Congratulations @Jeeves for naming the thread title and @Jules100 for nominating it - I inserted names, so that non tattlers will be in on the joke as well.
Most Liked Posts from the previous thread:
KyBourbon
VIP Member
Monday at 7:38 PM
Regardless of the derailment or postings of any single member, I think it’s time to circle back and revisit some fundamental observations. This is the reason why most of us are here and continue to stay. I’m sure there’s more than what I’ve summarized…but there’s so much, I’m just recapping some highlights:
Jules100
VIP Member
Monday at 6:50 PM
Just saying, what kind of empty life and blind obedience does someone have to spend 2.5 years of their free time making close to 5,000 posts here on TL just trying to derail and steer the narrative? As opposed to true gossip and hagging?
KyBourbon
VIP Member
Yesterday at 3:31 AM
How everyone who suspected Clara and issued warnings is looking right now…
Jules100
VIP Member
Monday at 4:47 PM
Clara’s account has not been hacked, Clara has not been kidnapped or tortured. The same person that has always used that account continues to do so. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it’s a duck.
Madame de Pompanddoodoo
VIP Member
Today at 1:29 AM
Oh my, can we not get Selmar and FRK in the same room lock the door and then throw away the key. My God they are both so sure that the world owes them the right to a place where they can live rent free, have all their meals provided and then just spend all their time playing with the things that they like to do. The cheek of him to say that he went to lots of chateaux but he chose Bill and Viv’s and then they have the nerve to throw him out. What plonkers they are expecting to have no responsibility but just to be able to pick flowers and dance the night away.
Who on earth are these patreons that have paid them for years now they also need locking up. It’s all madness.
MRShavershamsdress
VIP Member
Monday at 8:12 PM
Regarding the Clara situation, the very best espionage agents and con artists use just enough truth to take control of their subjects/situations. String them along with provable crumbs until you believe the tit they’re serving you is Michelin starred cuisine. I’m not stating unequivocally that the profile is a denizen of the Fannyverse. What I am saying is there was much that didn’t add up and amounted to misdirection. The constant “it’s not about me” refrain. Well duh, that should be obvious as this subforum is about Stephanie Jarvis. The insinuation that Phiip Jannssen is a pedophile while claiming no such was said. Again horseshit! You don’t “remind” someone of the age of consent without that automatically becoming the insinuation. It doesn’t meet the definition of allegation or accusation because “she” didn’t make a claim of specific action. But it was still implied, no doubt “her” intention. To continue denying and deflecting on that subject is a very familiar tactic to tattlers. Smoke and mirrors by any other name. It’s a “did you hear what so and so said about such and such” game. The huffy,” I don’t need to prove my bonafides to anyone, I’ve been here almost from the beginning, my intel is proven” attitude is also deeply suss. It’s long been speculated that there are deep cover flying monkeys here. Every one of us could be a flying monkey. Well, except Jules. I didn’t include Kathy because she is no longer a member, but she’s also no FM. They’ve both put their irl selves out there with honesty. We could, and should, all be looked at with a grain of salt. Clara isn’t Tattle God to be automatically revered no matter the circumstances. Rereading “her” posts creates a strong “she doth protest too much” air around her statements. Also in the rereading it seems “she” on some occasions became offended when the threads veered away from the Fannyverse onto other subjects (laundry anyone). While I can appreciate the early trolls, hags and haters sticking to topic, we’ve also seen doldrums that needed filling. In doing so none of us becomes too bored and wanders off permanently. Lastly, we may all want to see Stephamememe get her comeuppance, but do any of us really believe that if she did we would know about it. Though LaJarvis wouldn’t accept it, she’s small potatoes to the world and most likely wouldn’t even be a 30 second news blip. Unless it was a slow news week. So tattlers don’t rattle, we keep on tattling. Perhaps it is @Clara Burnett who needs reminding tick tock? Tick tock indeed.
Last edited: Monday at 8:23 PM
HalcyonOrganic
VIP Member
Yesterday at 1:10 AM
for God’s sake…. Everyone who’s not a chateau person or a friend of them, raise your hand.
Everyone who hasn’t raised their hand within the next hour is clearly one of them.
Pippin speaks out
Well-known member
Yesterday at 4:58 PM
Come on. Can we get back to being Tattlers and stop the bickering? We have a common interest/purpose... whatever you want to call it. We aren't going to always agree, of course, but there's no need for attacks and insults (and I accept your apology for calling us slow, Dragomiroff and I'm moving on). I would prefer we save the barbs for our target. I'm getting accustomed to just breezing right over a few people in here, which is rather a shame. My other request is that if you can't spill the tea, don't tease. What's the point? It isn't about "us" so withholding info for whatever reason only serves to feed the ego ("I know something you don't and I'm not telling"). I don't think I'm alone in wishing those comments don't get posted. I do like when people post their theories and we can guess all we want about what is going on. There are some incredibly funny people here! Just save the "I definitely know and you don't stuff"--it's not helpful, it adds nothing, and it appears childless, not to mention it is extremely attention-getting behavior. Why try to impress us? Who cares! We don't know each other! Sorry for the rant, but we've just spent a lot of time speculating, damning, coddling, and soothing fellow Tattlers and would hope we can SOON move on. I'll just let myself out now...
I agree let's let the whole Clara discussion be in the previous thread and move on.
Tonight Stephanie will do something stupid again - remember to check the wiki...
Happy Tattling.
Most Liked Posts from the previous thread:
KyBourbon
VIP Member
Monday at 7:38 PM
Regardless of the derailment or postings of any single member, I think it’s time to circle back and revisit some fundamental observations. This is the reason why most of us are here and continue to stay. I’m sure there’s more than what I’ve summarized…but there’s so much, I’m just recapping some highlights:
- Stephanie Jarvis collects about $35,000/month (US) on Patreon alone for the restoration of LaLande, but the actual work completed in no way reflects the money collected.
- Any dissenting questions or opinions made on Stephanie Jarvis’ channel are deleted and the “offender” is silenced. No one is allowed to question what’s happening with the money. If nothing else, Tattle is a place where opinions can be stated and questions asked.
- Stephanie Jarvis has said she would share the accounting of the tax-free Patreon Association but has failed to do so after years of promises.
- Stephanie Jarvis welcomed a volunteer half her age to LaLande (Philip Jansen). After a short while, Stephanie and her “volunteer” initiated an intimate relationship. With limited education and no real prior experience to speak of, her boyfriend volunteer became a paid employee responsible for editing videos and interior decorating. Rather than being a good steward of the money and hiring the best people to work on the chateau, Stephanie is paying an amateur (who she sleeps with).
- An independent source (Selmar) who is intimately familiar with Stephanie Jarvis has confirmed on multiple occasions that sex plays a role in the day-to-day operations of LaLande. Yet another example of how unprofessionally and recklessly Stephanie treats her business.
- Projects continue to go unfinished with excuse after excuse for delays. Including, but not limited to, restoration of the lake, installing the heating system, paneling in the grand salon, restoration of the chapel, tiles for the kitchen backsplash, etc.
- While projects continue to go unfinished, Stephanie Jarvis travels around the globe with her paid boyfriend, Philip Jansen. They go on shopping sprees and spend copious amounts of money on china, porcelain, and furniture that has nothing to do with restoring the structure itself. These trips and shopping sprees take time away from work on the restoration.
- Countless people have rotated through LaLande’s doors, most leaving worse off than when they arrived. This includes Selmar, Michael Petherick, Marie, and Ian the builder (just to name a few).
Jules100
VIP Member
Monday at 6:50 PM
Just saying, what kind of empty life and blind obedience does someone have to spend 2.5 years of their free time making close to 5,000 posts here on TL just trying to derail and steer the narrative? As opposed to true gossip and hagging?
KyBourbon
VIP Member
Yesterday at 3:31 AM
How everyone who suspected Clara and issued warnings is looking right now…
Jules100
VIP Member
Monday at 4:47 PM
Clara’s account has not been hacked, Clara has not been kidnapped or tortured. The same person that has always used that account continues to do so. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it’s a duck.
Madame de Pompanddoodoo
VIP Member
Today at 1:29 AM
Oh my, can we not get Selmar and FRK in the same room lock the door and then throw away the key. My God they are both so sure that the world owes them the right to a place where they can live rent free, have all their meals provided and then just spend all their time playing with the things that they like to do. The cheek of him to say that he went to lots of chateaux but he chose Bill and Viv’s and then they have the nerve to throw him out. What plonkers they are expecting to have no responsibility but just to be able to pick flowers and dance the night away.
Who on earth are these patreons that have paid them for years now they also need locking up. It’s all madness.
MRShavershamsdress
VIP Member
Monday at 8:12 PM
Regarding the Clara situation, the very best espionage agents and con artists use just enough truth to take control of their subjects/situations. String them along with provable crumbs until you believe the tit they’re serving you is Michelin starred cuisine. I’m not stating unequivocally that the profile is a denizen of the Fannyverse. What I am saying is there was much that didn’t add up and amounted to misdirection. The constant “it’s not about me” refrain. Well duh, that should be obvious as this subforum is about Stephanie Jarvis. The insinuation that Phiip Jannssen is a pedophile while claiming no such was said. Again horseshit! You don’t “remind” someone of the age of consent without that automatically becoming the insinuation. It doesn’t meet the definition of allegation or accusation because “she” didn’t make a claim of specific action. But it was still implied, no doubt “her” intention. To continue denying and deflecting on that subject is a very familiar tactic to tattlers. Smoke and mirrors by any other name. It’s a “did you hear what so and so said about such and such” game. The huffy,” I don’t need to prove my bonafides to anyone, I’ve been here almost from the beginning, my intel is proven” attitude is also deeply suss. It’s long been speculated that there are deep cover flying monkeys here. Every one of us could be a flying monkey. Well, except Jules. I didn’t include Kathy because she is no longer a member, but she’s also no FM. They’ve both put their irl selves out there with honesty. We could, and should, all be looked at with a grain of salt. Clara isn’t Tattle God to be automatically revered no matter the circumstances. Rereading “her” posts creates a strong “she doth protest too much” air around her statements. Also in the rereading it seems “she” on some occasions became offended when the threads veered away from the Fannyverse onto other subjects (laundry anyone). While I can appreciate the early trolls, hags and haters sticking to topic, we’ve also seen doldrums that needed filling. In doing so none of us becomes too bored and wanders off permanently. Lastly, we may all want to see Stephamememe get her comeuppance, but do any of us really believe that if she did we would know about it. Though LaJarvis wouldn’t accept it, she’s small potatoes to the world and most likely wouldn’t even be a 30 second news blip. Unless it was a slow news week. So tattlers don’t rattle, we keep on tattling. Perhaps it is @Clara Burnett who needs reminding tick tock? Tick tock indeed.
Last edited: Monday at 8:23 PM
HalcyonOrganic
VIP Member
Yesterday at 1:10 AM
for God’s sake…. Everyone who’s not a chateau person or a friend of them, raise your hand.
Everyone who hasn’t raised their hand within the next hour is clearly one of them.
Pippin speaks out
Well-known member
Yesterday at 4:58 PM
Come on. Can we get back to being Tattlers and stop the bickering? We have a common interest/purpose... whatever you want to call it. We aren't going to always agree, of course, but there's no need for attacks and insults (and I accept your apology for calling us slow, Dragomiroff and I'm moving on). I would prefer we save the barbs for our target. I'm getting accustomed to just breezing right over a few people in here, which is rather a shame. My other request is that if you can't spill the tea, don't tease. What's the point? It isn't about "us" so withholding info for whatever reason only serves to feed the ego ("I know something you don't and I'm not telling"). I don't think I'm alone in wishing those comments don't get posted. I do like when people post their theories and we can guess all we want about what is going on. There are some incredibly funny people here! Just save the "I definitely know and you don't stuff"--it's not helpful, it adds nothing, and it appears childless, not to mention it is extremely attention-getting behavior. Why try to impress us? Who cares! We don't know each other! Sorry for the rant, but we've just spent a lot of time speculating, damning, coddling, and soothing fellow Tattlers and would hope we can SOON move on. I'll just let myself out now...
I agree let's let the whole Clara discussion be in the previous thread and move on.
Tonight Stephanie will do something stupid again - remember to check the wiki...
Happy Tattling.
)
)
