Harry and Meghan #2 Duke and Duchess of privacy

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Latest Blind Gossip (sorry can't link) saying they are being so secretive about Archie as they were holding out for a multimillion pound magazine deal - one million for charity, another secret million for them. Nothing to do with the baby's security. But too many people in high places found out and are highly disapproving so idea stopped or on hold 😲.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 12
Latest Blind Gossip (sorry can't link) saying they are being so secretive about Archie as they were holding out for a multimillion pound magazine deal - one million for charity, another secret million for them. Nothing to do with the baby's security. But too many people in high places found out and are highly disapproving so idea stopped or on hold 😲.
Wow, that would totally make sense I guess... 😲
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
She is a greedy, conniving witch.


Another one about MM. God. The more I read, the more I despise her. She played into Harry's vulnerabilities. https://blindgossip.com/family-distraught-over-her-control/#more-99163

COUPLE 2: He’s a very famous celebrity. Any woman would have considered him a great catch.

He was wealthy and came from an incredibly close-knit family. Loved his parents. His brother was his best friend. The family always gathered for traditional holiday celebrations and took sporty vacations together.

She is an actress. She grew up caring more about fame than family. But she told him that she loved how close he was to his family. She made him believe that she would be happy to be a part of that family.

However, once they became a couple… she began chipping away at his ties to his family.

Couldn’t he see how controlling they were? Couldn’t he see how they were still treating him like a child? Couldn’t he see that she was the only one who truly cared about him and treated him like a grown up? Couldn’t he see that spending time with her and her friends was so much better than the traditions he had with his family?

Over time, she has started to alienate him from his family. He is fighting with his brother. He is avoiding time with the rest of his family. His family is distraught, but there is little they can do. She has too much control over him.

Couple 2 is still together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Latest Blind Gossip (sorry can't link) saying they are being so secretive about Archie as they were holding out for a multimillion pound magazine deal - one million for charity, another secret million for them. Nothing to do with the baby's security. But too many people in high places found out and are highly disapproving so idea stopped or on hold 😲.
She thinks she’s so smart monetizing the monarchy, as if nobody but her could come up with that idea. She just doesn’t get that you don’t get to live in castles while working a maximum of half a day a week while being funded by tax payers AND monetize and merch your baby as if you weren’t tax payer funded. You can’t have it both ways Meg-Antoinette...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
I’m sure she’s just ensuring that nobody else can buy the domain names.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
She thinks she’s so smart monetizing the monarchy, as if nobody but her could come up with that idea. She just doesn’t get that you don’t get to live in castles while working a maximum of half a day a week while being funded by tax payers AND monetize and merch your baby as if you weren’t tax payer funded. You can’t have it both ways Meg-Antoinette...
Peter Philips sold wedding pictures to OK or Hello so the family just refused to be in those pictures. He’s not even a working royal and the family didn’t like it.

Does she really think she can monetise the baby and no one care? Put the funds in to the fake charity that’s actually registered as a business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Meghan has the rights for The Tig and Tigtots. Is she going to divorce Harry and start blogging again

Super tasteful to have a brand about kids with a reference to alcohol...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
What’s the reference to alcohol?
Meghan named her blog The Tig after her favourite wine, Tignanello.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
It was never meant to be a kid-centric blog, was it?

The TIG is a hub for the discerning palate – those with a hunger for food, travel, fashion & beauty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
It was never meant to be a kid-centric blog, was it?
Not when she was an actress trying to leverage her brand while on a cable show, but she just trademarked 'TigTots' which is obviously a branding pivot to kids...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Seems an extraordinarily petty criticism. Not only is the connection not at all obvious, children are aware that wine exists and generally without disastrous consequences.. Ok it might be very slightly weird to name a brand aimed at kids after a wine directly but who cares really ?! They’re far more likely to think of Tigger. And it’s a simple case of brand evolution, if she is doing anything with it at all, which doesn’t seem to have been confirmed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Seems an extraordinarily petty criticism. Not only is the connection not at all obvious, children are aware that wine exists and generally without disastrous consequences.. Ok it might be very slightly weird to name a brand aimed at kids after a wine directly but who cares really ?! They’re far more likely to think of Tigger. And it’s a simple case of brand evolution, if she is doing anything with it at all, which doesn’t seem to have been confirmed.
The reason I shared it was, I'm wondering if she's trying to keep the door open when she ditches Harry
 
Seems an extraordinarily petty criticism. Not only is the connection not at all obvious, children are aware that wine exists and generally without disastrous consequences.. Ok it might be very slightly weird to name a brand aimed at kids after a wine directly but who cares really ?! They’re far more likely to think of Tigger. And it’s a simple case of brand evolution, if she is doing anything with it at all, which doesn’t seem to have been confirmed.
That's fine, your perspective. I think it's a sign of poor branding and distasteful to have any association between children and alcohol. The association with tigger is also not something they can encourage given that is all tied up with Disney. The connection to her original name inspiration for the blog will always be there because the internet doesn't forget...

Plus, why does she need to keep up the brand trademark, let alone create a new children focused one? Unless, as @antisocialmedia mentioned, she's preparing for a possible divorce and post-royal brand renaissance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
That's fine, your perspective. I think it's a sign of poor branding and distasteful to have any association between children and alcohol. The association with tigger is also not something they can encourage given that is all tied up with Disney. The connection to her original name inspiration for the blog will always be there because the internet doesn't forget...

Plus, why does she need to keep up the brand trademark, let alone create a new children focused one? Unless, as @antisocialmedia mentioned, she's preparing for a possible divorce and post-royal brand renaissance.
Well it makes good business sense to keep the name, any marketing company would say the same. It’s an established brand and so is a cheat code in a sense.
More importantly I bet 99/100 people associate ‘the Tig’ with Meghan Markle, not with wine, not with with children, not with lifestyle blogging. The name is hers to do whatever she wants with (not addressing whether she should or not that’s a whole different discussion.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Well it makes good business sense to keep the name, any marketing company would say the same. It’s an established brand and so is a cheat code in a sense.
More importantly I bet 99/100 people associate ‘the Tig’ with Meghan Markle, not with wine, not with with children, not with lifestyle blogging. The name is hers to do whatever she wants with (not addressing whether she should or not that’s a whole different discussion.)
Why does it make business sense? Sophie proved having a job and being a working royal doesn't work because of conflicts of interest.
If Meghan and Harry are happily married and she'll be the DoS until the day she dies why does she need the branding for her blog to be renewed? She belongs to a new brand now - The Royal Family.
Moreover, why does she need to create an entirely new brand with TigTots? Her one and only focus should be representing the royal family well and serving the charities she is a patron of. That's the be-all and end-all of her role in life married to the 6th in line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.