Notaninstamum
Active member
Who would've thought a few weeks ago there would be 10 threads dedicated to Philip bloody Schofield?! 
- Notice
amethyst_unicorn
Chatty Member
I have updated & edited my previous post of 15/2/20 for the benefit of newcomers, apologies for repetitions of earlier info and any missed out for those who've been with the thread quite a while... When looking at this information summary in conjunction with the very detailed tweets and other social media postings that @Rob123 and others posted in the previous thread, as well as other information that has come to light through social media, one can understand why there is a continuing frustration at the seeming lack of response from anyone with any authority to curtail PS and his activities, in addition to the apparent cover up by the removal of comments, tweets, posts etc since his big "reveal".
• This all apparently started last July with a private tweet stating PS had a flat in London where he took young guys and that he had been in a relationship with MM who was a runner on TM. This tweet was made public after PS made his public "outing" on 7/2/20, but the timeline confirms the date of original post.
*PS is gay, apparently a fact known in showbiz circles over the last 30 years. The public, in the main, doesn't care about his sexuality (no homophobia here) - the issue that upsets everyone are the blatant attempts by him, his cohorts and the media corporations backing him to manipulate the public into believing this is a recent personal "discovery" or "revelation", despite its being known in the "business" - both television and journalism - for years. I repeat, No one cares that he's gay. They care about being lied to and being manipulated, particularly if this is any part of an attempt to cover up any other potentially more damaging (perhaps even illegal as well as immoral/unethical) stories and behaviours...
* Another concern is that this "revelation" may or may not be in connection with the rumours of PS being intimate with a much younger (teenage) person, MM, who he may have met at a theatre group he is patron of when MM was aged @ 10 or 11 yrs. He also "friended" MM on social media when he was 15 although there does not appear to be many tweets shared. PS then "mentored" him through "menial" runner work at TM for a number of years after MM had crowdfunded £500 for a move to London as a young teenage adult. MM was then "promoted" to personal assistant, as well as runner, for PS & HW before being moved over to LW in the summer of 2019 after an alleged falling out or break up with PS. Rumours were that MM was apparently sacked by ITV the week just before the big"reveal", but these appear to be unfounded because he was seen on the LW video blog at the NTAs and is still in the LW end credits. MM's Twitter and media accounts, alongside the web page of theatre he attended as a youngster, have disappeared. Further rumours have surfaced that 3 runners, possibly MM and friends, tried to gain entry to the TM box at the NTAs this year to celebrate with PS & HW, but removed on the instructions of PS who did not want menial staff celebrating with the stars. This incident is possiblythe catalyst for the "big reveal".
*PS has been "mentoring" young men at ITV who have been having "issues" with their sexuality for some considerable years, all the time he's allegedly been in a happy heterosexual marriage and it's only recently he claims, over the last couple of years, that he has realised and "struggled" with his own homosexuality. Being gay isn't a virus he contracted from mentoring the young men caught like rabbits in the beam of his celebrity and influence. No, his sudden epiphany and revelation about his sexuality was so dramatic, and it literally was a drama, that everyone could see that this was a public relations exercise in damage limitation. Of what, we do not yet know, but we continue to hope that the truth will out!
*SS (no relation to PS, surname coincidentally the same) ran the 2 Faced theatre that MM attended. SS was a child performer, with PS and has remained friends with him, occasionally appearing on stage with him, on ITV shows and on the cruise liners promoted by PS and his family. Coincidentally, JS also promoted the same cruise liners. SS has socialised with PS and MM, as seen in regular social media postings, and has supported PS as recently as his recent personal "outing". It seems from social media that SS was a friend of MM's family - having socialised with them on family occasions. MM certainly appeared in photos to look up to him as a role model. Further information indicates that SS was in a relationship with MMs older sister, and that MMs family were very actively involved in the theatre group as members and supporters.
*PS became a patron of the theatre and regularly attended and supported them. The theatre's closed down last year and its web page has been closed down after the "revelation". This may be because the theatre closed down last year and is no longer paying for the upkeep of the webpage, recent searches have exceeded the minimum bandwidth allocation and therefore it is no longer showing.
*PS has been Snapchatting teenagers/young men for some years, illustrating a pattern a behaviour with a prevalence towards young guys who are young looking. His language and behaviour shows a concern because he is addressing young boys/men in youthful vernacular, not what would be expected of a middle aged married family man, and the use and promotion of the use of alcohol during these Snapchats is also a concern. Recent information indicates that he has also responded to a few young teenage women, but again his preference or target "audience" over Snapchat is teenagers, preferably males. One has to ask why a successful television personality in his 50s feels the need to try and engage with and solicit the responses of young people in "banter" in the early hours of the morning? I personally feel that there is a degree of grooming and exploitation in this type of behaviour, from an adult with experience, money and influence towards younger more vulnerable and malleable teens on the verge of adulthood.
*Yes, MM when viewed as a young teenager in the videos he posted could be perceived by some adults as a precocious, irritating oik (which, tbh as a mother of four, I can honestly say a lot of teenagers can be perceived this way), who wanted to make his way in the "wonderful" world of showbiz. But, and this is a big but, that in no way excuses older, richer and more influential men like PS from taking advantage of much, much younger adoring, desperate and vulnerable children/young people and using them for their own personal sexual gratification, and then possibly casting them aside once they lose their innocent looks and charming boyishness. That's called grooming and exploitation whichever way you look at it!
*In addition, MM is still a young guy (early 20s). It's entirely possible that his potential in acting or a career in television has been robbed from him by all this and by the adults who should have been giving him proper guidance and protection right back at stage school and at ITV. Shame on them. It is being touted that MM has accepted a payment for signing a NDA. Even if this were true, this payment will not last forever and his hopes of a career could still be affected by his association - whatever it is - with PS, who has long had a reputation of being a nasty piece of work in reality.
*Rumours are rife that both PS and HW not only indulge heavily (and glorify in this the day after on television) in alcohol but regularly partake in the use of "Columbian Marching Powder", which may account for some of their manic "under the influence" behaviour at times, as well as possibly their weight control and their reported unpleasant manner towards other people in more menial/less public positions. Obviously, we all know that other "stars" use and misuse non prescription drugs as well. What rankles though is the celebrity and profit PS & HW make from their reputations that they are clean living family people, and that they get to be "outraged and indignant" towards other poor people appearing on their programmes that struggle with their issues without the benefit of the "smokescreen" of hypocrisy, big finance and corporate protection that PS, HW & all their other presenter/celebrity friends have. It's sickening, hypocritical and a blatant manipulation of us the general public.
*Almost all the big presenters at ITV are represented and aggressively promoted by the same company JG Media, which coincidentally employs many of the adult children of said "stars", and which explains why we see them on so many programmes and in so many adverts ad nauseum. This is like a "mafia" that runs a protection around them to prevent "unpleasant" and negative stories appearing in the press whilst promoting positive and, as we have seen with the the big "reveal", basically fictional stories. This organisation seems not only to organise their lives/relationships but also influences the public's, because it controls the information we get access to and thereby decisions we may make. There is obviously not only reputations but big money in this. Just how much and how far are they willing to go - or have gone - to protect their sources of income?
• This all apparently started last July with a private tweet stating PS had a flat in London where he took young guys and that he had been in a relationship with MM who was a runner on TM. This tweet was made public after PS made his public "outing" on 7/2/20, but the timeline confirms the date of original post.
*PS is gay, apparently a fact known in showbiz circles over the last 30 years. The public, in the main, doesn't care about his sexuality (no homophobia here) - the issue that upsets everyone are the blatant attempts by him, his cohorts and the media corporations backing him to manipulate the public into believing this is a recent personal "discovery" or "revelation", despite its being known in the "business" - both television and journalism - for years. I repeat, No one cares that he's gay. They care about being lied to and being manipulated, particularly if this is any part of an attempt to cover up any other potentially more damaging (perhaps even illegal as well as immoral/unethical) stories and behaviours...
* Another concern is that this "revelation" may or may not be in connection with the rumours of PS being intimate with a much younger (teenage) person, MM, who he may have met at a theatre group he is patron of when MM was aged @ 10 or 11 yrs. He also "friended" MM on social media when he was 15 although there does not appear to be many tweets shared. PS then "mentored" him through "menial" runner work at TM for a number of years after MM had crowdfunded £500 for a move to London as a young teenage adult. MM was then "promoted" to personal assistant, as well as runner, for PS & HW before being moved over to LW in the summer of 2019 after an alleged falling out or break up with PS. Rumours were that MM was apparently sacked by ITV the week just before the big"reveal", but these appear to be unfounded because he was seen on the LW video blog at the NTAs and is still in the LW end credits. MM's Twitter and media accounts, alongside the web page of theatre he attended as a youngster, have disappeared. Further rumours have surfaced that 3 runners, possibly MM and friends, tried to gain entry to the TM box at the NTAs this year to celebrate with PS & HW, but removed on the instructions of PS who did not want menial staff celebrating with the stars. This incident is possiblythe catalyst for the "big reveal".
*PS has been "mentoring" young men at ITV who have been having "issues" with their sexuality for some considerable years, all the time he's allegedly been in a happy heterosexual marriage and it's only recently he claims, over the last couple of years, that he has realised and "struggled" with his own homosexuality. Being gay isn't a virus he contracted from mentoring the young men caught like rabbits in the beam of his celebrity and influence. No, his sudden epiphany and revelation about his sexuality was so dramatic, and it literally was a drama, that everyone could see that this was a public relations exercise in damage limitation. Of what, we do not yet know, but we continue to hope that the truth will out!
*SS (no relation to PS, surname coincidentally the same) ran the 2 Faced theatre that MM attended. SS was a child performer, with PS and has remained friends with him, occasionally appearing on stage with him, on ITV shows and on the cruise liners promoted by PS and his family. Coincidentally, JS also promoted the same cruise liners. SS has socialised with PS and MM, as seen in regular social media postings, and has supported PS as recently as his recent personal "outing". It seems from social media that SS was a friend of MM's family - having socialised with them on family occasions. MM certainly appeared in photos to look up to him as a role model. Further information indicates that SS was in a relationship with MMs older sister, and that MMs family were very actively involved in the theatre group as members and supporters.
*PS became a patron of the theatre and regularly attended and supported them. The theatre's closed down last year and its web page has been closed down after the "revelation". This may be because the theatre closed down last year and is no longer paying for the upkeep of the webpage, recent searches have exceeded the minimum bandwidth allocation and therefore it is no longer showing.
*PS has been Snapchatting teenagers/young men for some years, illustrating a pattern a behaviour with a prevalence towards young guys who are young looking. His language and behaviour shows a concern because he is addressing young boys/men in youthful vernacular, not what would be expected of a middle aged married family man, and the use and promotion of the use of alcohol during these Snapchats is also a concern. Recent information indicates that he has also responded to a few young teenage women, but again his preference or target "audience" over Snapchat is teenagers, preferably males. One has to ask why a successful television personality in his 50s feels the need to try and engage with and solicit the responses of young people in "banter" in the early hours of the morning? I personally feel that there is a degree of grooming and exploitation in this type of behaviour, from an adult with experience, money and influence towards younger more vulnerable and malleable teens on the verge of adulthood.
*Yes, MM when viewed as a young teenager in the videos he posted could be perceived by some adults as a precocious, irritating oik (which, tbh as a mother of four, I can honestly say a lot of teenagers can be perceived this way), who wanted to make his way in the "wonderful" world of showbiz. But, and this is a big but, that in no way excuses older, richer and more influential men like PS from taking advantage of much, much younger adoring, desperate and vulnerable children/young people and using them for their own personal sexual gratification, and then possibly casting them aside once they lose their innocent looks and charming boyishness. That's called grooming and exploitation whichever way you look at it!
*In addition, MM is still a young guy (early 20s). It's entirely possible that his potential in acting or a career in television has been robbed from him by all this and by the adults who should have been giving him proper guidance and protection right back at stage school and at ITV. Shame on them. It is being touted that MM has accepted a payment for signing a NDA. Even if this were true, this payment will not last forever and his hopes of a career could still be affected by his association - whatever it is - with PS, who has long had a reputation of being a nasty piece of work in reality.
*Rumours are rife that both PS and HW not only indulge heavily (and glorify in this the day after on television) in alcohol but regularly partake in the use of "Columbian Marching Powder", which may account for some of their manic "under the influence" behaviour at times, as well as possibly their weight control and their reported unpleasant manner towards other people in more menial/less public positions. Obviously, we all know that other "stars" use and misuse non prescription drugs as well. What rankles though is the celebrity and profit PS & HW make from their reputations that they are clean living family people, and that they get to be "outraged and indignant" towards other poor people appearing on their programmes that struggle with their issues without the benefit of the "smokescreen" of hypocrisy, big finance and corporate protection that PS, HW & all their other presenter/celebrity friends have. It's sickening, hypocritical and a blatant manipulation of us the general public.
*Almost all the big presenters at ITV are represented and aggressively promoted by the same company JG Media, which coincidentally employs many of the adult children of said "stars", and which explains why we see them on so many programmes and in so many adverts ad nauseum. This is like a "mafia" that runs a protection around them to prevent "unpleasant" and negative stories appearing in the press whilst promoting positive and, as we have seen with the the big "reveal", basically fictional stories. This organisation seems not only to organise their lives/relationships but also influences the public's, because it controls the information we get access to and thereby decisions we may make. There is obviously not only reputations but big money in this. Just how much and how far are they willing to go - or have gone - to protect their sources of income?
Saturn.
Chatty Member
Nah, I'm not having that. Someone as brave as Phil would not stand by and let all these rumours and allegations pass without responding and setting the record straight. He wouldn't hide behind an expensive crisis management company, and have them working around the clock to close down any reference to his activity online and in real life. He wouldn't send his daughters out to bat for him by re-opening their accounts to gauge the public reaction and see how his exploits are being viewed. He wouldn't use fake accounts on various social media platforms to either develop contacts at 2am, or defend himself anonymously when the 'shite' hits the fan.
No, they would be the actions of a coward. Not a brave hero who's unmistakable footprints remain on Westminster Bridge to this day, nearly 3 years on from his walk in tribute and defiance.
Chita
VIP Member
yeh - he undermined Fern alright.
She had revealed she suffered from depression.
It may have been after she had her children - dunno - but it was 'out there' that she struggled with mental health issues - plus self-image because of her weight.
So, as a valued member of the This Morning/ITV stable you would think Fern would have been given support - especially when it leaked about her gastric band.
No one helped her deal with 'why' she lied or why she thought she needed to even have a gastric band.
No one supported her or made excuses for her. She was OUT.
That 'lie' finished her off.
So, let us compare lies.
A woman struggling with mental health and weight issues is revealed to have [probably] misled some fans into thinking her weight loss was purely down to exercise and diet. That could have been excused because of her poorly mental state and given time, she may well have done interviews about it all to help others with similar struggles. The programme could have explored what she experienced to eventually help others.
Thats what This Morning is for, isnt it?
Her position as "presenter who was there before Schofield" was usurped.
He got himself more money than her for doing the same job. He sneakily gained power and used it.
He put a stop to her clothing line etc.
He made the work atmosphere so uncomfortable for her that she left.
Her career prospects decidely more bleak.
Cast adrift and branded a LIAR.
Spot the difference.....
A man marries a woman and has kids knowing he is gay.
Pretends for years and years and years that he is a hetero family man etc
Promotes himself as squeaky clean.
- and not only keeps his job but is widely supported by ITV and championed as being brave.
Yes .....Spot the difference.
And, yes, his Publicity campaign has worked.
He has won.
Thing is.....
Fern lied and covered up a secret.
Phil lied and covered up a secret.
Niceness shines through Fern.
It does not shine through him.
Hopefully other people see this.
And hopefully more people's eyes have been opened to what he is really like.
I stopped watching This Morning after he shafted Fern.
I will not watch Dancing On Ice while he presents it.
I do not watch any other programmes he is on.
Maybe other people will follow suit. Especially now this Mathew McGreevy business is known.
I disliked Phil before I knew about all this.
He's sunk even lower now.
And yes, as has been repeated many times in this thread - TV [particularly ITV] is dumbing down.
Appealing to the lowest common denominator.
Well, y'know what?
They can shove it.
The other day I was home all day with nothing scheduled to do.
I did not switch the telly on ONCE - and my life did not end. I did not go crazy.
So if the telly is shyte - STOP WATCHING.
Giving the bastards high ratings only encourages them to make more shyte.
She had revealed she suffered from depression.
It may have been after she had her children - dunno - but it was 'out there' that she struggled with mental health issues - plus self-image because of her weight.
So, as a valued member of the This Morning/ITV stable you would think Fern would have been given support - especially when it leaked about her gastric band.
No one helped her deal with 'why' she lied or why she thought she needed to even have a gastric band.
No one supported her or made excuses for her. She was OUT.
That 'lie' finished her off.
So, let us compare lies.
A woman struggling with mental health and weight issues is revealed to have [probably] misled some fans into thinking her weight loss was purely down to exercise and diet. That could have been excused because of her poorly mental state and given time, she may well have done interviews about it all to help others with similar struggles. The programme could have explored what she experienced to eventually help others.
Thats what This Morning is for, isnt it?
Her position as "presenter who was there before Schofield" was usurped.
He got himself more money than her for doing the same job. He sneakily gained power and used it.
He put a stop to her clothing line etc.
He made the work atmosphere so uncomfortable for her that she left.
Her career prospects decidely more bleak.
Cast adrift and branded a LIAR.
Spot the difference.....
A man marries a woman and has kids knowing he is gay.
Pretends for years and years and years that he is a hetero family man etc
Promotes himself as squeaky clean.
- and not only keeps his job but is widely supported by ITV and championed as being brave.
Yes .....Spot the difference.
And, yes, his Publicity campaign has worked.
He has won.
Thing is.....
Fern lied and covered up a secret.
Phil lied and covered up a secret.
Niceness shines through Fern.
It does not shine through him.
Hopefully other people see this.
And hopefully more people's eyes have been opened to what he is really like.
I stopped watching This Morning after he shafted Fern.
I will not watch Dancing On Ice while he presents it.
I do not watch any other programmes he is on.
Maybe other people will follow suit. Especially now this Mathew McGreevy business is known.
I disliked Phil before I knew about all this.
He's sunk even lower now.
And yes, as has been repeated many times in this thread - TV [particularly ITV] is dumbing down.
Appealing to the lowest common denominator.
Well, y'know what?
They can shove it.
The other day I was home all day with nothing scheduled to do.
I did not switch the telly on ONCE - and my life did not end. I did not go crazy.
So if the telly is shyte - STOP WATCHING.
Giving the bastards high ratings only encourages them to make more shyte.
Last edited:
Not a UK website and not hosted in the UK. So I believe injunctions are useless.
JenniferJuniper
Active member
I remember Phil and Holly saying to a guest 'but you knew he was married' (to a woman who gave Wayne Rooney a lift in her car). They won't be able to take the moral high ground in the future and that might hamper their interviewing style.
Saturn.
Chatty Member
I would love to see video footage of PS caught off-guard and on full nasty mode. I can imagine the fake / smug TV persona would quickly be exposed.Hi
Just joined, been lurking for a couple of weeks thought it was about time I dived in!
Apologies if this has already been posted, first time I’ve seen this photo, have no idea where it’s come from either, just popped up on Twitter. Has anyone else seen this or could it be a fake? I’m not sure, but thought it may be of interest.
View attachment 87612
Have I Been Here Before? is an ITV daytime programme, presented by Phillip Schofield, made by ITV Productions. The programme offers celebrity guests the chance to see if they have lived before, in a past life.
In a special edition of the programme, Phillip himself is regressed with dramatic results, as he discovers that he used to be a heterosexual and a devoted husband and father.
StrawberrySeed
VIP Member
This is victim blaming. You are ignoring the massive power imbalance between a teenager and a middle aged TV presenter for over 30 years. Do not lay the blame at the feet of a child.
It appears that this latest Twitter whistle blower, Matthew Lopez, was a victim of Cyril Smith’s child sex abuse in the 1980s. He has been interviewed about it and is fighting to bring child abusers to justice. This is the reason he has the balls to speak out. It happened to him. I hope someone in power listens.
Here are some more of Matthew Lopez’s tweets about being a victim of Cyril Smith’s. It has broken him and seeing PS on TV every day acting like a hero is really affecting him in a terrible way by bringing it all back. Poor guy. Lives ruined by thrill seeking perverts. It makes me so angry, especially those who are complicit and allow it to continue.
Attachments
Last edited:
I used to have a life, then I discovered Tattle 
I’ve always been a nosy baggage and like a good gossip, but until the PS coming out parade I had no idea that this place existed!!! I’m thinking of showing my other half how the dishwasher works as it seems all domestic duties now have to take 2nd place when there’s important stuff about pretentious overpaid twats to read about .... that’ll work 
I’ve always been a nosy baggage and like a good gossip, but until the PS coming out parade I had no idea that this place existed!!! I’m thinking of showing my other half how the dishwasher works as it seems all domestic duties now have to take 2nd place when there’s important stuff about pretentious overpaid twats to read about .... that’ll work 
Rob123
Active member
.
Update for my timeline of events & conclusions to date 25 February 2020
7 February 2020
Phil came out as gay 7 Feb, then a post was leaked from the WhatsApp group chat TLS Boys, this is a chat for staff working on ITV productions (TLS stands for ‘The London Studio’). It was posted by a Lighting electrician Miles Gilby aka: ‘Myles’ Gilby.
It said:
Fresh off the press - The Truth about The
Coming Out Party. Truth is Schofa been
shagging a runner on the This Morning set
reportedly looking no older than 12 (no it's
not me), fucked him over so he said he’s
gonna go to the press. So had to come
out publicly. Phillip you dirty old hog!
(Since this info came out, the Linkedin info page for Myles Gilby has been deleted)
Another informative post also came out from a very well known Journalist.
He reported:
ITV runner Matthew McGreevy,
Who forced Philip Schofleld to come out
on This Morning last Friday. He had a
deal in place with The Sunday papers to
sell his story but although (we) the press
are sometimes a bunch of W#nkers, we
NEVER make people afraid or ashamed
about their sexuality.
And there was a facebook post from James Nemo, it was actually the first info to mention that Phillip Schofield had been seeing a runner, and it was posted over 6 months previously (20 July 2019).
It said:
Things I've learned this week
Phillip Schofield is gay. Has an apartment in Southwark that he has 'the boys
over' to. And is shagging one of the male runners on This Morning. Leaving
his marriage an absolute PR sham.
Timeline of events & info:
Matthew Mcgreevy joined the 2Faced Theatre company when he was 10 years old,
Phillip Schofield was a Patron of the 2Faced Theatre Company.
14 February 2011 Matthew made his first twitter account (@matthewmcgreevy).
26 March 2011
Phillip Schofield followed Matthew on twitter (Matthew had only just turned 15 years old, 5 days earlier (d.o.b: 21 March 1996), he had NOT asked Phil to follow him).
Matthew then tweeted to Phil:
@Schofe hey phillip, thanks for following me, how are you? (there was no reply from Phil)
14 May 2011 Phillip Schofield visited the 2faced studio for Q&A's
28 March to 18 April 2011
Matthew tweeted quite a few times to Phil, commenting on his tweets, but Phil never replied to any, & he did not tweet to Matthew at all.
27 December 2011 to 3 November 2013
Matthews made a second twitter account (@matthewjmcgreev), he asked Phil to follow him & tweeted quite a few posts to him. Phil did follow, but did not reply to any of Matthews tweets.
March 2014
Matthew made a new twitter account (@mattjmcgreevy) - this was made at the time he turned 18 years old, (d.o.b: 21 March 1996)
30 March 2014
Phillip Schofield tweeted to Matt: ‘Hey @mattjmcgreevy welcome back! How's the acting going? Got the big break yet?’
Matt tweeted a reply but his account is private so don’t know what he said
A few minutes later Phil posted another tweet saying; ‘@mattjmcgreevy all good, see you on the @itvthismorning sofa soon then’
(this was the first time that Phil actually tweeted to Matt, & was 9 days after he’d turned 18.)
12 April 2014
Phil tweeted: Congratulations on your 2 shows @mattjmcgreevy 'Harriets Army' on CBBC and 'The Mill' Series 2 Channel 4 out soon! Result
25 July 2014
Matthew was invited for a day visit to the This Morning Studio
17 December 2014
Phil tweeted to The London Studio (TLS), he said:
Just recorded the @chattyman Christmas show @London_Studios ... There may have been tequila
Matt tweeted a reply but his account is private so don’t know what he said
Phil replied with:
soooo funny ... Bit rude for Christmas Day!
The start of January 2015
Matt decided to move to London and he made a crowdfunding page to help out his move which raised him £500.
16 January 2015
Phil tweeted:
Good luck @mattjmcgreevy in the new @Channel4 series #banana Hope it's your big break into this crazy business
March/April 2015 (end of March/start of April)
Matthew did work experience as a runner for 3 weeks at London ITV, he also did a filmreel project where he interviewed Phillip Schofield:
19 March 2015
Phil and Matt were filmed together in a bar by Jack Jones, the bar was in South Bank, London, near to Phil’s flat in Southwark
(Video at end of post)
1 April 2015
Matthew made a facebook post with a link to the showreel of him at This Morning studios, it included the interview with Phillip Schofield.
(video at end of post)
9 April 2015
Phil tweeted:
Good luck tomorrow with your tv training day @mattjmcgreevy @TV_TRAINING
(There were no more tweets from Phil to Matthew after this, so they'd probably swapped mobile numbers & were texting each other)
Matthew went back to Manchester afterwards and had jobs there
Jul 2012 – Oct 2015 - Connections - The Recruitment Specialist, Recruitment Consultant, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nov 2015 – Apr 2016 - Hollister Co. Brand Representative, Manchester, United Kingdom
April 2016 Matthew made his move to London and he started working as a runner on This Morning at ITV (later on he also became Phil's personal assistant)
Late in 2016 (around September 2016), Phillip Schofield got into SnapChat & became a snapchat sensation, loads of people who were using it were saying how great Phil was to follow and there were quite a few cases of Phil chatting to youngsters who were from 14 yrs old up to 20 years old.
https://closeronline.co.uk/celebrity/news/phillip-schofield-snapchat-tips/
https://www.dailyedge.ie/phillip-schofield-snapchat-3249836-Feb2017/
(At the end of this post, there are loads of Phil's Snapchats from the late 2016 & the start of 2017 + a video of one of Phil's snapchat videos)
Ages of snapchat users UK:
24 March 2017
Phillip was out with Matthew for his birthday night out (also with Simon Schofield)
https://i.ibb.co/pdmsTmr/eweewre.jpg
23 January 2018
Matthew was on stage with the 'This Morning' team when they won the 2018 NTA awards (unusual for a runner to be on stage).
https://i.ibb.co/fMbh8kL/Matt-phil2.jpg
May 2019
Reports have said that Phillip Schofield and Matthew Mcgreevy's relationship soured, and it became a toxic atmosphere between them, because of this Matt was moved to the Loose Women instead of This Morning.
28 January 2020
Phillip Schofield had Matthew Mcgreevy removed (kicked out) of the aftershow 'This Morning' VIP room at the NTA's.
Matt approaching Holly outside the MTA's looking annoyed
https://i.ibb.co/LCKsT5n/Matt-Holly.jpg
Matt with Maura Higgins.
https://i.ibb.co/Dpqd408/Matt-After-NTA-fallout.jpg
Phil vaping and looking stressed:
https://i.ibb.co/v3QZzhC/Phil-NTA-Smoking.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/bWcTtfM/Phil-NTA-Smoking2.jpg
My Conclusion:
When Phil came out as gay, the group chat from the TLS Boys, the facebook post from very well known journalist & the facebook post from James Nemo (who works in the production business), all said the same thing. They are not from made up people, & James had posted his privately 6 months previously.
Phillip Schofield followed Mathews twitter only 5 days after he'd turned 15, Matthew had not asked him to follow him or anything, this does not look good. Less than two months later, Phil went up to the 2Faced Theatre company to do a Q&A session there.
Phil started to tweet Matthew 30 March 2014, it was 9 days after he'd turned 18. Phil had never tweeted him at all before that. A few months later 14 July 2014 Matthew was invited to go to the 'This Morning' studios.
In March/April 2015 Matthew was given a 3 week runner apprentiship on This Morning & also he made a showreel of him interviewing Phillip Schofield, it was during this time that Jack Jones video'd them together in a bar. It certainly looks as though the runner apprenticeship was arranged by Phil.
April 2016 Matthew eventually made his moved to London and got a full time job as a runner at This Morning, late 2016 Phil was doing a lot of snapchat's with young men around 18 to 20 years old (chatting in the early hours, 1am and 2am).
It looks to me that Phil had his eye on Matthew and managed to get into a relationship with him when he turned 18. It may have been an open relationship because Matthew must have been aware Phil was chatting a lot on snapchat as there were news articles about this.
For me the fact that Matthew went on stage with the 'This Morning' team when they won the 2018 NTA award, and he was just behind Phil. Yet only two years later at the 2020 NTA awards, Phil didn't even want him in the backstage VIP area for This Morning, & he him removed, this says a lot. Add the fact that Phil has kept so quiet about everything, if he'd done nothing wrong surely he would have been very vocal about it, but instead he has been silent.
I think Phil may have sold Matthew a dream he could become a presenter, but it never worked out, instead it derailed Matthews acting career (which had started to go quite well).
Although my opinion is that they probably did get into a relationship, and that it was Phil who pursued Matthew, we actually have no concrete evidence of what type of relationship it was. There are those who may think Phillip could have noticed Matthew as talented (someone who could make it). He may have wanted to help him out. When Jack Jones took a video of them in the bar 19 March 2015, Matt was doing an apprentice runner course at ITV This Morning for 3 weeks (March/April 2015), they may have been out together at breaktime with Phil mentoring him about the interview he was filming. Unless Matt or someone else decides to speak up and say for sure what happened, it can only be an opinion, for me I can not say anything for certain.
With the snapchat, it does seem very inappropriate for someone in Phil's position to be chatting away with all these youngsters at 2am, but there is no evidence to show Phil was taking part in anything illegal & underage.
Nothing Phillip Schofield has said in his snapchats has been that bad. His joke about paying someone a fiver to drink bleach and die was obviously a joke, even though it was a weird thing to say.
And with all of these reports saying Phil was shagging a runner & had boys back to his flat. Has anyone actually witnessed Phil kissing them or Phil kissing Matthew, or being able to prove they were having sex (real evidence)?? Because although it could look obvious they were together (and especially with the bad breakup), without real evidence it can only really be classed a 'hearsay.'
And it looks as though even if some people do have evidence. They do not want to get involved because if they do, they could suffer for it and it could affect them.
The Myles post got leaked out, (I think it was meant to be a private post), since then he's deleted his Linkedin account. The well known Journalist has since deleted his facebook posts, he has probably decided it's best he keeps out of it. And James Nemo has made his post private again.
It's been said that Matthew Mcgreevy has been paid off, so the only one who can really confirm what has happened can't speak.
Schofield not saying a word about it & having this wall of silence and getting everything on the internet removed has been very damaging to him. He will have some devoted fans, but many people will never be able to think of him the same as they used to, this will have damaged his image. If he was innocent he'd be shouting from the rooftops, instead of putting up a wall of silence, that is for sure.
(There is said to be an investigation ongoing looking into everything - let's hope this is correct.)
Jack Jones video:
Matthew inveiwing Phil March/April 2015
here is a list of lots of people that Phil chatted to on snapchat:
(All the twitter links go to the actual tweet, other links to pics, with some verifying ages)
twitter.com/JakeChapman98 Jake was 18 yrs old (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/christianpw_ Christian was 18 yrs old (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/tomharris_19 unsure of Tom's age (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/daf_williams989 Daf just turned 18 yrs old (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/MikeyQueen96 A girl Shauna was 14 when Phil replied (chat was 27 December 2016)
twitter.com/SuzanneCam01 Suzanne 20 yr old (chat was 27 December 2016)
twitter.com/Oliviawheatleyx Olivia, not sure of age (chat was 31 December 2016)
twitter.com/aivilomm Another Olivia, she was 18 almost 19 (chat was 31 December 2016)
twitter.com/marcus_the_fish Phil messaged Marcus at 17 or 18 years old (chat was 20 January 2017)
twitter.com/lucasdawson24 Lucus was 18 yrs old (chat was 5 February 2017)
twitter.com/samgarwood_ Phil chatted to Sam when he was 16 yrs old (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/ELXGANZA Harry was 18 years old (chat was 21 December 2016)
link to pic here: https://i.ibb.co/w7KQf9P/Harry-Phil-schofe.jpg
twitter.com/niamhlinden98 Phil replying to 16 year old girl (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/anobrandon Brandon (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/AaronDodds1 Aaron (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/MeganAlexox Replied to Magan's mothers snapchat, so this one was not a youngster!!! (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/michaelrooke99 Michael (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/Sam1874_ Sam, Phil complemented his hairstyle (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/FEnticott Finn (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/naixxxo Nia (girl) (chat was 22 December 2016)
twitter.com/VisualsByGio Phil tells Gio he would rather give him a fiver to drink bleach and die (a strange one) (chat was 22 December 2016)
link to pic here: https://i.ibb.co/Hr3G3qN/C0-UVuoh-XAAAE30-L.jpg
twitter.com/nafe_hird Nafe, was 20 at the time (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/jayummz James (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/smxth_ Harv (chat was 23 December 2016)
www.gazettelive.co.uk
Phil snapchat sensation video
.
Update for my timeline of events & conclusions to date 25 February 2020
7 February 2020
Phil came out as gay 7 Feb, then a post was leaked from the WhatsApp group chat TLS Boys, this is a chat for staff working on ITV productions (TLS stands for ‘The London Studio’). It was posted by a Lighting electrician Miles Gilby aka: ‘Myles’ Gilby.
It said:
Fresh off the press - The Truth about The
Coming Out Party. Truth is Schofa been
shagging a runner on the This Morning set
reportedly looking no older than 12 (no it's
not me), fucked him over so he said he’s
gonna go to the press. So had to come
out publicly. Phillip you dirty old hog!
(Since this info came out, the Linkedin info page for Myles Gilby has been deleted)
Another informative post also came out from a very well known Journalist.
He reported:
ITV runner Matthew McGreevy,
Who forced Philip Schofleld to come out
on This Morning last Friday. He had a
deal in place with The Sunday papers to
sell his story but although (we) the press
are sometimes a bunch of W#nkers, we
NEVER make people afraid or ashamed
about their sexuality.
And there was a facebook post from James Nemo, it was actually the first info to mention that Phillip Schofield had been seeing a runner, and it was posted over 6 months previously (20 July 2019).
It said:
Things I've learned this week
Phillip Schofield is gay. Has an apartment in Southwark that he has 'the boys
over' to. And is shagging one of the male runners on This Morning. Leaving
his marriage an absolute PR sham.
Timeline of events & info:
Matthew Mcgreevy joined the 2Faced Theatre company when he was 10 years old,
Phillip Schofield was a Patron of the 2Faced Theatre Company.
14 February 2011 Matthew made his first twitter account (@matthewmcgreevy).
26 March 2011
Phillip Schofield followed Matthew on twitter (Matthew had only just turned 15 years old, 5 days earlier (d.o.b: 21 March 1996), he had NOT asked Phil to follow him).
Matthew then tweeted to Phil:
@Schofe hey phillip, thanks for following me, how are you? (there was no reply from Phil)
14 May 2011 Phillip Schofield visited the 2faced studio for Q&A's
28 March to 18 April 2011
Matthew tweeted quite a few times to Phil, commenting on his tweets, but Phil never replied to any, & he did not tweet to Matthew at all.
27 December 2011 to 3 November 2013
Matthews made a second twitter account (@matthewjmcgreev), he asked Phil to follow him & tweeted quite a few posts to him. Phil did follow, but did not reply to any of Matthews tweets.
March 2014
Matthew made a new twitter account (@mattjmcgreevy) - this was made at the time he turned 18 years old, (d.o.b: 21 March 1996)
30 March 2014
Phillip Schofield tweeted to Matt: ‘Hey @mattjmcgreevy welcome back! How's the acting going? Got the big break yet?
’Matt tweeted a reply but his account is private so don’t know what he said
A few minutes later Phil posted another tweet saying; ‘@mattjmcgreevy all good, see you on the @itvthismorning sofa soon then
’
(this was the first time that Phil actually tweeted to Matt, & was 9 days after he’d turned 18.)
12 April 2014
Phil tweeted: Congratulations on your 2 shows @mattjmcgreevy 'Harriets Army' on CBBC and 'The Mill' Series 2 Channel 4 out soon! Result
25 July 2014
Matthew was invited for a day visit to the This Morning Studio
17 December 2014
Phil tweeted to The London Studio (TLS), he said:
Just recorded the @chattyman Christmas show @London_Studios ... There may have been tequila
Matt tweeted a reply but his account is private so don’t know what he said
Phil replied with:
soooo funny ... Bit rude for Christmas Day!
The start of January 2015
Matt decided to move to London and he made a crowdfunding page to help out his move which raised him £500.
16 January 2015
Phil tweeted:
Good luck @mattjmcgreevy in the new @Channel4 series #banana Hope it's your big break into this crazy business
March/April 2015 (end of March/start of April)
Matthew did work experience as a runner for 3 weeks at London ITV, he also did a filmreel project where he interviewed Phillip Schofield:
19 March 2015
Phil and Matt were filmed together in a bar by Jack Jones, the bar was in South Bank, London, near to Phil’s flat in Southwark
(Video at end of post)
1 April 2015
Matthew made a facebook post with a link to the showreel of him at This Morning studios, it included the interview with Phillip Schofield.
(video at end of post)
9 April 2015
Phil tweeted:
Good luck tomorrow with your tv training day @mattjmcgreevy @TV_TRAINING
(There were no more tweets from Phil to Matthew after this, so they'd probably swapped mobile numbers & were texting each other)
Matthew went back to Manchester afterwards and had jobs there
Jul 2012 – Oct 2015 - Connections - The Recruitment Specialist, Recruitment Consultant, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nov 2015 – Apr 2016 - Hollister Co. Brand Representative, Manchester, United Kingdom
April 2016 Matthew made his move to London and he started working as a runner on This Morning at ITV (later on he also became Phil's personal assistant)
Late in 2016 (around September 2016), Phillip Schofield got into SnapChat & became a snapchat sensation, loads of people who were using it were saying how great Phil was to follow and there were quite a few cases of Phil chatting to youngsters who were from 14 yrs old up to 20 years old.
https://closeronline.co.uk/celebrity/news/phillip-schofield-snapchat-tips/
https://www.dailyedge.ie/phillip-schofield-snapchat-3249836-Feb2017/
(At the end of this post, there are loads of Phil's Snapchats from the late 2016 & the start of 2017 + a video of one of Phil's snapchat videos)
Ages of snapchat users UK:
24 March 2017
Phillip was out with Matthew for his birthday night out (also with Simon Schofield)
https://i.ibb.co/pdmsTmr/eweewre.jpg
23 January 2018
Matthew was on stage with the 'This Morning' team when they won the 2018 NTA awards (unusual for a runner to be on stage).
https://i.ibb.co/fMbh8kL/Matt-phil2.jpg
May 2019
Reports have said that Phillip Schofield and Matthew Mcgreevy's relationship soured, and it became a toxic atmosphere between them, because of this Matt was moved to the Loose Women instead of This Morning.
28 January 2020
Phillip Schofield had Matthew Mcgreevy removed (kicked out) of the aftershow 'This Morning' VIP room at the NTA's.
Matt approaching Holly outside the MTA's looking annoyed
https://i.ibb.co/LCKsT5n/Matt-Holly.jpg
Matt with Maura Higgins.
https://i.ibb.co/Dpqd408/Matt-After-NTA-fallout.jpg
Phil vaping and looking stressed:
https://i.ibb.co/v3QZzhC/Phil-NTA-Smoking.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/bWcTtfM/Phil-NTA-Smoking2.jpg
My Conclusion:
When Phil came out as gay, the group chat from the TLS Boys, the facebook post from very well known journalist & the facebook post from James Nemo (who works in the production business), all said the same thing. They are not from made up people, & James had posted his privately 6 months previously.
Phillip Schofield followed Mathews twitter only 5 days after he'd turned 15, Matthew had not asked him to follow him or anything, this does not look good. Less than two months later, Phil went up to the 2Faced Theatre company to do a Q&A session there.
Phil started to tweet Matthew 30 March 2014, it was 9 days after he'd turned 18. Phil had never tweeted him at all before that. A few months later 14 July 2014 Matthew was invited to go to the 'This Morning' studios.
In March/April 2015 Matthew was given a 3 week runner apprentiship on This Morning & also he made a showreel of him interviewing Phillip Schofield, it was during this time that Jack Jones video'd them together in a bar. It certainly looks as though the runner apprenticeship was arranged by Phil.
April 2016 Matthew eventually made his moved to London and got a full time job as a runner at This Morning, late 2016 Phil was doing a lot of snapchat's with young men around 18 to 20 years old (chatting in the early hours, 1am and 2am).
It looks to me that Phil had his eye on Matthew and managed to get into a relationship with him when he turned 18. It may have been an open relationship because Matthew must have been aware Phil was chatting a lot on snapchat as there were news articles about this.
For me the fact that Matthew went on stage with the 'This Morning' team when they won the 2018 NTA award, and he was just behind Phil. Yet only two years later at the 2020 NTA awards, Phil didn't even want him in the backstage VIP area for This Morning, & he him removed, this says a lot. Add the fact that Phil has kept so quiet about everything, if he'd done nothing wrong surely he would have been very vocal about it, but instead he has been silent.
I think Phil may have sold Matthew a dream he could become a presenter, but it never worked out, instead it derailed Matthews acting career (which had started to go quite well).
Although my opinion is that they probably did get into a relationship, and that it was Phil who pursued Matthew, we actually have no concrete evidence of what type of relationship it was. There are those who may think Phillip could have noticed Matthew as talented (someone who could make it). He may have wanted to help him out. When Jack Jones took a video of them in the bar 19 March 2015, Matt was doing an apprentice runner course at ITV This Morning for 3 weeks (March/April 2015), they may have been out together at breaktime with Phil mentoring him about the interview he was filming. Unless Matt or someone else decides to speak up and say for sure what happened, it can only be an opinion, for me I can not say anything for certain.
With the snapchat, it does seem very inappropriate for someone in Phil's position to be chatting away with all these youngsters at 2am, but there is no evidence to show Phil was taking part in anything illegal & underage.
Nothing Phillip Schofield has said in his snapchats has been that bad. His joke about paying someone a fiver to drink bleach and die was obviously a joke, even though it was a weird thing to say.
And with all of these reports saying Phil was shagging a runner & had boys back to his flat. Has anyone actually witnessed Phil kissing them or Phil kissing Matthew, or being able to prove they were having sex (real evidence)?? Because although it could look obvious they were together (and especially with the bad breakup), without real evidence it can only really be classed a 'hearsay.'
And it looks as though even if some people do have evidence. They do not want to get involved because if they do, they could suffer for it and it could affect them.
The Myles post got leaked out, (I think it was meant to be a private post), since then he's deleted his Linkedin account. The well known Journalist has since deleted his facebook posts, he has probably decided it's best he keeps out of it. And James Nemo has made his post private again.
It's been said that Matthew Mcgreevy has been paid off, so the only one who can really confirm what has happened can't speak.
Schofield not saying a word about it & having this wall of silence and getting everything on the internet removed has been very damaging to him. He will have some devoted fans, but many people will never be able to think of him the same as they used to, this will have damaged his image. If he was innocent he'd be shouting from the rooftops, instead of putting up a wall of silence, that is for sure.
(There is said to be an investigation ongoing looking into everything - let's hope this is correct.)
Jack Jones video:
Matthew inveiwing Phil March/April 2015
here is a list of lots of people that Phil chatted to on snapchat:
(All the twitter links go to the actual tweet, other links to pics, with some verifying ages)
twitter.com/JakeChapman98 Jake was 18 yrs old (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/christianpw_ Christian was 18 yrs old (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/tomharris_19 unsure of Tom's age (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/daf_williams989 Daf just turned 18 yrs old (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/MikeyQueen96 A girl Shauna was 14 when Phil replied (chat was 27 December 2016)
twitter.com/SuzanneCam01 Suzanne 20 yr old (chat was 27 December 2016)
twitter.com/Oliviawheatleyx Olivia, not sure of age (chat was 31 December 2016)
twitter.com/aivilomm Another Olivia, she was 18 almost 19 (chat was 31 December 2016)
twitter.com/marcus_the_fish Phil messaged Marcus at 17 or 18 years old (chat was 20 January 2017)
twitter.com/lucasdawson24 Lucus was 18 yrs old (chat was 5 February 2017)
twitter.com/samgarwood_ Phil chatted to Sam when he was 16 yrs old (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/ELXGANZA Harry was 18 years old (chat was 21 December 2016)
link to pic here: https://i.ibb.co/w7KQf9P/Harry-Phil-schofe.jpg
twitter.com/niamhlinden98 Phil replying to 16 year old girl (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/anobrandon Brandon (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/AaronDodds1 Aaron (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/MeganAlexox Replied to Magan's mothers snapchat, so this one was not a youngster!!! (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/michaelrooke99 Michael (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/Sam1874_ Sam, Phil complemented his hairstyle (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/FEnticott Finn (chat was 21 December 2016)
twitter.com/naixxxo Nia (girl) (chat was 22 December 2016)
twitter.com/VisualsByGio Phil tells Gio he would rather give him a fiver to drink bleach and die (a strange one) (chat was 22 December 2016)
link to pic here: https://i.ibb.co/Hr3G3qN/C0-UVuoh-XAAAE30-L.jpg
twitter.com/nafe_hird Nafe, was 20 at the time (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/jayummz James (chat was 23 December 2016)
twitter.com/smxth_ Harv (chat was 23 December 2016)
Watch Philip Schofield's Snapchat shout-out to his Redcar 'bro'
Matthew Welham, 19, started a two-week 'bromance' after drunkenly adding the TV star on Snapchat
Phil snapchat sensation video
.
Last edited:
JenniferJuniper
Active member
Is this it?Not sure if this has already been posted:
View attachment 87816
The article has been removed now: https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/o...-dishonest-not-courageous-clive-smith-1763068
PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions
Digital newsstand featuring 7000+ of the world’s most popular newspapers & magazines. Enjoy unlimited reading on up to 5 devices with 7-day free trial.
Schofield has been totally dishonest, not courageous
- Portsmouth News
- 18 Feb 2020
- CLIVE SMITH
For about the past six months Phillip Schofield had had nothing but bad press. There had been a series of headlines about him falling out with fellow presenters and accusations of backstage bullying. So it was quite the performance he put on for the This Morning viewers when he came out the other day. Interesting timing. Did it not seem convenient to anyone else that he announced he was gay at this time, just when his national treasure, ‘Saint Schofield’ status was being challenged? He’s made himself almost untouchable, like he’s covered himself with Teflon.
I cannot understand the outpouring of superlatives and support he’s been getting.
‘Brave’. ‘Hero’. ‘Stunningly brave’. ‘Courageous’. What rubbish! Some might call it brave. I call it dishonest.
And as for being a ‘hero’ for stringing along his wife and children for 27 years? Give me a break. He has deceived her. She’s been cheated out of the best years of her life with a whopper of a lie.
If he had left his wife for another woman there would be hell to pay in the media. Tabloid headlines like ‘Sordid double life’ or ‘Love-rat Schofield’ would be everywhere. But because he fancies men it’s fine.
I’ve never liked Schofield, I have always thought he was a horrible man, albeit from my armchair, and this little episode has reaffirmed how unpleasant he is.
Not because of who he chooses to sleep with, for coming out as gay is hardly big news nowadays when you have people identifying as aliens and toasters and falling in love with aeroplanes. But it sums up the character of the man.
And I can’t believe that on live TV, with his children and wife watching at home, he was being asked about looking forward to future relationships. How disrespectful. No thoughts for his family. It was all about the vain, narcissist himself.
I find it strange that we live in times when everyone is going on about loyalty, yet people are fawning about how courageous he’s been and he is being championed for being disloyal to his family.
Hi 
Just joined, been lurking for a couple of weeks thought it was about time I dived in!
Apologies if this has already been posted, first time I’ve seen this photo, have no idea where it’s come from either, just popped up on Twitter. Has anyone else seen this or could it be a fake? I’m not sure, but thought it may be of interest.
Just joined, been lurking for a couple of weeks thought it was about time I dived in!
Apologies if this has already been posted, first time I’ve seen this photo, have no idea where it’s come from either, just popped up on Twitter. Has anyone else seen this or could it be a fake? I’m not sure, but thought it may be of interest.
Last edited:
MrsJoeyMac
Active member
The Kerry incident still bloody rankles with me today. They would have seen her mental state BEFORE she went live & yet the interview took place. As a former mental health nurse I felt sick to my stomach & my heart went out to Kerry. Clearly ITV don't give a fig as long as it's "good" viewing.I have never really liked him, but there were two incidents (prior to this) that really made me angry. The first was the incident with Kerry Katona. At the time I was working and didn't watch any daytime TV so only read about it and caught up online. It made me feel physically sick to see them goad her on when she clearly wasn't herself for the pure satisfaction of dragging her down and raising their audience figures. His face during the interview was one of malignancy, pure enjoyment. It was appalling.
The next one was the David Cameron interview when he produced the so called list if paedophiles. Now, I am not a DC fan or a Conservative, but again my anger was raised by PS and his manner. Firstly, he was trying to be Jeremy Paxman, then he was acting all knowledgeable, hard and tough. And HW sat beside him like a Barbi doll. What a flipping hypocrite. You could see him itching, bouncing on the edge of his seat just prior to producing the list. As I said, hypocrites.
I used to watch TM when RM & JF presented, and RF annoyed me so much I used to start shouting at the television. He was the only person in the world I called a t**t. (Funny enough, I really like listening to him on radio though)
Then I saw PS presenting. There became two people in the world I called a t**t. My family thought this was hilarious, as I rarely swear.
Then I saw PS and HW together... My two people had now become a list. I officially have a list of t**TS
Also Holly the Horror had a flaming cheek to have a go at Kerry regarding booze & drugs. Have you seen the interview from The One Show?? She looks bloody wasted. Yet nothing is said about that......
Saturn.
Chatty Member
Last edited:
Saturn.
Chatty Member
That's what Phil said.Amazing
Saturn.
Chatty Member
Just caught a few minutes circa 10.45am. PS mask slipped when he used the Yorkshire Tea story as an excuse to absolutely slate Twitter and those who post on it about 5 times in 2 minutes. Like when he shamelessly exploited Caroline Flack's death with the #bekind sham, he is using the cover of another story to build the narrative that he will be a victim of social media. I thought you were a massive advocate of social media not so long ago, Phil. As someone said, you are a phoney, and sadly lack the intelligence or moral compass to swing public support behind you following your deceit(s).
Saturn.
Chatty Member
Just put +1 on for 10 minutes during lunch. Phil is acting a little weird - seems intent on normalising adults being active on TikTok. Not saying that the platform is exclusively for teenagers, but out of context, he has just said to John Torode and Rylan on 2 separate items 'Oh you're on TikTok aren't you?' Also made Alison Hammond create a TikTok video featuring him, her, and HW that was shown in the same, short, 10 minute period. Not sure why he is using the show to continually mention a site that is pretty irrelevant to the viewing demographic, unless there is a smoking gun, and he is trying to create cover.
Sorry to be idly speculating, Phil. I am sure that there is nothing to it, but these random things just make one wonder what is motivating them.