I say it again, the best thing Alice could have done was announcing it (although in a more neutral way, leaving his kids was clearly a lie, at least in the way people would define it, and framing it like this will backfire), that the move came from him could have been leaked via anonymous sources in tabloids, but even that wouldnt be needed, the tabloids always speculate first about the men having an affair (as it actually happened), so the narrative would have been on her side either way. And then just shut up about it and build her case while assuring her kids that no matter what happens mom and dad love them. When this came up the first time EVEN I thought that he was the bad guy, although I knew of all the other stuff. The fact that many many people didnt really know of them before this - and thus the majority will always assume the things that happen most commonly - is another advantage she just threw away IMO.
She claims that she does all this to defend herself, to not let herself by silenced, and so on and so forth, but all she does is making most people feel more sorry for him and seeing through her lies (because she isnt keeping track of them). Which is terribly unfortunate, because for all we know some of the things she says are true, and he gets away with it thanks to her being rightfully seen as a unreliable narrator. I really dont get what she tries to achieve: He isnt giving in to her demands or is more willing to have a good relationship with her if she is yelling about him online, it just drives him even further away. The legal threats will certainly be to a large extent related to her behavior. And her behavior is certainly weaking her case if they do get to court. It also potentially trashes his reputation and thus their livelihood. Playing this all out in public WILL hurt the children, she is absolutely delusional if she thinks otherwise. Yes, the fact that the divorce happened in the first place is hurting them too, but having the humiliation in public, mom and dad fighting (cause this is what will happen when she gets her wish and he does turn up at their house), mom supporting their fear that dad doesnt love or care about them & mom probably keep trashing dad in front of them (without a doubt the case, alone that she wanted to hijack a phone call to talk about issues in front of the kid, or the whole showing the 7 year old the newspaper article, or the eldes doign getting involved in her tactics are indicators besides the fact that she already does it in public) is just so much worse. EVERYONE in that field will tell her the same, as somebody said here she is otherwise reasonable when it comes to Science, why not here?
Seriously, there is no single advantage in her approach, except of getting pats from some people who dont know what a balanced approach is. The whole Weinstein comparisons btw are insane: Weinstein wasnt the (still involved) father of her kids, her main source of income and she didnt tell twenty different stories about him to contradict herself. The only downside in coming out against him was the danger to lose a source of income (which in some of the girls cases that came out about it was obviously a huge risk). But overall it had enough upsides. Especially since he was actually guilty for something really terrible. I dont even know at this point what exactly she is accusing Ioan of that isnt somehow the natural process of a divorce. And even if he did, there is always a better time for this