Since the last thread is closed, I’ll write this here. Apologies to start the new thread negatively. Samantha isn’t vulnerable, not behind a keyboard anyway; she’s actually quite dangerous I’d say with the adoration she’s professing for Steph and M! I had no idea she’d commented on Christi’s children, that’s a disgrace. As I hinted at in my video, the vulnerability aspect goes out the window when you behave the way she’s been behaving; of her own doing unless she’s been forced to write those comments and go looking for trouble? This is the consequences of getting involved in adult business online and not safeguarding your public information. I haven’t doxxed her, I’m familiar with the regulations and all information was publicly available. I’m also going to say I believe she was behind the account targeting Gill Sturgeon, Margaret and other accounts who dislike Steph. I don’t have solid proof, but I saw mistakes and errors with not swapping accounts. Some of the things posted on there were vile, and not from the mind of a vulnerable person. If she were my daughter and I’d been unaware what she’d been up to, I’d be furious.
As for the video on L, yes it’s not nice for her; no one went out of their way to gain that information either. It’s all breadcrumbed by her mother who should be ashamed, but won’t be because she thrives off of this. L is no angel online and does not deserve this, however the blame lies with her mother and her choices. Do I agree that L gets laughed at for her misfortune, no. Do I agree that her mother is shown for the vile creature she is, yes. Unfortunately L and M are collateral damage in her quest to portray everything she’s not online.