Part Time Working Mummy #3

[GiveMyHeadPeace]

You’ve done nothing to stamp out the bullying towards the disabled child in Seb’s class by highlighting her & her mother on your social media account Rachaele & you certainly haven’t made the world a better place for her. You’ve helped make school a much more difficult place for her than it already is and incited hatred amongst your cult members towards the girls mother. Disgraceful behaviour that I’m sure Kidscape would not encourage or condone yet you’re an Ambassador for them. Shocking. I can’t believe it hasn’t been removed yet but it’s already been seen by thousands so it’s a bit too late.

So she’s said she’s worked with those charities, not said donate to the page to donate to the charities. I feel like people have jumped on this band wagon of hate. If people were so convinced about donating to certain charities then they’d have surely donated to those charities themselves?? They’d have done that and not through someone else?? People who have donated should have read into this more. There’s no way I’d ever donate to anyone else if I wanted the money to go to a specific charity. That’s never been what it’s about. It’s all been twisted to make out she’s doing something seedy when she’s not. If she was, she’d have been reported to the police or authorities and investigated.

No one has ever said on this page that she has done anything illegal due to the way that her website is worded. However the title of her donation page is ‘Help Our Warriors’ and she also states that she wants warriors, charities and organisations to have direct immediate access to the funds - this certainly implies to me that a large chunk of the money will be going to them rather than paying Rachaele, Josh’s sister and her mate for their inexperienced time which has potentially put others in danger and has severe safeguarding implications.

I do think she started out with the best intentions but ego and greed took over and she just got out of her depth.

 

[Pom_bear]

Could someone please point me in the direction of the article written by Keels. I can’t seem to find it.

 

[GiveMyHeadPeace]

Could someone please point me in the direction of the article written by Keels. I can’t seem to find it.

I think she has removed it from being online now due to the thousands of messages of abuse she was receiving from crew members. Ironic. Apparently people were threatening her family and 11 yr old child. Am pretty certain that’s what I read on the Moral Queens site this morning before it closed due to the level of abuse.

 

[Mayday]

I don't understand why she's uploading videos of herself crying, claiming her anxiety is bad and this whole situation is making it so she can't leave her house. All people are asking for is clarification on where the money is going and if she is spending it herself as a 'wage', which is not ethical and in my opinion she should've asked for people to donate directly to these charities in the first place - not act as some sort of 'middle man'. Maybe she is genuinely struggling, but its not hard to release a statement.

 

[Partofthefam]

Keels should’ve just stuck to the PayPal thing and nothing else. In my opinion the PayPal was the only thing that needed clarification.

I saw ptwm’s stories...I’ve read here for a while & I've never seen anybody post that they hope her baby dies, if that’s true though it’s bloody sick.

Also, anybody find it a bit odd that the person claiming to be part of the family has now disappeared the same time Keels has?

I haven't disappeared. Just sitting bk and reading. I've got a family and a home to run myself soooooo I come and go. Thank you

 

[Skyeball]

The thing that worries me about it all is that you just cannot hold yourself up as an ambassador for DA survivors and offer help without regulation. And I'm talking a minimum of level 3 safeguarding training, specialist DA training, child sexual exploitation add ons, understanding DASH and MARAC procedures and a clear chain of command for escalation. i.e. a safeguarding overall lead with a solid career history covering all of the above who is on call to you're organisation as soon as someone opens an email.
You absolutely cannot work in this capacity (paid or not) without adhering to the criteria for social care intervention, a paper trail with all times and dates and events documented and GDPR regulations.
Sending a website user details of another person in an unsafe position, then later, offering no follow up, contravenes all of the above.
Tbh, even taking the details in the first place does.
You know, if you want to help people on the frontline I'd applaud that 100%, there's a lot of burnout in public service careers..so we as a society benefit from people learning how to care for them.
But it has to be done properly. It's a big undertaking granted, but my advice to PTWM is: Just stop. Take a step back..assess who you're doing this for and how to do it right, before you hurt someone in a way you cant fix on SM.

 

[Sr80]

I think now’s the time for you ‘ladies’ to unfollow her, stop the PayPal donations & give her book away. You’re way too invested.

 

[indecisivegirly]

I think now’s the time for you ‘ladies’ to unfollow her, stop the PayPal donations & give her book away. You’re way too invested. [emoji23]

Says you, who has invested time into making a profile just so you can comment about your leader I mean influencer

 

[Skyeball]

I think now’s the time for you ‘ladies’ to unfollow her, stop the PayPal donations & give her book away. You’re way too invested.

Don't follow. Have never donated or bought a book. But I've spent a 20 year career looking after the general public. So yeah, damn right..I'm invested in that part and I dont care who it is, who's getting it wrong.
It could be the Queen, and I'd say the same.

 

[Smithlarrr82]

Says you, who has invested time into making a profile just so you can comment about your leader I mean influencer

Passive aggressiveness like this is the exact reason that people like yourself are being labelled as a troll on this site. Plenty of people make an anonymous profile on here to spread hate but those who come on to defend are patronised like that for having an opposed opinion and made out to be in the wrong must have missed the T’s and C’s for that... Must agree with majority and cannot join if minority

 

[Isa-Bella]

These influencers do exactly the same though do they not? Delete all questions and comments that dont go along with the crew, army, gang or whatever they call themselves. People are afraid to question or incite a debate for fear of being set upon by gangs of grown women.

 

[indecisivegirly]

Passive aggressiveness like this is the exact reason that people like yourself are being labelled as a troll on this site. Plenty of people make an anonymous profile on here to spread hate but those who come on to defend are patronised like that for having an opposed opinion and made out to be in the wrong [emoji23] must have missed the T’s and C’s for that... Must agree with majority and cannot join if minority [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

Yeah there was no passive aggressive in their comment at all.
Also I don't go on to peoples pages and express every opinion I have but when I have an opinion on an influencer that seems to not be able to clear up the confusion regarding donations and also dealing with vulnerable people. Not sure if you have read the thread but she passed on really delicate information on someone that had messaged her page to a stranger that was no more qualified than PTWM is and then left it at that. No follow up no apology for leaving that follower in an awful position.

 

[Gemma87]

Found the site due to PTWM stories, spent most of my afternoon reading everything . I’m unsure what’s going on in all honesty, or who to believe. But I will say that having read it all, I find it strange how ‘Keels’ kept saying she was leaving, or her work was done, or she’s done all she can and will leave it alone now. About 10 times she said she wouldn’t pursue it... then she kept coming back? I understand people wanting answers if the Paypal situation is shady - but what this lady was doing just seemed so extreme? Really going hammer and tong to prove her point. Maybe she is obsessed with PTWM, I suppose we’ll never know. But a lot of people seemed to have believed everything keels said with very little proof (about her speaking to old family members, friends etc) all of that could’ve been made up? This ‘partofthefam’ account could well be her?

Oh I don’t know, it’s fried my brain and I’m new to it all! I do hope if PTWM has been doing anything below belt then this has encouraged her to stop, if nothing else. As for the rest of it, I’m just not sure.

 

[Not Today Satan]

Most of the posters on this thread have been here from the beginning and even though comments have been made where her children have been concerned there has never been any polls or mention of her baby dieing. Why would she lie about that...and if she can lie about that then what else can she make up? She said herself, she knew about the paypal thing a while ago so why not nip it in the bud straight away? There are so many questions and not enough answers from all sides

 

[indecisivegirly]

Passive aggressiveness like this is the exact reason that people like yourself are being labelled as a troll on this site. Plenty of people make an anonymous profile on here to spread hate but those who come on to defend are patronised like that for having an opposed opinion and made out to be in the wrong [emoji23] must have missed the T’s and C’s for that... Must agree with majority and cannot join if minority [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

Also if you bring nothing to the discussion other than..
Trolls
Mentally unwell
Obsessed
Wah you were passive aggressive in your comment.
Why do you care where the money goes.
Bullies. etc

Why do you think that you would be left to troll this thread?

PTWM deletes and blocks people who question about the paypal. So is this not the same. This is a space where we can discuss influencers if you don't like it why did you join?

 

[Not Today Satan]

Here we go again. Same as my comment on the previous thread. Anyone who disagrees, you say “you haven’t read the thread”. I’ve read it from the beginning. As previously stated. Ok so calling someone a cult member for not agreeing with you isn’t passive aggressive?

What are you defending (genuine question as haven't caught up in the whole thread). Surely converstaions/debates are the only way things will get sorted where everyone gets to say their bit

 

[Mayday]

The thing that worries me about it all is that you just cannot hold yourself up as an ambassador for DA survivors and offer help without regulation. And I'm talking a minimum of level 3 safeguarding training, specialist DA training, child sexual exploitation add ons, understanding DASH and MARAC procedures and a clear chain of command for escalation. i.e. a safeguarding overall lead with a solid career history covering all of the above who is on call to you're organisation as soon as someone opens an email.
You absolutely cannot work in this capacity (paid or not) without adhering to the criteria for social care intervention, a paper trail with all times and dates and events documented and GDPR regulations.
Sending a website user details of another person in an unsafe position, then later, offering no follow up, contravenes all of the above.
Tbh, even taking the details in the first place does.
You know, if you want to help people on the frontline I'd applaud that 100%, there's a lot of burnout in public service careers..so we as a society benefit from people learning how to care for them.
But it has to be done properly. It's a big undertaking granted, but my advice to PTWM is: Just stop. Take a step back..assess who you're doing this for and how to do it right, before you hurt someone in a way you cant fix on SM.

Totally agree, especially after that commenter came here and said someone else's information was passed on to them so they could help her and she felt incredibly uncomfortable and upset by that.

 

[indecisivegirly]

Here we go again. Same as my comment on the previous thread. Anyone who disagrees, you say “you haven’t read the thread”. I’ve read it from the beginning. As previously stated. Ok so calling someone a cult member for not agreeing with you isn’t passive aggressive? [emoji23]

Well if you're happy to follow someone who has a large platform and never question anything then good for you.
I will not put these people on a pedestal because they're human and it is inevitable mistakes happen, its how people choose to deal with these mistakes that either put them up in my estimation or leave it murky and unanswered.
Also you just go round in circles. Not adding anything to the discussion.

 

[Smithlarrr82]

What are you defending (genuine question as haven't caught up in the whole thread). Surely converstaions/debates are the only way things will get sorted where everyone gets to say their bit

Ok so every time I comment, I get told to “read the whole thing” as if I haven’t. I was posting on #2 (which you started) and now #3 so feel free to catch up in your own time and I’m sure you’ll see ‘what I am defending’

 

[Mayday]

Ok so every time I comment, I get told to “read the whole thing” as if I haven’t. I was posting on #2 (which you started) and now #3 so feel free to catch up in your own time and I’m sure you’ll see ‘what I am defending’

You're welcome to make a thread in the rave section then.