Started another one as the previous one was getting to the end.
I feel like they’re giving out a lot of personal info, would they be allowed to do that if there wasn’t damning evidence?So with this latest suspect, has anyone heard/read whether they have enough to charge (am assuming not) or what the situation is? Seems like they have given out a huge amount of personal info about the inspect which is really unusual. Surely he could sue if it turns out he doesn’t have anything to do with it? I feel like they must be pretty certain?
I know, I just caught the tail-end of the last thread and thought it was out of order. It’s quite a heated thread.No it's okay don't worry I wasn't offended.
I just wanted to discuss theories
Exactly. Also it could jeopardise a future trial linking him to all these other potential children and his past crimes? I thought a jury wasn’t allowed to know previous convictions? Good luck finding someone in the world that knows nothing about this case?!?!I feel like they’re giving out a lot of personal info, would they be allowed to do that if there wasn’t damning evidence?
Someone on the last thread is german and she that the police likely have a lot more evidence than they're giving out as the german police force are very hush hush about suspects unless they are confident it is that person. I don't have the answers or anything more but that's what they saidSo with this latest suspect, has anyone heard/read whether they have enough to charge (am assuming not) or what the situation is? Seems like they have given out a huge amount of personal info about the inspect which is really unusual. Surely he could sue if it turns out he doesn’t have anything to do with it? I feel like they must be pretty certain?
There's no hard evidence they've said ..So with this latest suspect, has anyone heard/read whether they have enough to charge (am assuming not) or what the situation is? Seems like they have given out a huge amount of personal info about the inspect which is really unusual. Surely he could sue if it turns out he doesn’t have anything to do with it? I feel like they must be pretty certain?
But surely they've blown this now with the amount of details they've released, the jury would be well swayed against him .The press are even hounding his mumSomeone on the last thread is german and she that the police likely have a lot more evidence than they're giving out as the german police force are very hush hush about suspects unless they are confident it is that person. I don't have the answers or anything more but that's what they said
I read they had a tip off in 2013 but 'ignored' it but idk if thats trueHow do they find suspects 13 years after it’s happened. It always amazes me. I just hope they find out what happened.
If they ever do get to a definite answer I hope there is a time when we get to see all the evidence. Does that sound bad? I just find it all so interesting.How do they find suspects 13 years after it’s happened. It always amazes me. I just hope they find out what happened.
Seven yrs ago they had a tip off about him and let it go .Three yrs ago is when these details about him on the chat room and telling the guy in the bar came to light . Why act now ?I read they had a tip off in 2013 but 'ignored' it but idk if thats true
I was going to say why would you ignore a tip off but I suppose they must have had thousands!I read they had a tip off in 2013 but 'ignored' it but idk if thats true
No I feel the same. It’s been in the headlines for a good chunk of our life. It makes me feel sick when I think what if it had happened to one of mine. My mum tells me I’m too anxious when out and about with the kids but like I tell her in a lot of kidnapping stories it’s a split second thing, obviously Madeleine wasn’t but some are. It’s very scary.If they ever do get to a definite answer I hope there is a time when we get to see all the evidence. Does that sound bad? I just find it all so interesting.
does seem a bit weird. I get the feeling there is much that isn't been saidSeven yrs ago they had a tip off about him and let it go .Three yrs ago is when these details about him on the chat room and telling the guy in the bar came to light . Why act now ?
Feel like that about a lot of what’s currently in the press!does seem a bit weird. I get the feeling there is much that isn't been said
The mainstream press print what suits them, to the narrative that fits their needs. I would take all of it with a pinch of salt. I thought the Netflix documentary was good in terms of actual facts and evidence but then I suppose who knows what they left out/edited?? I don’t know who actually made it, whether they had a link to the case somehow?Feel like that about a lot of what’s currently in the press!
I keep thinking has it something to do with him being up for parole .Maybe they want to pin something on him to keep him where he is ,who would want that monster roaming the streets..does seem a bit weird. I get the feeling there is much that isn't been said
I thought this. Gives them grounds to deny the parole?I keep thinking has it something to do with him being up for parole .Maybe they want to pin something on him to keep him where he is ,who would want that monster roaming the streets..
That is baffling to me. Surely you would not leave the others out of your sight, let alone leave them in a child care facility the day after.The day after Maddie was abducted, they put the twins back in the creche if you can believe it!!! You would think that with one missing child, you would investigate everyone the child came in to contact with especially the creche service who knew the routine of the kids during the day!! Not only did they put the twins in the creche but apparently most of their friends also put their kids there too! I know looking after kids is challenging especially under stressful circumstances but two adults in the group could've looked after all 7(?) children for a day whilst the rest did police interviews/searching!
All these friends are meant to be intellectual doctors and researchers! The mind honestly boggles.