BarryBaltic
Member
It’s perfectly normal for 2 year olds to sleep in a cot, in a sleeping bag/grobag and of course wear nappies have a dummy etc. He’s 2 not 22!
Same goes for bathing!
Same goes for bathing!
I'm not being funny but who was working harder over the last 6 months?Why couldn't he have spent the morning home with Lachlan which would have been the easier option than sending him swimming with Isla.
We all know she's gonna make him work for the 6 months he missed!
Come on we can Slag Sarah off all we want on here but leave the wee man out of it, it's not on!!Because he really isn’t a very likeable child
hello SarahNo perhaps the uniform logo was a genuine mistake and I dont see her banging on about work infact she keeps it private where she works she just says oh im off to work because SHES OFF TO WORK you wouldnt say Oh im off to work if you wernt off to work and why is her working a bad thing? Her eldest child is at school 5 days during the week and she always plans lots of trips away and activities for the children to do. Isla does Ballet Swimming and Football which is great and she mentioned Lachlan joining in with those as he gets a bit older. For a working Mum to pay out for all those clubs shows she does care and shes letting them learn and explore new things. She is a very busy working parent and always does the best for her children thats clear to see. So just because you are a mother it means youre not allowed to go out to work when you have children? Extremely antiquated view in my opinion!
I know it’s so bizarre, my husbands home from deployment next weekend just honestly can’t imagine any situation of running ahead of the kids to jump into his arms. It’s all about the kids!! I’m actually laughing imaging it, would just never happen. Unless she’s staged it for a photo. But then still, what a great way to spend the first moments back together staging bloody Instagram photos.What an odd photo. Really don’t understand. Did someone take it? Has she put a tripod up? Oh wait kids I’ll just run ahead of you all and try and break your dads back cos that big bag he has isn’t heavy enough.
She didn’t have to accept the money. She literally made a 5 minute video. As the wife of a military man she could've waived her fee to be used elsewhere. Charities have to pay wages & campaigns etc but I find it abhorrent that someone who earns a good wage & has a public platform that she could have volunteered to use would accept money that could’ve been better spent elsewhere. She’s pure greedy.As someone who works for a cancer charity I care a lot about, on a decent enough wage I don’t think this argument makes sense.
Charities spend money on campaigns in order to advertise and take in greater fundraising targets, just like any other business.
Even if she took a payment, they are using her platform and raising more cash by doing so