Sorry this is referring to the chat a few pages ago about “do we feel bad judging her based on her behaviour in GS in her early 20’s, she may have changed etc”
I think even if you took that away and she hadnt displayed those awful traits, you only have to do a slight dive into her posts and interviews to see how inconsistent she is, and how she uses subjects and bandwagons when they suit her. As many have said, she pulls out the “I’m so sad, I’ve got PMDD” posts and the “all bodies are beautiful even mine with rolls and spots” shite but the next post will be her filtered to high heaven, posing, full glam, pulling that face she thinks is sultry, in an attempt to gain compliments and attention. It’s completely inauthentic. Sure pose a nice pic of yourself if you want, nothing wrong with that, but don’t then lecture us about how we all need to be more accepting of ourselves and criticising the very beauty standards you’re perpetuating with your filtered pics.
the time that really annoyed me was her presenting a programme on thrifted clothes, promoting sustainable fashion etc, the woman has never worn an outfit twice (apart from reusing her wedding dresses). She’d be able to fill a personal landfill with all her clothes and shoes, she’s NEVER ONCE talked about sustainable fashion. But it’s a cash grab so she did it - zero integrity
not to mention all the grifting, constantly take take take, having plenty of money but refusing to pay for anything she can grift.
even if you knew nothing of her GS days, there are plenty of reasons to find her repugnant.
You only need to compare against Charlotte and Holly for example, their behaviour on GS was gross at times but fundamentally they were just young daft girls, they were thick as mince but not mean. And you can see that now bc for the most part they are unproblematic and just get on with their lives.
Vicky is the ultimate try hard pick me girl