what years did she go to pegs then??You’re right! I found her 2005 year 9 photo on their website. It’s a decent school, she’s just a crappy person, but we knew that anyway View attachment 1398152
what years did she go to pegs then??You’re right! I found her 2005 year 9 photo on their website. It’s a decent school, she’s just a crappy person, but we knew that anyway View attachment 1398152
It’s so gross and inappropriate. I just don’t understand why she can’t have put them up in her and Mads bedroom?? Like yeah, her kids will probably still see them, but they’re not out in the main area for literally everyone who enters her home to see?QUOTE="ThisGorjuzpiece, post: 10594335, member: 302632"
Cousins over for dinner and fanny and pancakes are on the wall in the background.
And seems even worse if you zoom in / crop the photo.. wholesome family memories at Aunty Soph’s
Totally agreeIt’s so gross and inappropriate. I just don’t understand why she can’t have put them up in her and Mads bedroom?? Like yeah, her kids will probably still see them, but they’re not out in the main area for literally everyone who enters her home to see?
I can appreciate the boobs one for artistic licence but the vag one is really too far. Surely, if you wanted nude pics, you could do it in a non-confronting way? There are so many fine line prints etc out there that actually look nice.I feel like its exposing them to pornography. I know that sounds ridiculous but how else do you describe this fucked up situation. It's not appropriate.
Absolutely, at a stretch (pardon the pun) even if it was a nude lady standing with legs closed and you see the genital area that would be one thing. But spread eagle vadge in kids’ faces and for meals.. no.. borderline child abuse? Something along the lines of exposing children to inappropriate content.I can appreciate the boobs one for artistic licence but the vag one is really too far. Surely, if you wanted nude pics, you could do it in a non-confronting way? There are so many fine line prints etc out there that actually look nice.
She must be at the back because of her extraordinary height! So much better looking before the fillers and fried hair. Those poor girls that had to be in the same grade as her.You’re right! I found her 2005 year 9 photo on their website. It’s a decent school, she’s just a crappy person, but we knew that anyway View attachment 1398152
Those paintings should live in her bedroom or wardrobe, not in the bloody family dining room, unless she plans on putting people off their food, then carry on as you wereQUOTE="ThisGorjuzpiece, post: 10594335, member: 302632" Cousins over for dinner and fanny and pancakes are on the wall in the background.
And seems even worse if you zoom in / crop the photo.. wholesome family memories at Aunty Soph’s
Her filthy stained top was all I could concentrate on and that's really saying something since her face is also mesmerising for all the wrong reasons.Her T shirt is stained. So grubby. All the content lately looks so grubby
I really wish I wasn’t 2 bites into my airport burger meal. Not sure how anyone eats around that table. I love vaginas as much as the next lesbian but the idea that that canvas is actually her makes me want to barffff.Cousins over for dinner and fanny and pancakes are on the wall in the background.
Pretty sure it was yr 11 and 12 only.what years did she go to pegs then??
I agree. As a teacher, if a student comes to me and speaks about seeing anything inappropriate or not age appropriate (which this clearly is not) I would need to report it.Absolutely, at a stretch (pardon the pun) even if it was a nude lady standing with legs closed and you see the genital area that would be one thing. But spread eagle vadge in kids’ faces and for meals.. no.. borderline child abuse? Something along the lines of exposing children to inappropriate content.