It's nothing to do with his narcissistic tendencies (which I don't dispute) but more likely to do with Equity rules; if someone else had already registered the name 'David Williams', then he'd have to choose a different stage name.Bloke's a bleep just for making his stage name Walliams instead of his birth name Williams! That's narcissist enough, making his name quite so unique, for me to dislike him
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
This morherfucker’s in court next week:
Noel Clarke pleads not guilty to sexual offence charges
The former Doctor Who and Kidulthood star appeared at Westminster Magistrates Court on Wednesday.
www.bbc.co.uk
And Westwood’s date is set for January I believe.
I read it was due to Equity that he changed it
Ok fair enough but these statement from him
screams abuser…
“During an interview on The Rubin Report, Fry criticised what he viewed as growing social censorship and content warnings, telling sexual abuse and grape survivors who exhibited self-pity to "grow up," stating that self-pity receives no sympathy.”
Jonathan Ross quote breaking
Didn't know? balls! Why the old joke about Walliam's taking home drunk 15 year old girls then Wossy?
Theres more...
Didn't know? balls! Why the old joke about Walliam's taking home drunk 15 year old girls then Wossy?
Theres more...
Last edited:
So are you insinuating she's only speaking out for financial/personal gain and that you don't believe her account of what she's experienced in the industry? Or is your point that she should have spoken out at the time?
Either way, your post echoes the worst traits of the grape apologists supporting Brand, sad to say.
What are the allegations against Ross, Fry And Fielding
In the Power & Silence Documentary there was reference to how significant Walliams was for HarperCollins.
He was a golden goose.
David Walliams's books accounted for 44% of HarperCollins's children's book sales in the UK in 2018.
_________________________
In 2019 the TV comedian joined a small group of authors – including JK Rowling and Dan Brown – whose writing has earned more than £100m in the UK. In 2022 his publisher, HarperCollins, owned by Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp, announced that Walliams has sold more than 50 million books worldwide. Source New Statesman
He was a golden goose.
David Walliams's books accounted for 44% of HarperCollins's children's book sales in the UK in 2018.
_________________________
In 2019 the TV comedian joined a small group of authors – including JK Rowling and Dan Brown – whose writing has earned more than £100m in the UK. In 2022 his publisher, HarperCollins, owned by Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp, announced that Walliams has sold more than 50 million books worldwide. Source New Statesman
Big age gap - but she was an adult.
She was 14 when they met and 18 when they got married. He was 35 at the time.
She can say all she wants about how it was her who pursued him, but he was still in a position of power and his age makes it even worse.
This isn't aimed at anyone, but please avoid acronyms as it makes posts unreadable for many people.
Talking about JC, JR, NF is difficult to read.
But instead if you say just the surnames Carr, Ross, Fielding etc it's as quick to type out and makes everything much clearer.
Thank you
Talking about JC, JR, NF is difficult to read.
But instead if you say just the surnames Carr, Ross, Fielding etc it's as quick to type out and makes everything much clearer.
Thank you
True and they are mates to this day.
One of the last times I saw Walliams on tv was on This Morning, this year, some months back, flogging his book.
They got past the interview, just. However at the end of the show he had to infiltrate the clothing segment, where he came on in some woman's outfit. What made the producers let him do that is known only to them, but they obviously thought it was funny. It really was not funny, it just went to reaffirm that he was an odd character with dubious comedy values.
Wallliams always had to take it to the next level of weird, tv producers just pandered and indulged him with his odd behaviour, all in the name of being 'funny'.
They got past the interview, just. However at the end of the show he had to infiltrate the clothing segment, where he came on in some woman's outfit. What made the producers let him do that is known only to them, but they obviously thought it was funny. It really was not funny, it just went to reaffirm that he was an odd character with dubious comedy values.
Wallliams always had to take it to the next level of weird, tv producers just pandered and indulged him with his odd behaviour, all in the name of being 'funny'.