Surely that handwritten thing can’t be considered as legally enforceable?! Especially when signed by a vulnerable young girl!From what I can gather Hayley has been told she has to pay damages for breaking the non disclosure agreement. Which kind of confirms he had sex with her then ??
I’m confused.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Haha that’s brilliant! Maybe we should all get together and do a none stop live? Say take it in turns every hour?
I don’t know because apparently Hayley has now had a panic attack and left the live
I can’t stomach the rees family at all they’re not my type just no
I think thats what people debating - she might be covered by the mental capacity act. Also it could be considering as blackmail, as I think he sent texts allegedly, basically threatening her to not say anything. There was an episode of can't pay we'll take it away where high court enforcement agents got sent to a house to claim a bill, but the person proved he was vulnerable/had mental health issues so they couldn't enforce the payment of it.
He's said something about 'Professor George Mason' retiring due to alleged sexual harassment, so maybe he's just making it seem like he has info on them so the solicitor has to watch?Hmm seems a bit suspect I think and like they're using it for the advantage of their channel. Hope they don't turn into the Wilkes
Watching now and trying to decide if I can be bothered to wait and hear about it at the end
Thank you to everyone posting updates from the Rees live!
Why does he keep going on about someone in Washington? I’m totally lost.
The guy has sexual harassment allegations against him, so I think thats the 'big reveal', but he's making it seem like he has info on Chris so the solicitor has to watch the whole thing.
Ha ha ha Creepy playing rugby. The only thing he’d be able to do on a rugby pitch is cheerleading. ( or perving on cheerleaders)
Who even ARE these Rees people and why are they allowing their child to swear live on YouTube?
They're one of the families that made a ton of videos when the original news broke. I think they were in that group that someone made (united for justice? or something) with the Wilkes fam, Greenwood, R fam/Angry Manc etc.
Yes that’s exactly what happened. It was a very very lame threat to try and persuade people not to post on here by who knows? Probably not a solicitor but someone who cut and paste a few bits and pieces from a solicitors website on defamation
Nah I think he'd quite like a bit of man on man action
So he’s the angry Manc guy? Wow he looks so different.
I know, my one great surprise in all of this is that the victims that have come forward are girls.
No Angry Manc is the dad from R family: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxxM1gs6aQ1PSMjFBhL2vvA
No he's not the angry Manc. The Angry Manc is from R Family. Dave Ravenscroft
This insta posted made me so angry she says she does it for the children but let's face it if you were 9 and you had the choice of staying at home or going to Australia what would you choose? I think most children would choose Australia.
Children have no concept of how Ill travelling can make you and why you need to have time to rest/relax, but Sarah and Chris as adults should know how important downtime is for children!
- Status