First of all, hello again and well done for continuing to point out that Jack’s lies and BS are indeed lies and BS. She is so prolific that it’s an endless task, but I do think it’s important for there to be records of the holes in her fairy stories.
Second of all, I never grunked that far back when I came across this place a few weeks ago. But I’ve since seen posters referring to thread 31, so I went back and read it, and holy bleeping duck I can’t believe she actually popped over for a visit and then *made herself look like even more of a head than she already did*. bleeping AMAZING. How can one person be so utterly self-obsessed (especially when they really ain’t all that!)?! Just, wow, very very wow indeed. I know I said in my previous posts that I thought she should take time out of public life and get some serious therapy, but I think it even more having read her pathetic posts.
Thread 31 also made me have way less sympathy for her too. Based on how unpopular she is in her home town, I’d assumed she’s just a lonely and terminally online person desperate for attention and having nobody looking out for her mental health - but it turned out that posters here were encouraging her, directly, to get help even two years ago! So she was getting support and encouragement, and yet still she’s chosen to be tit and lie and to not listen and learn, I can see how the lack of self improvement and reflection is an active choice now. Sad at her age, and somehow even a bit sadder because she’s a parent and IMO that means she has an active *responsibility* to improve and reflect and be better. Ho hum. I suppose we just have to wait for it to play out.
Thirdly, for those commenting on SB missing out on holidays and time with his mum, I did note earlier that Jack herself has said she hasn’t received any benefits payments since 2014. IF SB had been living with her, she would have been eligible for a decent amount of UC for housing costs on top of ChB, so if she’s telling truth about not receiving any benefits for all these years, then the only logical conclusion can be that she’s been the non-resident parent so didn’t qualify for the UC and SB’s dad has been the resident parent. We know SB lives with dad now, but if - IF - she really truly hasn’t had any benefits since 2014 then dad has been the resident parent for the duration. (Or she’s lying about not receiving any benefits, not an impossible scenario.) It’s either that or since 2014 she’s had an income high enough to make her ineligible for any UC top-up - which would mean over the median UK salary if not more, I think.
And fourthly I checked her postcode on the Indices of Multiple Deprivation database, and she literally lives in one of the very, very LEAST deprived areas of the entire sodding country (10 in the IMD range, where 1 is most deprived and 10 is least deprived.) By contrast, my parents’ postcode is less than 2miles/10mins drive away and it’s in one of the very most deprived areas of the entire country, a 1 on that scale. So with that knowledge plus the holidays, I sincerely believe Jack is an increasingly unconvincing poverty cosplayer, and that Lee Anderson would wipe the floor with her if she ever managed to get a libel case heard. But she won’t pursue it, because her whole accusation of libel hinges on the reality of her finances and donors - profiting from people poorer than her - and she won’t want anyone properly looking at her income streams.
- but surely drinking alcohol free beer so much is inadvisable at best? 
