I reckon it’ll be Jonathan Ross in 2027 - he’s been linked with both of them and always saying the same vile remarks
Again, I’m not using initials I’m asking the person who did who the initials relate to. Can hardly write their names if I don’t know who they’re referring to can I?Mods have requested that initials are not used as it makes the threads confusing to read
Do you need equity for tv?Yes of course Chris has done voice work and cameos - so likely to be in UK Equity.![]()
When it was being speculated a couple of weeks ago about Walliams My daug said what about JR. No I said. I think if you when into his home, you would probably find a lot of pornography, but I doubt he’s a nuisance around young women and that he’s possibly faithful to his wife?! Then my daughter reminded me that I have a poor judgment aI reckon it’ll be Jonathan Ross in 2027 - he’s been linked with both of them and always saying the same vile remarks
If you go back a couple of pages you’ll find it on here, someone linked it around 9 or 10pm last night!Where is Lucy Beaumont speaking, I have seen the text of what she said but no actual spoken word.
Where is the silhouette? Surely it’s not of the person if a gagging order has been granted
It's definitely not the silhouette of who it is, but the one used is very bald man looking which is unfortunate for one of the ones with some heat on them already 🫣Where is the silhouette? Surely it’s not of the person if a gagging order has been granted
They’ve been dropping his picture around all the other stories for days…very noticeable. The only thing that makes me slightly pause is the fact he’s just put out that personal statement. Surely…surely!!! he wouldn’t be so arrogant to do that while simultaneously setting up a court injunction?! But his name and picture are everywhere right now so my guess is it’s either Noel (Afternoon! Sorry if this has been mentioned and I'm not swooping in to tell everyone how to suck eggs but the press often lead with a sensational story where they can't name someone then drop the name in the story below which will be completely innocent or unrelated. They're telling you without telling you.
Daily mail headline - another gagging order, next story down - Jonathan Ross
Well when you can get parents to actually parent, and not try to be best buds, then maybe but at the moment no chance. They go storming down the school if the teachers/head dare try to discipline the entitled little emperorsI agree with this, but I think it's an issue that needs to be solved with moral and psychological education, not the law.
We have a weird problem in this society where we look to the law to solve all our problems, but actually a lot of issues are moral ones. Laws won't make much difference as to whether manipulation and abuse happens. Educating our youth will.
If this photo is anything to go on isn’t it Matt Lucas. Surely they couldn’t use the person’s silhouette if there’s even a gagging order?
I dunno, some of the Walliams ones looked a lot like him!If this photo is anything to go on isn’t it Matt Lucas. Surely they couldn’t use the person’s silhouette if there’s even a gagging order?
I don't think it's actually him in the silhouette, but I do think they are being really deliberately open about saying it is him. Probably to end the farce of injunctions.If this photo is anything to go on isn’t it Matt Lucas. Surely they couldn’t use the person’s silhouette if there’s even a gagging order?
Is it not likely to be Gregg with two G's Wallace if its a baldy?
I don't think it's just parents I think it's an entire culture kind of thing.Well when you can get parents to actually parent, and not try to be best buds, then maybe but at the moment no chance. They go storming down the school if the teachers/head dare try to discipline the entitled little emperors