Madeleine McCann Netflix documentary

[Abasloute delight]

Madeline died in the arms of her mother and father, an 80% match of her blood in a hire car that was hired days after she had been “abducted” you wouldnt shout that knowing your daughter is missing, only Kate’s dna on the open window not even a glove match, just her mother’s where it was slid open, the truth will come out. Only they know what happened! That’s the reason they’ve kept this up so long as they have to but they’ll slip up when not expecting

Over 40 questions she didn’t answer and only muttered bloody assholes, if you aren’t guilty Kate wouldn’t you answer what ever question fired at you to not only clear your name but allow the police to find your “abducted”’daughter.
Have you noticed Kate and Gerry when doing interviews never give eye contact and always look to one another for re assurance? If this Happened in the uk they’d of been locked up a long time ago, there as guilty as they come

Also if my child was abducted in a country I lived a thousand miles away, I couldn’t pack up and come home so easy as what they did, id stay until I had some kind of answer

 

[GiggleBee]

I hate to imagine what this has done to the twins up bringing.

 

[SarahGard83]

Just watched episode 3 with the cadaver dogs. Spine tingling. Still convinced they're guilty

 

[Vee6]

Just watched episode 3 with the cadaver dogs. Spine tingling. Still convinced they're guilty

I think that the best one. The last few seemed to only concentrate on an abduction scenario.

I find it bizarre that there’s no time line for Madeline for the whole holiday. Only seems to focus on the night and time the McCans said she disappeared.
At one point there is definite dna evidence then a couple of episodes later that is disregarded. It’s like some one intervened. All very suspicious.

 

[Bubu]

I’m so confused about the former head of CEOP (child exploitation and online protection) -Jim Gamble. Something very shady about him. I’m on episode 5 atm but in a prior episode when he was talking about Gerry and advising him how to write a letter to madeleines abductors he was telling him it’s never to late to realise you’ve done a stupid thing (it was along those lines anyway). And he said he was saying this as he was trying to get that into Gerry’s head as he thought he may have been behind this as he felt something wasn’t right about him. But then on episode 5, around the 50 minute mark he says
the Portuguese police were “clutching at straws” when Kate and Gerry were made suspects. Why such a massive contradiction?

Did a bit of reading last night and there are theories that Gerry in 2002 was convicted of having child pornography, but all records of this got deleted and all was left was an empty CAT file where all the information on the offences should have been. Who do they think deleted the file? None other than Jim Gamble. Who better to lead a paedophile ring than the head of CEOP?!

Edited to add- I got to the end of that episode and Jim gamble is now of the opinion that the McCanns have nothing to do with it and he seems to be basing that opinion on seeing the twins loving relationship with Gerry McCann. Wtf?! That doesn’t make him innocent especially if madeleines death was accidental. And covering up her accidental death if they’d drugged her would make it an even more plausible theory of what happened if Gerry did have a CAT file for child pornography prior, as they would have lost custody of the twins and their jobs etc

 

[Twittwat]

I’ve finished all the episodes now and my opinion hasn’t changed. I think this series was completely biased towards to mccanns and in my opinion there are so much better documentaries out there that are more informative and actually look at the evidence without trying to force an opinion on you, it’s left up to you to decide what you think happened based on the evidence. This Netflix series was a joke, not really worth the watch from episode 5 onwards. But that’s my opinion

 

[Vee6]

And have you read about David Payne and what the Gaspher family said about him to social services?

 

[Youtubegossip]

I think that the best one. The last few seemed to only concentrate on an abduction scenario.

I find it bizarre that there’s no time line for Madeline for the whole holiday. Only seems to focus on the night and time the McCans said she disappeared.
At one point there is definite dna evidence then a couple of episodes later that is disregarded. It’s like some one intervened. All very suspicious.

I started reading the book someone posted above and there is a timeline in there. Basically they all had breakfast together, then the kids would go to kids club whilst Kate and Gerry ran or played tennis. Kate would pick them up for an hour at lunch and play in the pool with them etc, then they'd go back to kids club. End of the day they'd pick them up spend an hour or so with them and then put them to bed and go out from 8.30-11-pm I think it said.

The night before, Madeline had apparently cried all night for her dad and asked why he hadn't come when she was crying, then they still left her the next night (the night she went missing)

I'm not very far into the book yet though.

 

[Vee6]

I was watching conspiracy theories last night on YouTube last night about it all and I went to bed terrified and my heart was pounding.

 

[Bubu]

And have you read about David Payne and what the Gaspher family said about him to social services?

I will have a look. I feel I could spend hundreds of hours reading and watching you tube vids and it would still be just the tip of the iceberg!

 

[Vee6]

I started reading the book someone posted above and there is a timeline in there. Basically they all had breakfast together, then the kids would go to kids club whilst Kate and Gerry ran or played tennis. Kate would pick them up for an hour at lunch and play in the pool with them etc, then they'd go back to kids club. End of the day they'd pick them up spend an hour or so with them and then put them to bed and go out from 8.30-11-pm I think it said.

The night before, Madeline had apparently cried all night for her dad and asked why he hadn't come when she was crying, then they still left her the next night (the night she went missing)

I'm not very far into the book yet though.

I was watching one of Richard hills YouTube videos and any accounts of seeing Madeline after the Sunday are all shady and inconclusive, he was suggesting that she could have died days before reported missing

I will have a look. I feel I could spend hundreds of hours reading and watching you tube vids and it would still be just the tip of the iceberg!

I don’t want to put what was said because it turns my stomach

 

[Peeltheavocado]

I’ve been watching the same I’ve seen a couple of his videos before.
I also listened to the podcast someone recommended on here.

Just through a random google search I noticed a few of the main Conspiracy theorists don’t agree with each other. Briefly read a blog called cristobell? From back in 2016 and they wrote about why they wouldn’t watch any more of Richard Halls videos.

There’s so much information. It’s tragic. It seems, so many, including her parents have never wanted anyone to actually find Madeline.



I don’t want to put what was said because it turns my stomach
[/QUOTE]

 

[Web30]

Up to the dna reports. Of course thiers no clear results.. Thier were people all over the appartment and from what iv read the apartment had been rented out many times before the dna search was done!

 

[Anita]

According to the book, on the 3rd of May 2007 it’s registered at the nursery that Maddie was there at 9.10am taken by her dad, then out for lunch at 12.25pm by her mother, she was back again at 2pm and left at 5.30pm taken and picked up by her mother. There was reports saying that Maddie had problems in sleeping, she would be up several times during the night.

 

[Vee6]

According to the book, on the 3rd of May 2007 it’s registered at the nursery that Maddie was there at 9.10am taken by her dad, then out for lunch at 12.25pm by her mother, she was back again at 2pm and left at 5.30pm taken and picked up by her mother. There was reports saying that Maddie had problems in sleeping, she would be up several times during the night.

I know it’s only speculation but Richard Hill was convincing in that the nursery records could have been forged

With a long explanation as to how

 

[Anita]

The crying incident is on Tuesday the 1st of May, “ during an hour and fifteen minutes, between 22.30 and 23.45, Madeleine cries and calls for her dad from inside the apartment, she only stops when her parents return.

 

[Nicnac]

There's a really good (imo) set of videos, 15 now i think, on youtube by James bogart. Starts with
Madeleine McCann Case Solved Part 1.
Gerry and Kate know what happen to Madeleine, they are just so false. Who in the hell refuses to answer questions when taken into custody after their child has gone missing. They'd have a job trying to shut me up, telling them everything bout my child.
I believe that they had drugged all 3 children.
I believe that they rarely checked on them during the evening - Was Maddie not overheard crying out for her parents by a lady in a neighbouring apartment?
I think that maybe she woke up and heard her father talking to someone below their apartment, in the street, on one of his checks. Went into the sitting room and climbed up on the settee to get to the window. In her drugged state fell, hitting her head. Now was this on the night they reported her missing or before then?
That tapas bunch told aload of rubbish, changing stuff at every interview. Whatever happened there was a big cover up.
Wasn't there something about the priest that they turned to, who after a few days suddenly went cold towards them and refused to see them anymore, or something along those lines. Maybe they confessed to him and he wanted nowt to do with it?
Just some of my thoughts on it, i could go on and on ..... but i won't! Nothing is going to bring that poor girl back, but hopefully, one day the truth will all come out.

 

[Web30]

The priest is in this documentery. He seems to full belive they had nothing to do with it.

 

[Vee6]

The crying was reported three months later to the press by an 84 year old woman. And she said something along the lines of how the crying was from an older child not a baby. Perhaps trying to prove that Madeleine was alive the night before she was reported gone.

 

[Web30]

The crying incident is on Tuesday the 1st of May, “ during an hour and fifteen minutes, between 22.30 and 23.45, Madeleine cries and calls for her dad from inside the apartment, she only stops when her parents return.

If she was crying for 45 mins that does not fit the "every 20 mins" line. If they did the night she "went missing" they would have been doing that every night they left them wouldnt they.