Science & Research

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
A thread to discuss any science/research, share scientific journal papers, articles, studies and to generally discuss topics of interest. 🥼🧬🧫🔬🧪

Edit;
Please keep covid vaccine conversation to the relevant thread.
This is not a thread to discuss the pros and cons of a vaccine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 7
Thank you!

I don't have time right now for any in-depth discussion but I'd like to kickstart this thread with one of the best titles I've come across in the literature:

Scientists can sometimes have a sense of humour 👀
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Thank you!

I don't have time right now for any in-depth discussion but I'd like to kickstart this thread with one of the best titles I've come across in the literature:

Scientists can sometimes have a sense of humour 👀
The thread is here for whenever you have the time to share anything. That is an awesome title. 🤣🤓
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I am not a scientist (computer science doesnt count does it?) but do read a fair bit and found this amazing. Saw mention of it on reddit in response to some people who tried to claim some of the newest vaccines developed are gene therapy (?) - so people discussed actual gene therapy. Its incredible.

Edit - I did use the V word here but barely haha (just saw the bit of text on the first post). Hope thats alright 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I am not a scientist (computer science doesnt count does it?) but do read a fair bit and found this amazing. Saw mention of it on reddit in response to some people who tried to claim some of the newest vaccines developed are gene therapy (?) - so people discussed actual gene therapy. Its incredible.

Edit - I did use the V word here but barely haha (just saw the bit of text on the first post). Hope thats alright 😂
Thanks for sharing this - it is very interesting that 48/50 of the children were successfully treated and such treatment is available until a bone marrow donor is found.

Not sure if you have seen the edit on the top of the thread.

This particular study I found fascinating as the sample size is huge: 1,789,728 individuals from 814,806 families.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I'm so happy this thread is here...

I won't go into my background again as it's on the other thread and took a while to type out... but I have spent over a decade working in medical research and have studied it to PhD level (PhD in progress but completed my masters in clinical research) - so guess I am a scientist of sorts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I'm so happy this thread is here...

I won't go into my background again as it's on the other thread and took a while to type out... but I have spent over a decade working in medical research and have studied it to PhD level (PhD in progress but completed my masters in clinical research) - so guess I am a scientist of sorts?
Welcome to the thread! I briefly remember you mentioning your background on one of the thread. Yes I think you can call yourself a scientist of sorts 😌 I so want to do a PhD but don’t know if I can handle the stress for 3 years. 🥴 My background is in research/psychology/neuro but I love to learn about many areas of science.
 
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Welcome to the thread! I briefly remember you mentioning your background on one of the thread. Yes I think you can call yourself a scientist of sorts 😌 I so want to do a PhD but don’t know if I can handle the stress for 3 years. 🥴 My background is in research/psychology/neuro but I love to learn about many areas of science.
yes that’s before the petty comments started 🙄
It will be 6 years for me as I’m doing it alongside work… looking at attitudes towards participation in research and in particular pandemic research, my initial background is also in psychology/neuro
 
Thanks for starting the thread. I shall watch with interest
Feel free to share anything that is of interest to you! 😊

yes that’s before the petty comments started 🙄
It will be 6 years for me as I’m doing it alongside work… looking at attitudes towards participation in research and in particular pandemic research, my initial background is also in psychology/neuro
Such an intersting topic. There must be a lot of hesitation with participation in research due to the sheer amount of misinformation out there! Which areas of psychology/neuro is your initial background in?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I did my undergrad in biochem and my PhD in paleoclimatology so these are where my main interests lie. I'd love to learn and understand more about quantum mechanics though because that stuff is spooky.

This particular study I found fascinating as the sample size is huge: 1,789,728 individuals from 814,806 families.

Yes that's a really impressive sample size and some really interesting data. I thought this point made in the discussion was particularly interesting and a good example of how research can have a positive impact on society:
"In this study, we found that the benefit of immunity (ie, lowered risk of transmission within families) acquired from a single dose was similar to the benefit of immunity from full vaccination or a previous infection. This knowledge may be particularly valuable for low income countries in which most people are unlikely to receive the vaccines in the near future."

Would definitely be interesting to see any results from a similar study in which delta is the dominant variant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Feel free to share anything that is of interest to you! 😊



Such an intersting topic. There must be a lot of hesitation with participation in research due to the sheer amount of misinformation out there! Which areas of psychology/neuro is your initial background in?
i did a lot of really diverse stuff when I first started out but then have been drawn much closer to the psychology of thinking type stuff, particularly in relation to conspiracies, odd beliefs etc, even before all the covid stuff came along! I then worked in medical research management for a number of years but am currently involved in mental health service development so a big change really!
 
I did my undergrad in biochem and my PhD in paleoclimatology so these are where my main interests lie. I'd love to learn and understand more about quantum mechanics though because that stuff is spooky.


Yes that's a really impressive sample size and some really interesting data. I thought this point made in the discussion was particularly interesting and a good example of how research can have a positive impact on society:
"In this study, we found that the benefit of immunity (ie, lowered risk of transmission within families) acquired from a single dose was similar to the benefit of immunity from full vaccination or a previous infection. This knowledge may be particularly valuable for low income countries in which most people are unlikely to receive the vaccines in the near future."

Would definitely be interesting to see any results from a similar study in which delta is the dominant variant.
I’m getting major PhD envy. 😂 I am not very familiar with the the field you did your PhD in. What does it entail?

That particular point you mention is very important especially in countries where vaccine uptake is slow or they are yet to receive many doses. I am constantly on the lookout for comparative studies with the Delta variant since it is more transmissible.

i did a lot of really diverse stuff when I first started out but then have been drawn much closer to the psychology of thinking type stuff, particularly in relation to conspiracies, odd beliefs etc, even before all the covid stuff came along! I then worked in medical research management for a number of years but am currently involved in mental health service development so a big change really!
That’s quite a varied background! I had done some reading into the psychology/behavioural aspect of conspiracy theories. It has become quite relevant in the past couple of years since the pandemic started.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I’m getting major PhD envy. 😂 I am not very familiar with the the field you did your PhD in. What does it entail?
Haha I was sometimes so envious of my friends with proper jobs when I was doing my PhD. It was incredibly tough and lonely at times but I'm glad I persevered. Paleoclimatology is essentially reconstructing prehistoric climates. There are obviously no written records for the majority of Earth's history so we use proxies that have been preserved, which carry climate information e.g. ice cores, speleothems. In my PhD I was analysing the isotopic compositions of various biomarkers found in lake sediments.
 
Haha I was sometimes so envious of my friends with proper jobs when I was doing my PhD. It was incredibly tough and lonely at times but I'm glad I persevered. Paleoclimatology is essentially reconstructing prehistoric climates. There are obviously no written records for the majority of Earth's history so we use proxies that have been preserved, which carry climate information e.g. ice cores, speleothems. In my PhD I was analysing the isotopic compositions of various biomarkers found in lake sediments.
Thanks for taking the time to explain what Paleoclimatology is and what your PhD was on. Very interesting field of work and one I was not very familiar on at all!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Thanks for taking the time to explain what Paleoclimatology is and what your PhD was on. Very interesting field of work and one I was not very familiar on at all!
You're very welcome :D

What are everyone's thoughts on the science that was in the news the other day about Vikings settling in North America years before Columbus got there? I love this interdisciplinary stuff and I find it slightly mind boggling that they've determined an exact year.
 
You're very welcome :D

What are everyone's thoughts on the science that was in the news the other day about Vikings settling in North America years before Columbus got there? I love this interdisciplinary stuff and I find it slightly mind boggling that they've determined an exact year.
This is the first time I have seen this. I don’t know much around the field but found it very interesting that the solar storms were reflected in the annual tree growth rings. To determine a specific year is pretty amazing. 🤯

I think as technology and research evolves in the coming year, we will be learning a lot more about settlements.

I was reading this research about brain 🧠 size reduction occuring in the last 3,000 years due to us socialising more and the emergence of collective intelligence. I believe there are so many areas of our brain we do not use or activate due to advances in technology and life - we do not need to tap into these areas as much or use our brain to the capacity it can be used.


 
Last edited:
I was reading this research about brain 🧠 size reduction occuring in the last 3,000 years due to us socialising more and the emergence of collective intelligence. I believe there are so many areas of our brain we do not use or activate due to advances in technology and life - we do not need to tap into these areas as much or use our brain to the capacity it can be used.


3000 years is such a short amount of time in terms of evolution. That's really quite something! And this made me chuckle: "The brain size reduction in Holocene humans parallels that of domesticated animals, suggesting that humans have self-domesticated by deliberately removing highly aggressive individuals from breeding populations".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Given all of the deleted comments I'm assuming an argument started. That's a shame :(

This is a (pretty long) article about the value of failures in science. It uses Grandmother Cells as an illustrative case, so might appeal to those interested in neuroscience.

The paragraph below particularly resonated with me. The “impact” and “relevance” of research is such a key aspect of securing funding and there is a constant pressure to have "successful" outcomes. I do feel that the system doesn't acknowledge that the majority of your work will have absolutely no beneficial impact on society, but it is still essential work in order to make discoveries that could be significant.

It is one thing to say that science fails and that we should think about the decisive role of failures. It is another to highlight the particular aspects of failure that benefit our concrete dealing with science. Different attitudes toward science from the practitioner to the non-expert are the easiest to situate the lack of understanding of failure’s role in the scientific process. Such divergence of attitudes is apparent when it comes to the status of the scientific method. The scientific method is our most popular characterization and explanation for the success of science. But it has limits when it comes to reality. Being a traditional analytical tool and teaching device, it also paints a problematic picture of science because it never makes explicit the ubiquitous presence and influence of failures at the laboratory bench and modeling board (Medarwar, 1959/1999; Firestein, 2015; Schickore, in review).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1