I've wanted to mention Jessica DeFino for a while. I'm glad there's a narrative like hers out there to counter the Trinny's, Caroline's and Sali's, as well as overdoing it on the skin with huge multi-step skin routines, but something about her rubs me up the wrong way. She has an axe to grind with dermatologists because her treatments didn't work for her, but wants to extrapolate natural=superior out to a universal audience. For me, you can prize my retinoids out of my cold, dead, smooth, acne-free, lifeless hands
Some of the stuff she writes about is total pseudoscience but likes to link to outdated, poorly designed papers because science (example, seed cycling with a paper from 1993). Maybe I'm just too cynical and long in the tooth, but I don't need another woman telling me what my feminism is about.
^^^ Just realised half of what I wrote doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things, I think I'm trying to untangle what makes me
about her. That'll learn me to write without caffeine on board