I think most of you will have gathered from my previous posts that one subject I am passionate about is the protection of children from exploitation and their mental well being through their early childhood, schooldays and leaving home to tertiary education.
@Maddogsmum - hit nail on head ! The combination of arrogance and ignorance is astounding.
The Meldrums spend far too much time responding with tit-for-tat posts, sticking two fingers up to those that offer an opinion other than their own and baiting those they blame for their downfall rather than looking at the root cause of what they have themselves caused and retiring gracefully or at least creating a new business model which does not compromise their children's safety, privacy and future mental health.
If Lee, Rebecca or Karen are reading this, here are a few facts.
Those photos / insta clips you put out there of F & S pouting and batting their eyes with a filter on, children in the bath, naked toddler dancing, dad in bath with toddler - they may have been captured and stored in seconds. By posting these clips you have potentially marked your site as of interest to people who spend all their waking hours trawling the internet to get these images which will be traded. Yes, traded for money. You may think it is okay to use your children to create revenue but how do you feel about others selling your images for money or credits for potential sexual gratification.
In 2012 there were 222 registered sex offenders living in the community in NE Scotland.
18 months ago that figure had risen to 446 - that is only those who have been caught, convictions secured and registered.
In May last year Lynne Owens, head of National Crime Agency said that the number of Britons with a sexual interest in children may be seven times higher than previously thought ( previous estimates were a round 22,000 paedophiles ) When investigators were scouring sites on the dark web to identify paedophiles, over 144,000 accounts were linked to British people.
Banchory is not immune, Operation Magenta led to raids on property in Banchory, and indeed an Inchmarlo address was linked to a sex offender jailed in 2014 for five years for possession of child images and grooming young boys. Presumably released into community in 2019 if full sentence served.
Do not assume if someone has an interest in boys that they will not capture images of girls, they will trade them and get credit for supplying them.
What part of your brains is closed to the fact that by putting clips on Instagram - pre-pubescent primary school girls with a black & white filter applied pouting and posing for the camera - or a photo of man in a bath with a nursery school age child, you are potentially inviting others to store your images, sell them on / share them to those who have a specific fetish or area of interest, to masturbate / ejaculate over and fantasise about. Your children are not even anonymous images. One quick google and you can find their full names, date of birth, where they live, which school they go to. If your social media streams are regularly monitored by those capturing images, the girls bedrooms have been seen, they have been filmed sleeping, dancing, walking in the woods - a encyclopaedic resource for the fantasists to create stories in their sick and perverted minds in which the girls will feature. Your real time posts of where you are and where you are heading maybe not be relevant to a paedophile in Bankok but highly relevant to one in Bieldside or Banchory. Jerking off in their car watching you walk down the path to Dunnottar Castle, retreating to the toilet cubicles at Union Square having quietly filmed you passing by - does that not concern you ?
If you want to respond to Tattlers by singing Postman Pat or caressing yourself in lycra, go ahead - do I find it funny ? no - just rather sad. In my opinion it is a reflection of two people with overinflated egos who have lost sight of what is important in life, the right of their children as defined by Article 16 of The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Child's right to Privacy.
@Maddogsmum - hit nail on head ! The combination of arrogance and ignorance is astounding.
The Meldrums spend far too much time responding with tit-for-tat posts, sticking two fingers up to those that offer an opinion other than their own and baiting those they blame for their downfall rather than looking at the root cause of what they have themselves caused and retiring gracefully or at least creating a new business model which does not compromise their children's safety, privacy and future mental health.
If Lee, Rebecca or Karen are reading this, here are a few facts.
Those photos / insta clips you put out there of F & S pouting and batting their eyes with a filter on, children in the bath, naked toddler dancing, dad in bath with toddler - they may have been captured and stored in seconds. By posting these clips you have potentially marked your site as of interest to people who spend all their waking hours trawling the internet to get these images which will be traded. Yes, traded for money. You may think it is okay to use your children to create revenue but how do you feel about others selling your images for money or credits for potential sexual gratification.
In 2012 there were 222 registered sex offenders living in the community in NE Scotland.
18 months ago that figure had risen to 446 - that is only those who have been caught, convictions secured and registered.
In May last year Lynne Owens, head of National Crime Agency said that the number of Britons with a sexual interest in children may be seven times higher than previously thought ( previous estimates were a round 22,000 paedophiles ) When investigators were scouring sites on the dark web to identify paedophiles, over 144,000 accounts were linked to British people.
Banchory is not immune, Operation Magenta led to raids on property in Banchory, and indeed an Inchmarlo address was linked to a sex offender jailed in 2014 for five years for possession of child images and grooming young boys. Presumably released into community in 2019 if full sentence served.
Do not assume if someone has an interest in boys that they will not capture images of girls, they will trade them and get credit for supplying them.
What part of your brains is closed to the fact that by putting clips on Instagram - pre-pubescent primary school girls with a black & white filter applied pouting and posing for the camera - or a photo of man in a bath with a nursery school age child, you are potentially inviting others to store your images, sell them on / share them to those who have a specific fetish or area of interest, to masturbate / ejaculate over and fantasise about. Your children are not even anonymous images. One quick google and you can find their full names, date of birth, where they live, which school they go to. If your social media streams are regularly monitored by those capturing images, the girls bedrooms have been seen, they have been filmed sleeping, dancing, walking in the woods - a encyclopaedic resource for the fantasists to create stories in their sick and perverted minds in which the girls will feature. Your real time posts of where you are and where you are heading maybe not be relevant to a paedophile in Bankok but highly relevant to one in Bieldside or Banchory. Jerking off in their car watching you walk down the path to Dunnottar Castle, retreating to the toilet cubicles at Union Square having quietly filmed you passing by - does that not concern you ?
If you want to respond to Tattlers by singing Postman Pat or caressing yourself in lycra, go ahead - do I find it funny ? no - just rather sad. In my opinion it is a reflection of two people with overinflated egos who have lost sight of what is important in life, the right of their children as defined by Article 16 of The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Child's right to Privacy.
