David Walliams #2

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I reckon it’ll be Jonathan Ross in 2027 - he’s been linked with both of them and always saying the same vile remarks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Mods have requested that initials are not used as it makes the threads confusing to read
Again, I’m not using initials I’m asking the person who did who the initials relate to. Can hardly write their names if I don’t know who they’re referring to can I? 🙄
 
I reckon it’ll be Jonathan Ross in 2027 - he’s been linked with both of them and always saying the same vile remarks
When it was being speculated a couple of weeks ago about Walliams My daug said what about JR. No I said. I think if you when into his home, you would probably find a lot of pornography, but I doubt he’s a nuisance around young women and that he’s possibly faithful to his wife?! Then my daughter reminded me that I have a poor judgment a
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Where is the silhouette? Surely it’s not of the person if a gagging order has been granted
It's definitely not the silhouette of who it is, but the one used is very bald man looking which is unfortunate for one of the ones with some heat on them already 🫣
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Afternoon! Sorry if this has been mentioned and I'm not swooping in to tell everyone how to suck eggs but the press often lead with a sensational story where they can't name someone then drop the name in the story below which will be completely innocent or unrelated. They're telling you without telling you.

Daily mail headline - another gagging order, next story down - Jonathan Ross
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
duck sake I’m glad more and more is coming out but it’s been a bloody onslaught hasn’t it, no time to collect your thoughts before you have to worry about the next predator being exposed and hearing the horrible details of that. What a rotten industry.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 9
Afternoon! Sorry if this has been mentioned and I'm not swooping in to tell everyone how to suck eggs but the press often lead with a sensational story where they can't name someone then drop the name in the story below which will be completely innocent or unrelated. They're telling you without telling you.

Daily mail headline - another gagging order, next story down - Jonathan Ross
They’ve been dropping his picture around all the other stories for days…very noticeable. The only thing that makes me slightly pause is the fact he’s just put out that personal statement. Surely…surely!!! he wouldn’t be so arrogant to do that while simultaneously setting up a court injunction?! But his name and picture are everywhere right now so my guess is it’s either Noel (🙁) or Johnathan
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 3
I'm glad I have a very dull job in the insurance industry and have no desire to achieve fame and fortune in showbiz. I have two small children and though I wouldn't tread on their dreams, I really hope neither want to be a singer, a dancer, an actor, a DJ or a model or anything of that nature, in such a corrupt world. I wonder if any other industry have so many depraved, perverted and entitled people (mostly men) working in them?
 
I agree with this, but I think it's an issue that needs to be solved with moral and psychological education, not the law.

We have a weird problem in this society where we look to the law to solve all our problems, but actually a lot of issues are moral ones. Laws won't make much difference as to whether manipulation and abuse happens. Educating our youth will.
Well when you can get parents to actually parent, and not try to be best buds, then maybe but at the moment no chance. They go storming down the school if the teachers/head dare try to discipline the entitled little emperors
 
On another thread it was implied that the other person might be Lord Downton. I am sure I read something about him previously. I will try to find it.


Edited to.add he did have an injunction a few years ago. Something to do with using sex workers.
 
If this photo is anything to go on isn’t it Matt Lucas. Surely they couldn’t use the person’s silhouette if there’s even a gagging order?
I don't think it's actually him in the silhouette, but I do think they are being really deliberately open about saying it is him. Probably to end the farce of injunctions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Well when you can get parents to actually parent, and not try to be best buds, then maybe but at the moment no chance. They go storming down the school if the teachers/head dare try to discipline the entitled little emperors
I don't think it's just parents I think it's an entire culture kind of thing.

Our culture lionises the internet, phones and social media way too much. Now don't get me wrong I love me a bit of social media especially TATTLE. But when tik tok trends are driving our entire culture then i think we are teaching the youth the wrong values, we are privileging short termism and attention-seeking behaviour over the inner self, education and perseverance. Our culture in current day rewards narcissism and using other people for one's own ends which is how narc creeps and abusers get to flourish.