I’m not sure if anyone has responded but they really aren’t. I know foster carers who use their own money for Christmas presents for the children. If they were taking more complicated children they may get more £ but then they are dealing with some of the most vulnerable, traumatised children. You wouldn’t foster for money. It’s not worth it.
My sister is and has been a foster carer over the past 25 or so years, it is her vocation, however she does get paid. She has no partner and devotes her life to these children. She gets £25k a year, tax free and does get allowances on top for school uniforms, trips, etc. She has not received any grants for building work as her home is adequate for the one child at a time she fosters. She has had many difficult children, but they are not all demanding. She does buy their Christmas and birthday presents if they are with her on their birthday. Though it is recommended that these gifts are never too expensive. When they return to their parents it can make things worse if they are unable to carry on with extravagant presents.
It has provided her with an income and she has been able to buy her home whilst only working part time in a school kitchen as her other income. It is not a fortune and she deserves every penny, but it does provide an income in excess of the expenses incurred.
I agree that you wouldn't foster just for money, it has to be a vocation. It is really hard and emotional work sometimes. It certainly isn't for everyone. But to suggest that it isn't financially beneficial is not true.
If Jack's parents fostered 2 children at once, then they would without doubt have received more money than they spent on those children. And rightly so, it is a job and should be paid for. In fact they should receive far more.
What makes me angry is the way in which Jack, by omission, suggests that her parents were fostering without any payment. That they were taking in troubled children out of the goodness of their hearts. It was a job for which her parents received payment. What also upsets me is the way she talks about those children, with resentment and not love. They were a burden to her as she had to, in her words, co parent them.