I know someone exactly like this too. As an older runner I still firmly believe it all comes around in the end. SOME runners can get away with this for longer than most - luck, DNA, who knows…. But in the end without proper recovery and easy sessions, it will catch up with them in the end.
That, OR they are actually just not reaching their potential I suppose and some people are just naturally fast without the structure… but they are rare. In my opinion!
That, OR they are actually just not reaching their potential I suppose and some people are just naturally fast without the structure… but they are rare. In my opinion!
Speaking of Parkrun sandwiches (and yes that term can die in a ditch along with royal flush negative split) I'd love to know how Anna can run one of those with a 21 minute Parkrun in the middle and a 7:30 pace overall for 17 miles despite doing everything wrong.
Outside of the things she can control, the most annoying aspect of her is not having to work for anything. She has no properly structured training. She does no sessions, no speedwork because she gave up on track sessions for being too much like hard graft, and does heavy leg days less than 24 hours before her long run every week. So how does she still improve? I think that's the fastest long run I've seen her post outside of a race. Surely there should be steady deterioration in performance, if not outright injury. It makes no sense to me. Sure, running isn't as you get out what you put in as I'd like to believe, but there should still be basic rules of human physiology that set certain boundaries. Less a comment than a genuine question to those more educated than me - why do some people continue to improve even though they train like morons?