Hello all
Have jumped over from the SODs thread too! What made my spidey senses tingle (is that the right word/phrase?!) was when everything was being repeated verbatim eg the crisp packet story. I get people can be high functioning while still dealing with complex mental health issues but when the story was repeated word for word it ended up sounding like a contrived sound bite and took away from the crux of the story - that PND can present differently/be crippling etc. The subsequent announcement of the book immediately after this just left me feeling that the timing was off. The gusto ad didn’t help this either - almost like a ‘right I got your attention now I’m back to flogging’ even if that wasn’t the intention.
Previous to this I’d always thought of Anna as one of the more astute insta mums (could take a bit of difference of opinion without crying troll, took onboard feedback/criticism) but actually a lot of the points raised here (looks at
@Dogmuck and tips hat) have made me challenge that view. Still not entirely sure which side of the fence I park my backside but can see that the Pukka’s are a well oiled machine.
Also the Flex appeal - I think is brilliant on a level, in that everyone should have the availability of flexible working but I see that it falls short.
It doesn’t deal with those who exploit it/provide employers with a frame work so crap managers can deal with that side of things - as someone else said you’ll get good managers who can see people are taking the piss but you’ll have a lot of others who won’t. As with everything it’s open to be exploited - again it doesn’t acknowledge this. You will have employees who value it and others who will take the piss and use it as a reason to do the least amount of work.
It is also primarily aimed at parents - the promotional videos have sound bites from others but doesn’t fully include them compared to working parents. I’m fortunate that my employer allows me a degree of flexible working now I’m a parent, in that I WFH the majority of the time but I’m not kidding myself as it’s still within the 9-5 normal working bracket. But I couldn’t imagine my colleague who has a dog would be afforded the same or a colleague with a dependant parent etc. It’s down to luck as to how good your manager/employer is.
I can see that levels of work could go up but can also see it could down as we all work/learn differently. Some people thrive in a busy working environment- whether this be bouncing ideas or just the social interaction where as others can thrive working from home. I have a colleague who is desperate to get back into the office as he lives in shared accommodation and is working from his bedroom so feels very trapped. He wants the social interaction of an office and a real change of scenery.
As others have already said flexible working doesn’t apply to all industries either - and also doesn’t apply to all classes of working people either? Add into this that ‘flexible working’ will have different connotations for different people - for some it could be adjusted hours outside the normal 9-5, for others it could be WFH while another person it could simply be the ability to occasionally acknowledge they’re having a bad day (for a myriad of reasons) and need to go home early. It’s such a broad thing trying to be squashed down into something too simple and doesn’t (currently) acknowledge the nuances within it.
Not sure who mentioned it but I did have a friend who worked somewhere they were allowed a ‘hangover/duvet day’ once a quarter. This was her first job post uni so obviously thought she’d won the lottery!
That turned into more of an essay/ramble than I first imagined! But basically I’m enjoying the open discussion MP’s recent posts have raised here.