Same as Arthur. Within months he was dead.It does seem to have happened so very quickly. From meeting to the death of her baby in 10 months. Terrifying.
I agree. Warning signs like telling you what to wear escalate to all-consuming control. And it’s frighteningly common.Really needs to be some type of education on abuse, grooming, love bombing etc. So many women and children could be saved . Just a couple of lesson while doing sex and relationships, telling teens the warning signs
It doesn’t seem random though. The conversation was very much consistently in context.I believe her. My only wobble today is the holding her under water part because it seems an odd thing to say if you haven’t done it? but then again who hasn’t been ridiculously drunk and said random stuff? I don’t know.
I absolutely agree 100%Really needs to be some type of education on abuse, grooming, love bombing etc. So many women and children could be saved . Just a couple of lesson while doing sex and relationships, telling teens the warning signs
Yes, my feelings have been the same and I completely agree that it’s very reasonable to change ones opinion when the facts support this.I’ve followed this thread from early on and It’s frustrating reading the same comments every few posts. To the people who keep asking the same questions, have you read all the transcripts? Because all the details are in there.
I’m sure the guy who’s writing these does a summary every day, perhaps it’s worth catching up on those? I know the transcripts are quite long, it takes me a while to catch up.
I firmly believed FS to be as bad as SB at the beginning I was quite vocal about it on here. Now that I’ve continued reading the transcripts/evidence we’ve been shown I’ve changed my mind. There is nothing wrong with changing your opinion when new facts come into play.
I’m not defending FS but it’s very clear she was in a very absuive relationship. If you speak to any DV survivor who’s got out they all say the same thing, they were controlled and not themselves, infact a shell of themselves. I’ve been through it too.
I was also wondering this...I didn't know if its because KG hasn't got anything substantial to go on and maybe doesnt want to incriminate 'her client' any further, so wants to focus her cross examination based on FS responses to AM.Sorry if this has been answered but does anyone know why AM will be cross examining FS first and then KG?
My son has had loads of stuff over the past few years about consent and also about what healthy relationships look like. I would hope that in this day and age this is standard in schools.Really needs to be some type of education on abuse, grooming, love bombing etc. So many women and children could be saved . Just a couple of lesson while doing sex and relationships, telling teens the warning signs
My opinion has somewhat changed too.I’ve followed this thread from early on and It’s frustrating reading the same comments every few posts. To the people who keep asking the same questions, have you read all the transcripts? Because all the details are in there.
I’m sure the guy who’s writing these does a summary every day, perhaps it’s worth catching up on those? I know the transcripts are quite long, it takes me a while to catch up.
I firmly believed FS to be as bad as SB at the beginning I was quite vocal about it on here. Now that I’ve continued reading the transcripts/evidence we’ve been shown I’ve changed my mind. There is nothing wrong with changing your opinion when new facts come into play.
I’m not defending FS but it’s very clear she was in a very absuive relationship. If you speak to any DV survivor who’s got out they all say the same thing, they were controlled and not themselves, infact a shell of themselves. I’ve been through it too.
Considering how good AM was with SB, it seems abit unfair that KG goes after himI was also wondering this...I didn't know if its because KG hasn't got anything substantial to go on and maybe doesnt want to incriminate 'her client' any further, so wants to focus her cross examination based on FS responses to AM.
I posted yesterday that I'd took valium because I felt unwell. Reading about the case made me feel horrible and there were specific parts of the trial that triggered me yesterday. There was no cheering here on this thread, by me or anyone else. At all. And I said I'd give anything to be a fly on the wall because it was hard to get a full picture through transcripts, I said I wished the trial were televised because we were missing a lot of body language. I'm deaf so maybe I place more importance on non verbal cues than most people. Please don't misrepresent me - you've made it sound like people were having a party here. That absolutely wasn't the case. Don't gaslight me, I won't sit here and let that happen to me ever again.This threads a bit ridiculous..You can’t have an opinion without being accused of knowing them. I was said to know the defendants but I’m simply following like anyone else
I think some people were getting a little over excited yesterday when they were talking about taking medication, cheering and saying they would love to be a fly on the wall. It’s disgusting.
It was a perfect storm.My opinion has somewhat changed too.
I think after engaging with other people here and listening to their point of view I’m more open to seeing how FS may not have felt she had the power to protect Star, and up to a point she may not even have been aware of Star being PHYSICALLY abused.
My first thoughts were ‘if you hated the baby that much, If she was that much of a burden to you then just give her away. To family to social services or whatever’
Now I’m starting to think that actually if SB hadn’t have came into their lives and FS had the continued support of her family everything would have been ok. I honestly think that FS loved Star and wasn’t a bad mum to start with. Just a very young, very inexperienced and very lonely one. She hardly had the best example of a mother herself.
I’m not excusing what she’s done, and it makes me sick to my stomach, but I can see NOW why she may have been blind to what what happening.
She was trying to get away….. she was trying to break away from the relationship there’s no denying that.
Agree with everything you’ve said here. Star would still be alive if SB hadn’t been involvedMy opinion has somewhat changed too.
I think after engaging with other people here and listening to their point of view I’m more open to seeing how FS may not have felt she had the power to protect Star, and up to a point she may not even have been aware of Star being PHYSICALLY abused.
My first thoughts were ‘if you hated the baby that much, If she was that much of a burden to you then just give her away. To family to social services or whatever’
Now I’m starting to think that actually if SB hadn’t have came into their lives and FS had the continued support of her family everything would have been ok. I honestly think that FS loved Star and wasn’t a bad mum to start with. Just a very young, very inexperienced and very lonely one. She hardly had the best example of a mother herself.
I’m not excusing what she’s done, and it makes me sick to my stomach, but I can see NOW why she may have been blind to what what happening.
She was trying to get away….. she was trying to break away from the relationship there’s no denying that.
On KG level, I presume she's just as good.Considering how good AM was with SB, it seems abit unfair that KG goes after him