(From the last thread) QUOTE="Justhereforthedrama, post: 1637875, member: 32988"]
Actually that's a really good point. if she was 11 in 1993, she was 9 when the Rodney King riots happened. Not the summer before high school as she said in the Immaculate heart speech. Why lie on something so easy to prove?
Immaculate heart school starts at grade 6 - year 7 in the UK. When she was 11. In 1993. No where near the riots.
[/QUOTE]
Yep....exactly what some of us have been trying to point out since she shoved herself into the spotlight.
Very little of her dish soap advert narrative is true. She claims she was kept back at school because of the riots (she even describes ash floating to the ground) and while watching TV with classmates she was upset at a boy saying, “Yeah..washing up is women’s work’ when the advert came on.
So she wrinkled her little freckled nose (her words, I kid you not) when walking home, feeling the first, faint stirrings of feminism & Daddy Dearest told her to stand up for what she believed in, so she wrote to the First Lady, Hilary Clinton, famous feminist lawyer Gloria Aldred, a TV station (who sent a famous female TV anchor to interview her) and the advertising agency.
Thing is.....the riots were two years earlier, Hilary Clinton was not yet the First Lady, Gloria Aldred was still entirely unknown (the case that made her famous hadn’t happened yet) and some anonymous bloke talked to her for a kid’s TV show...no sign of a famous female news anchor.
And Daddy had nothing to do with it...and, actually, neither did she. It was homework set by the teacher. All the kids watched adverts in class and each of them were told to write a letter. SkidMarkle”s was the only one that garnered any attention - and it wasn’t even her idea.
But this isn’t the only lie she’s told. What about India? She was boasting in magazine articles that she’d been working really hard on setting up a ”girls’ program” in India (a place she’d never even visited at that point) - but the girls’ program she eventually visited for a couple of days was absolutely NOT set up by her and the woman who did start it had never even heard of Markle until a few days before she showed up for a photo shoot.
Everything out of that woman‘s mouth is either a lie or an exaggeration.
This is why I am convinced she has NPD. Narcissists don’t stop to think whether they’ll be believed or whether anyone will check - they spend not one second contemplating anyone other than themselves & think they are a) too unique and special to be doubted and b) that everyone else is stupid.
I don’t think I’ve ever disliked any public figure more & I find it impossible to believe that Harry isn’t desperately unhappy with her.
I mean - how bleeping shameful that a woman who hadn’t even married in yet had to be reprimanded by THE QUEEN for speaking to staff like tit. She’s a nasty, nasty piece of crap, lost in her own invented public image and willing to use anyone to her own advantage.