Molly Mae Hague #58 I said Maebeee, she's gonna have another babyyy, cos after all, he quit alcohol

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
no one’s saying girls have to be hot and sweaty on a hot day, just put children in children’s clothes

mollys threads are only interesting when people argue 🫢
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Are there any UK influencers hot on Molly's heels in terms of followers/influence? Like ones in the exact same PLT/Fiat 500 vibe, I just agree she's boring as hell and don't get her continued popularity
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Looks like there was a big party for John Fury last night. Obviously Tommy missed it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Are there any UK influencers hot on Molly's heels in terms of followers/influence? Like ones in the exact same PLT/Fiat 500 vibe, I just agree she's boring as hell and don't get her continued popularity
Completely agree I don't get the attraction, she barely pushes much content out and she's as bland a boring as duck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
Thank you to all those agreeing with me that pointing out a toddler in a crop top bikini being inappropriate is not sexualising children. Whoever that poster is, fcuk off 😅 children need to be more protected on the internet and that’s a fact. Shame people like yourself don’t see the importance, do lil 🤏 bit of research plsssss. Comparing it to boys not wearing a top is missing the point entirely…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 32
Thank you to all those agreeing with me that pointing out a toddler in a crop top bikini being inappropriate is not sexualising children. Whoever that poster is, fcuk off 😅 children need to be more protected on the internet and that’s a fact. Shame people like yourself don’t see the importance, do lil 🤏 bit of research plsssss. Comparing it to boys not wearing a top is missing the point entirely…..
Yep. Not inappropriate to *wear* it and just go about her life and enjoy her holiday in a private way, with her parents.. and not be made out to be a mini young woman with a phone etc. Posting it to millions of strangers and the gutter press however.... Same goes for little boys with no tops. No, no, no. I've worked in MAPPA and I can tell you those images *do* end up in some bleeping dark places. Let kids be kids, don't post them publicly covered or not (don't even post them to friends and family even slightly uncovered TBH) FFS if you're not interesting enough to create posts without using your kid, you're not interesting enough to have a big following
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 38
Tbf all this chat about it being “sexist” is missing the point, little boys shouldn’t be pictured shirtless and shared with social media channels with millions of followers either. Call me ancient, but keep those photos for your confirmed non-creepy relatives or immediate family only. Protect all the kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 40
Thank you to all those agreeing with me that pointing out a toddler in a crop top bikini being inappropriate is not sexualising children. Whoever that poster is, fcuk off 😅 children need to be more protected on the internet and that’s a fact. Shame people like yourself don’t see the importance, do lil 🤏 bit of research plsssss. Comparing it to boys not wearing a top is missing the point entirely…..
Children shouldn’t be pictured and their faces and bodies shared online for a stranger to look at and manipulate. What do u care more about. Social media or your child. Maybe when they’re 18 they don’t want all their pictures publicly available! It’s not for parents to take away that right from them.
This advert shows the dangers, when will people grow up and start giving a tit about their children over bleeping “likes” and sponsored ad promos:


This also happens to adults where their social media pictures are taken by complete strangers, manipulated and posted on manky, vile websites.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Children shouldn’t be pictured and their faces and bodies shared online for a stranger to look at and manipulate. What do u care more about. Social media or your child. Maybe when they’re 18 they don’t want all their pictures publicly available! It’s not for parents to take away that right from them.
This advert shows the dangers, when will people grow up and start giving a tit about their children over bleeping “likes” and sponsored ad promos:


This also happens to adults where their social media pictures are taken by complete strangers, manipulated and posted on manky, vile websites.
I totally agree re using your kids for money purposes with influencing, but I do think people go a bit hard with the 'you shouldn't even post your child's face online' nonsense.
This country is filled with cameras and cctv. Your kids are already on film probably thousands of times over. There are men who monitor the cctv. Are we going to make children wear bags on their heads soon? Ultimately people could even take photos on their phones of your kids in public.
Every parent should be safeguarding their children adequately, but posting a picture of your kids on your own Facebook isn't endangering them. Pedophiles are gonna find ways to be disgusting, no matter what. As long as you know your children are safe, you're doing a good job imo.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 16
There's
I totally agree re using your kids for money purposes with influencing, but I do think people go a bit hard with the 'you shouldn't even post your child's face online' nonsense.
This country is filled with cameras and cctv. Your kids are already on film probably thousands of times over. There are men who monitor the cctv. Are we going to make children wear bags on their heads soon? Ultimately people could even take photos on their phones of your kids in public.
Every parent should be safeguarding their children adequately, but posting a picture of your kids on your own Facebook isn't endangering them. Pedophiles are gonna find ways to be disgusting, no matter what. As long as you know your children are safe, you're doing a good job imo.
There's a question of consent. Yes some weirdo could be photographing your child in public. That would also be without consent. Children are unable to consent to the terms and conditions of social media and as such shouldn't, ethically, be featured. I'm less concerned about weirdos and more concerned about big business using their image for AI, research, advertising etc - all for profit. I've given informed consent to these terms when I sign up for whatever service. Kids literally can't.

Anyways. This is besides the point. Anyone else notice how adorably cute B's hair was on that doc when it wasn't slicked back into a wet look man bun? I'm worried she's going to get tension alopecia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
I totally agree re using your kids for money purposes with influencing, but I do think people go a bit hard with the 'you shouldn't even post your child's face online' nonsense.
This country is filled with cameras and cctv. Your kids are already on film probably thousands of times over. There are men who monitor the cctv. Are we going to make children wear bags on their heads soon? Ultimately people could even take photos on their phones of your kids in public.
Every parent should be safeguarding their children adequately, but posting a picture of your kids on your own Facebook isn't endangering them. Pedophiles are gonna find ways to be disgusting, no matter what. As long as you know your children are safe, you're doing a good job imo.
A lot easier to manipulate pictures of people in say swimwear, when the image is in 4k and you’ve posed for it (ie frontal, clear face etc) than some cctv. It’s just about wanting to protect your own children at the end of the day. You can’t help cctv, but the people with access are limited, unlike posting something on the internet, (especially on your highly followed social media) in high resolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
I always think back to these instagram posts as proof of what a liar she is. The way she made it seem like postpartum and newborn life was a dream for her when in reality she was struggling so much that she’s traumatized. Imagine how these posts must’ve affected the women going through postpartum at the same time as her. She didn’t need to make these posts and and lie in those captions. Not to mention how she posted photoshopped photos of herself “snapping” back a few weeks after giving birth to make others feel bad only for her real shockingly different physique to be leaked at Fran’s bachelorette boat party. In the same way that she lied for years about her relationship being perfect when in reality it was on the rocks for years with cheating and alcohol involved. I will never believe her posts about how perfect her holiday was.

IMG_1467.jpeg
IMG_1468.jpeg
IMG_1469.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 55
Major agree. Everything is curated for the aesthetic, even when reality is the complete opposite. In the documentary, Molly literally says the proposal footage was from the same time their relationship was “getting tricky”. So… the relationship is falling apart, but hey, at least the proposal had a huge flower arrangement and a live singer in Ibiza for the content. Tommy abandons her right after she gives birth, but it’s fine because they got some "dreamy" newborn content for Instagram. Struggling with body image and refusing to address it? No worries. Facetune exists. Her whole online persona is a lie, and people still think she's relatable!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 74
Nah you’re an idiot who ever you are.
There is no way in hell I would ever post a picture of my child in next to nothing in terms of clothes, and there is no way in hell I would have my kid (boy or girl) running around topless. Not because I am “sexualising them” get a grip and actually think about things, the world is a disgusting place and can not be trusted which has been proven time and time again. I’m not putting my child at risk because of the “equality” absolute BS you’re spouting right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 36
She looks like she has lost a pile of weight based on that latest Instagram post... Or is she that good at editing 🕵?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
She’s back in her pointy shoulder era, she has a ring on her ring finger but not the engagement ring, … or is it a flipped image and that’s her right hand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5