going to be a disaster. It won’t effect those like Rishi or Suella but the everyday people.
I don’t know if I trust them to carry this out - the whole process has become a shambles"The usual security and criminal checks will still be conducted and biometrics taken, but, for the first time, there will be no face-to-face interviews, say officials."
Asylum claims for 12,000 to be considered without face-to-face interview
The Home Office is to scrap face-to-face interviews for asylum seekers from five countries.www.bbc.co.uk
Oh fun!these men will probably make their way to the UK to be housed.
There are plenty of British people that would have trouble completing that form.Ending face-to-face interviews could be ‘devastating’ for UK asylum seekers | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian
This has a link to the questions!!
Albanians aren't getting these questionnaires, it's only select nationalities which are very likely to have their claims acceptedI think most of them may understand it they teach English in Albania as far as I know.
I thought as they’re the largest group claiming asylum they would have something in place to fast track them .Albanians aren't getting these questionnaires, it's only select nationalities which are very likely to have their claims accepted
It appears that the government is trying to fast track their claims but they're using interviews to do soI thought as they’re the largest group claiming asylum they would have something in place to fast track them .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?