Gender Discussion #83 Thank you, For Women Scotland

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
My first thread creation, not sure what the etiquette is with starting new threads, so if I've trod on anyone's toes in doing so, I apologise whole heartedly and for my penance will educate myself so I can be stunning and brave in the future.

"My cat is blind and can't speak english and even he knows the difference between male and female."

A woman is born, not worn. Keep on TERFing witches!

ETA image & quote about the cat.

 
Last edited:
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 113
Maybe the outraged bleating from people refusing to accept the result will empower more of our media to be more vocal in support. I’d love a ‘why won’t they accept the truth’ headline, accompanied by a large picture of a bunch of ranting AGPs in full wig mode with their genitals straining against the lycra.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 66
A few things that I’m pondering this morning:

Will sporting records/medals be revised to reflect that a trans woman placing higher than a biological woman is an invalid result?

Will crime statistics be corrected where the perpetrator was a trans woman but the crime was reported/recorded as being committed by a woman?

Relatedly, will crime reporting now make clear in the headline/opening lines that the accused is a trans woman rather than a biological woman, rather than ‘respecting their gender identity’, which the BBC declared was their policy when I complained about their reporting on the Scarlet Blake case?

Will NHS publications for female-specific matters revert to ‘woman’ as opposed to ‘person with a cervix’/similar wording?

How long until other countries follow suit, now that precedent has been set? Yesterday’s ruling was headline news internationally, so the case was clearly being watched with interest across the world.

I’m sure many more issues will occur to me as the day goes on. Please do add any you think of.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 80
Baby steps. I'd personally be delighted to bin the term 'cis-gender' and condemn the she/her, they/them, he/him in work signatures to the bottom of the bad fire.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 116
For any new thread followers I have a handy guide to remembering TIF and TIM. TIF is a Trans Identifying Female-(TIffany) eg Elliot Page.
TIM is a Trans Identifying Male (Timothy)
Eg one of the hundreds of thousands you'll come across on your journey like Himdia WillyBoy or Sophie Molly.

Some people like to use trans woman to mean a TIM but as we all know there's really no such thing.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 47
I'm so proud of TERF Island and the amazing women we owe a debt of gratitude to.

For Women Scotland
Women's Declaration International
Maya Forstater
Magdalen Berns ❤
Sandie Peggie and the Darlington Nurses
Dr Hilary Cass
JK Rowling
Rosie Duffield
Keira Bell

And many more I've forgotten to list
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 82
Relatedly, will crime reporting now make clear in the headline/opening lines that the accused is a trans woman rather than a biological woman, rather than ‘respecting their gender identity’, which the BBC declared was their policy when I complained about their reporting on the Scarlet Blake case?

Will NHS publications for female-specific matters revert to ‘woman’ as opposed to ‘person with a cervix’/similar wording?

How long until other countries follow suit, now that precedent has been set? the day goes on. Please do add any you think of.
In response to your comments.

1) As I stated yesterday, the BBC has never been on the side of biological women throughout this. They have always pandered to the Trans community and non binary element.

No doubt they will try to backpedal on their previous stance. However, I still have no time for the BBC. An 'impartial' organisation that always seems to end up choosing to back the wrong side of a topic. When as a supposed 'impartial' organisation, it should not be taking any side at all!

2) Does this mean that ridiculous terms such as 'chest feeding' and 'person with a uterus', will revert back to their proper terminology?

3) In a way Trump has been somewhat responsible for this. Yes, he is a divisive figure, and I disagree with much of his policy. However, on the gender issue he had taken proactive steps to reverse this madness, with the Government there only legally recognising two genders. Reversing much of the BS woke gender policy that was waved through under Biden.

What i would also like to know is will the likes of Kathleen Stock be receiving an apology from The University of Sussex. Plus Kathleen and others who were 'de-platformed' from various venues across the country for holding legally recognised views.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 64
A few things that I’m pondering this morning:

Will sporting records/medals be revised to reflect that a trans woman placing higher than a biological woman is an invalid result?

Will crime statistics be corrected where the perpetrator was a trans woman but the crime was reported/recorded as being committed by a woman?

Relatedly, will crime reporting now make clear in the headline/opening lines that the accused is a trans woman rather than a biological woman, rather than ‘respecting their gender identity’, which the BBC declared was their policy when I complained about their reporting on the Scarlet Blake case?

Will NHS publications for female-specific matters revert to ‘woman’ as opposed to ‘person with a cervix’/similar wording?

How long until other countries follow suit, now that precedent has been set? Yesterday’s ruling was headline news internationally, so the case was clearly being watched with interest across the world.

I’m sure many more issues will occur to me as the day goes on. Please do add any you think of.
Yes and when will bloody Girlguiding rescind their harmful policies of placing TIM in the same dorms as young girls / teens (and not even telling parents about this).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: 69
I'm so happy for our young women. Universities are all so captured. My daughters uni has those godawful ignore-all-your-instincts signs in the loos essentially telling them their own eyes can't be trusted and he knows better than you about how they mustn't run their naughty little mouths if there's a hulking big hairy arse male in there startling them. Y'kno the one about if someone appears to be using the wrong facilities you mustn't say anything or stare cos he knows better than you. That tit.

I imagine they'll be coming down now.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 63
Women’s hour have covered The Supreme Court ruling. A 15 minute segment … with Joshua Rosenberg 🤦‍♀️
 
  • Angry
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 17
Yes and when will bloody Girlguiding rescind their harmful policies of placing TIM in the same dorms as young girls / teens (and not even telling parents about this).
This has just prompted me to check the Scouts website, as my child is a Scout:
IMG_5858.png

I'm actually aghast that these organisations haven’t immediately taken down these pages in light of yesterday’s ruling. Can we find more? I’m tempted to email.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Heart
Reactions: 50
I'm so happy for our young women. Universities are all so captured. My daughters uni has those godawful ignore-all-your-instincts signs in the loos essentially telling them their own eyes can't be trusted and he knows better than you about how they mustn't run their naughty little mouths if there's a hulking big hairy arse male in there startling them. Y'kno the one about if someone appears to be using the wrong facilities you mustn't say anything or stare cos he knows better than you. That tit.

I imagine they'll be coming down now.
A lot of this gender madness can be squarely pointed at the education sector.

It has been promoted by, enforced upon, with opposion views shouted down by various figures within the sector.

They are there to teach, not force their uber batshit ideals onto others. Many are guilty of indoctrination of young minds and should be sacked.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 49
A few things that I’m pondering this morning:

Will sporting records/medals be revised to reflect that a trans woman placing higher than a biological woman is an invalid result?

Will crime statistics be corrected where the perpetrator was a trans woman but the crime was reported/recorded as being committed by a woman?

Relatedly, will crime reporting now make clear in the headline/opening lines that the accused is a trans woman rather than a biological woman, rather than ‘respecting their gender identity’, which the BBC declared was their policy when I complained about their reporting on the Scarlet Blake case?

Will NHS publications for female-specific matters revert to ‘woman’ as opposed to ‘person with a cervix’/similar wording?

How long until other countries follow suit, now that precedent has been set? Yesterday’s ruling was headline news internationally, so the case was clearly being watched with interest across the world.

I’m sure many more issues will occur to me as the day goes on. Please do add any you think of.
I'd add to that will "first woman to do X" be revised if a transwoman was the first to do it
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 32
The handmaiden's are really out in force on my social media today. I don't get it. Actually, I do - we're conditioned to seek male approval as we believe it will confer acceptance and safety.

I'm really glad I found community with other Terfy women behind the scenes, I've struck up true lifelong friendships with these women who do not center men. I find male-centerd women harder to trust nowadays, and today's fawning reminded me why.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 60
I’ve recently shifted into an extremely woke, arts industry sector and I keep an instagram for work purposes.

duck me it is CRAZY on there this morning. It’s all “if you support yesterdays ruling by the Supreme Court, please remove yourself from my followers”, “trans rights have always been a feminist issue, from abortion to transition, they’re two sides of the same coin” (wut?), “Company X (allegedly a “women focused” organisation) stands with our trans sisters agains this dangerous ruling and will always provide a safe place for you to be your selves”.

I cannot believe how quick these people, mostly very young women but not exclusively, are to throw women under the bus like this, even where their purpose is ostensibly to support women. It’s maddening. I need to take a big old step back from social media, it’s making me like people so much less.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Heart
Reactions: 71
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.