Thank you to @IllBredHen for the brilliant thread name with most votes! 
Not reallyAre there any UK influencers hot on Molly's heels in terms of followers/influence? Like ones in the exact same PLT/Fiat 500 vibe, I just agree she's boring as hell and don't get her continued popularity
Completely agree I don't get the attraction, she barely pushes much content out and she's as bland a boring as duck.Are there any UK influencers hot on Molly's heels in terms of followers/influence? Like ones in the exact same PLT/Fiat 500 vibe, I just agree she's boring as hell and don't get her continued popularity
Yep. Not inappropriate to *wear* it and just go about her life and enjoy her holiday in a private way, with her parents.. and not be made out to be a mini young woman with a phone etc. Posting it to millions of strangers and the gutter press however.... Same goes for little boys with no tops. No, no, no. I've worked in MAPPA and I can tell you those images *do* end up in some bleeping dark places. Let kids be kids, don't post them publicly covered or not (don't even post them to friends and family even slightly uncovered TBH) FFS if you're not interesting enough to create posts without using your kid, you're not interesting enough to have a big followingThank you to all those agreeing with me that pointing out a toddler in a crop top bikini being inappropriate is not sexualising children. Whoever that poster is, fcuk offchildren need to be more protected on the internet and that’s a fact. Shame people like yourself don’t see the importance, do lil 🤏 bit of research plsssss. Comparing it to boys not wearing a top is missing the point entirely…..
Children shouldn’t be pictured and their faces and bodies shared online for a stranger to look at and manipulate. What do u care more about. Social media or your child. Maybe when they’re 18 they don’t want all their pictures publicly available! It’s not for parents to take away that right from them.Thank you to all those agreeing with me that pointing out a toddler in a crop top bikini being inappropriate is not sexualising children. Whoever that poster is, fcuk offchildren need to be more protected on the internet and that’s a fact. Shame people like yourself don’t see the importance, do lil 🤏 bit of research plsssss. Comparing it to boys not wearing a top is missing the point entirely…..
I totally agree re using your kids for money purposes with influencing, but I do think people go a bit hard with the 'you shouldn't even post your child's face online' nonsense.Children shouldn’t be pictured and their faces and bodies shared online for a stranger to look at and manipulate. What do u care more about. Social media or your child. Maybe when they’re 18 they don’t want all their pictures publicly available! It’s not for parents to take away that right from them.
This advert shows the dangers, when will people grow up and start giving a tit about their children over bleeping “likes” and sponsored ad promos:
This also happens to adults where their social media pictures are taken by complete strangers, manipulated and posted on manky, vile websites.
There's a question of consent. Yes some weirdo could be photographing your child in public. That would also be without consent. Children are unable to consent to the terms and conditions of social media and as such shouldn't, ethically, be featured. I'm less concerned about weirdos and more concerned about big business using their image for AI, research, advertising etc - all for profit. I've given informed consent to these terms when I sign up for whatever service. Kids literally can't.I totally agree re using your kids for money purposes with influencing, but I do think people go a bit hard with the 'you shouldn't even post your child's face online' nonsense.
This country is filled with cameras and cctv. Your kids are already on film probably thousands of times over. There are men who monitor the cctv. Are we going to make children wear bags on their heads soon? Ultimately people could even take photos on their phones of your kids in public.
Every parent should be safeguarding their children adequately, but posting a picture of your kids on your own Facebook isn't endangering them. Pedophiles are gonna find ways to be disgusting, no matter what. As long as you know your children are safe, you're doing a good job imo.
A lot easier to manipulate pictures of people in say swimwear, when the image is in 4k and you’ve posed for it (ie frontal, clear face etc) than some cctv. It’s just about wanting to protect your own children at the end of the day. You can’t help cctv, but the people with access are limited, unlike posting something on the internet, (especially on your highly followed social media) in high resolution.I totally agree re using your kids for money purposes with influencing, but I do think people go a bit hard with the 'you shouldn't even post your child's face online' nonsense.
This country is filled with cameras and cctv. Your kids are already on film probably thousands of times over. There are men who monitor the cctv. Are we going to make children wear bags on their heads soon? Ultimately people could even take photos on their phones of your kids in public.
Every parent should be safeguarding their children adequately, but posting a picture of your kids on your own Facebook isn't endangering them. Pedophiles are gonna find ways to be disgusting, no matter what. As long as you know your children are safe, you're doing a good job imo.