Honestly don't understand Livs responses of 'you're jealous?!"
I'm sorry but what a lazy template for an argument, if someone has a distaste for something she has done/said/, straight away they must be jealous, that's clearly the only possible option. It's just an easy, quick response which saves her having to actually consider why someone has left a comment which isn't brown nosing her and "jealousy" is an easy comeback as it can't be proven one way or another.
HOWEVER...
Consider this Liv; i commented on one of your posts once (nothing horrible, just stating you don't declare ads, i didn't slag off anything you can't help ie. Appearance/etc, just simply your morals and intentions behind your ads). You proceeded to block me and dm me telling me fuck off and being rather horrible. According to Liv, if you're horrible to her you're clearly jealous of her, so am i to believe that seen as Liv was horrible to me, she must have been jealous of me? As i find it hard to believe Queen Liv in her country mansion has much to be jealous of me for. I'm assuming you were horrible to me Liv because you thought i was being a dick, not jealousy. So have you ever thought to consider that people who comment on your posts aren't necessarily jealous, but just think you're a dick also?
"You're jealous" is so boring, it's the kind of argument you hear on a playground. I'd have much more respect for her if she could have an actual, intellectual response, rather than a lazy response which proven above - isn't necessarily true as I'm sure she isn't jealous of every person she posts negative responses to. Find a new argument Liv, it's boring.