Harry and Meghan #501 The Repellent Appellant

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Winning title by @KatLit - well done!

Last thread here - https://tattle.life/threads/harry-a...500-threads-and-we-would-walk-500-more.49119/


We discussed Meghan's latest half arsed attempt at being a businesswoman.
Not enough products in stock. The products that were in stock were tat and people's money was debited whether they got stock or not.

We laughed and took the piss, but were outraged at the same time because she keeps getting away with it.
Then Harry came to the UK again to demand full time Royal Protection Officers from the courts.

We all wish he would bore off.

William took George to the football and showed us what real royals do.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 67
A couple of new Radaronline articles, both on a similar theme. And yes me all know Smeg is 'Demanding' 🤣


 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 34
I guess yesterday he wore the old school tie of his judge, a subtle trick lawyers have been known to ask their clients to do to gain favour with judges.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 52
A couple of new Radaronline articles, both on a similar theme. And yes me all know Smeg is 'Demanding' 🤣


Well she can demand all she wants can't she? Honestly what self important twit she is. KC3 has no need to discuss it with them. I'm sure if the RF need to communicate changes to them that it will be done in writing with lawyers. Every single sentence uttered would be reported, and twisted.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 46
Thanks for the new thread and title. :)

A couple of new Radaronline articles, both on a similar theme. And yes me all know Smeg is 'Demanding' 🤣


:ROFLMAO:

The first one. William might be generous and leave them with the Dumbarton Earldom if they're that desperate to go on milking their Royal connections.

"As Ever, The Countess of Dumbarton" has a nice ring to it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 50
Another beauty from -
1000028491.jpg


"Meghan Markle, that tireless beacon of self-absorption, has once again foisted her voice upon us with ‘Confessions of a Female Founder’, unleashed on the 8th of April like a punishment we didn’t earn. Ostensibly a platform for Whitney Wolfe Herd - Bumble’s founder and a woman who’s actually achieved something beyond marrying upwards - to share her story, it’s predictably hijacked by Meghan’s pathological need to prattle on about herself like an annoying galah at 5am disturbing one’s slumber.

The UK press have swung their axes with relish, and who can blame them? The Telegraph’s Chris Bennion, doling out a pitiful two stars, brands it “frustrating” - a polite way of saying it’s a vacuous slog, devoid of confessions and bloated with Meghan’s signature tripe: self-care platitudes and nauseating “mutual adoration.” The Guardian’s Rachel Aroesti, matching the two-star contempt, dubs it a “sycophantic stomach-turner” - a chinwag so cloying it could curdle milk, better suited to a padded cell than a podcast. Then there’s The Times’ Charlie Gowans-Eglinton, who, with a lone star and a stopwatch, reveals Meghan wittering for an agonising eight minutes and 48 seconds before Whitney gets a paltry 17-second window to speak. Seventeen seconds! Meghan, presumably winded from pontificating about her own profundity, couldn’t spare more.

Whitney - a business titan who co-birthed Tinder and built Bumble into a billion dollar empire - might’ve offered a shred of substance: grit, cunning, the odd ruthless decision. Instead, we’re served Meghan’s insipid monologue, a suffocating fog of perfumed nonsense where her guest is little more than a mute accessory to the Duchass’s endless self-worship.
It’s not a podcast; it’s a one-woman shrine, and we’re all forced to kneel.

Spare us."

From which I steal a title suggestion....


Harry & Meghan #502 Meghan Markle, that tireless beacon of self-absorption
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 92
Another beauty from -
View attachment 3505558

"Meghan Markle, that tireless beacon of self-absorption, has once again foisted her voice upon us with ‘Confessions of a Female Founder’, unleashed on the 8th of April like a punishment we didn’t earn. Ostensibly a platform for Whitney Wolfe Herd - Bumble’s founder and a woman who’s actually achieved something beyond marrying upwards - to share her story, it’s predictably hijacked by Meghan’s pathological need to prattle on about herself like an annoying galah at 5am disturbing one’s slumber.

The UK press have swung their axes with relish, and who can blame them? The Telegraph’s Chris Bennion, doling out a pitiful two stars, brands it “frustrating” - a polite way of saying it’s a vacuous slog, devoid of confessions and bloated with Meghan’s signature tripe: self-care platitudes and nauseating “mutual adoration.” The Guardian’s Rachel Aroesti, matching the two-star contempt, dubs it a “sycophantic stomach-turner” - a chinwag so cloying it could curdle milk, better suited to a padded cell than a podcast. Then there’s The Times’ Charlie Gowans-Eglinton, who, with a lone star and a stopwatch, reveals Meghan wittering for an agonising eight minutes and 48 seconds before Whitney gets a paltry 17-second window to speak. Seventeen seconds! Meghan, presumably winded from pontificating about her own profundity, couldn’t spare more.

Whitney - a business titan who co-birthed Tinder and built Bumble into a billion dollar empire - might’ve offered a shred of substance: grit, cunning, the odd ruthless decision. Instead, we’re served Meghan’s insipid monologue, a suffocating fog of perfumed nonsense where her guest is little more than a mute accessory to the Duchass’s endless self-worship.
It’s not a podcast; it’s a one-woman shrine, and we’re all forced to kneel.

Spare us."

From which I steal a title suggestion....


Harry & Meghan #502 Meghan Markle, that tireless beacon of self-absorption
Wow...that's quite the review. It's sad to think that even this level of distain isn't going to stop her, or stop companies giving her money. I do hope that the FDA gets involved with her food, and that if she really isn't keeping track of money/orders/returns that the US version of Trading Standards gets involved. No doubt...it will all be someone else's fault.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 40
From the last thread. If people use a credit card to pay for an online purchase, there can be remediation via the CC company. You tell them you never received the product and show the receipt for the transaction. They do the investigation and if there are enough purchasers in the same situation, the company will have their CC business revoked. The fact that the company deposited the money, even if they can’t find your order, is enough reason for a refund.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 45
I remember the Audi fiasco quite well. The company wasn’t going to bow to her. They still continue to support polo. I went to a match locally, and the Audi banner was displayed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 40
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.