I meant more in the sense that HMRC
and Social Services have been mentioned, that starts a very different process than altering their add revenue through awareness
I meant more in the sense of references to HMRC and Social Services and other government and local authority agencies.
I can understand that, but at the moment I think we can all agree there are children in much worse positions. That social services need to have the time to dedicate to. If things deteriorated in these girls home conditions then by all means!I don't watch the vlogs anymore but if I did and I saw something genuinely concerning regarding Chris's behaviour or the welfare of those children I wouldn't hesitate in reporting them, I don't care if that makes you think bad of me, I couldn't give two hoots if it makes me a 'hater' or 'jealous' I would rather than than something actual happen to them. As it goes I think there should be some sort of social (more so safeguarding) involvement of all child who film for YouTube it is not a normal way to be raised and when all these children reach adulthood they'll be a lot of messed up people
I'm pretty sure there aren't really any regulations on Youtube kids. I guess for kids acting in tv or movies, they are being hired so are protected by the laws in that regard (as the production company wouldn't want to be sued), and are also able to have stand-in kids (mostly with babies). But with Youtube, I don't think that law counts. I know there was an NSPCC campaign started, but I think that was more to protect fans then the Youtuber kids. I definitely think its something the government need to look into though.I can understand that, but at the moment I think we can all agree there are children in much worse positions. That social services need to have the time to dedicate to. If things deteriorated in these girls home conditions then by all means!
I am aware that YouTube include a signpost about child labour laws and minors in acting etc. It might be worth investigating child acting regulations, these children are performing. So do they have performing licences? Are they expected to be licensed? Any child involved in theatrical productions, film or tv shows need to have a licence in order that their local authority can be sure that they are attending school and not being made unwell or unnecessarily tired. Does anyone know where family vlogging stands on this???
Because Izzy brings in the money.Why is Isabelle always in the thumbnail? Never Esme?
Yes I agree there are unfortunately many children much worse off that need social services to step in and help them right now. However, I do think that the way the kids are dragged around everywhere and expected to perform does have a big impact on their health and well-being and that shouldn’t be dismissed. Again though, unfortunately I don’t think there are enough social workers out there to help children in these situations. And there should be guidelines and laws for children on YT but I don’t think there is as of yet.I can understand that, but at the moment I think we can all agree there are children in much worse positions. That social services need to have the time to dedicate to. If things deteriorated in these girls home conditions then by all means!
I am aware that YouTube include a signpost about child labour laws and minors in acting etc. It might be worth investigating child acting regulations, these children are performing. So do they have performing licences? Are they expected to be licensed? Any child involved in theatrical productions, film or tv shows need to have a licence in order that their local authority can be sure that they are attending school and not being made unwell or unnecessarily tired. Does anyone know where family vlogging stands on this???
I am NO fan of Lazy but this makes Creepy go even further down in my estimation. He's dragged his whole family through this sh*t show because he's nothing but a filthy creepy pervert and now he's putting down the girls' mother like he thinks that's going to get people on his side. He is just a narcissistic pig who thinks he's invincible and unstoppable and I really, REALLY hope he's reading this and is "super duper grateful" that I've been so restrained and haven't told him what I really think. #AndBreatheStarting to notice more and more swipes at Lazy from Creepy, today when she started chatting tit about the paint set and asked him if it made him feel nostalgic and he straight up said no. Then in the car when Lazy said there's no point in buying things they don't need or want (LOL) and Creepy was like, "Obviously...".
Because she is their cash cow...Why is Isabelle always in the thumbnail? Never Esme?
Just brilliantly worded.No "hate" ,just pure facts ,which cause us adults to continue talking about people who honestly should not be on youtube any longer.Thankyou.Several points here:-
Everyone is entitled to their own opinon on the Minghams even when it appears to others to be convoluted tripe.
This is a GOSSIP site which by definition is a place for casual or unconstrained conversation about people or situations which are not confirmed as true.
To accuse posters on here of harassment and waging a hate campaign then ask for no retaliation is naive at the very least.
Creepy Ingham is a sexual predator of young teenage girls.
The messages he sent and has not denied himself, were confirmed as genuine by the police.
His victims have been hounded online for months by trolls, supported by Creepy and Lazy.
They are continuing to portray a wholesome lifestyle on a family YouTube channel that is aimed at young girls.
He should have been removed by YouTube months ago as in any other job Creepy would have been suspended immediately the accusations were made.
Is that quite enough facts for you to think about, whilst the grown ups have a chat?
If you think that this is harsh just be thankful that I deleted my first draft