FriendlyFirstFoods

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts

And_that's_okay!

Excuse me? She is helping us actually....

Realise we're not as much of a twat and have better lives than her

What my kids eat in a day....new video.....get the frozen mash out kids.
 
Reactions: 3

And_that's_okay!

yyyyiiii said:
I don’t understand those journals.
Click to expand...
Why is she capturing that she eat doughnuts and a Sainsbury's receipt???? Those junk-style journals aren't meant to be full of meaningless shite. Half-term and she wants nostalgia over a fucking supermarket receipt. Lord give me strength.

This is what she's trying to do but failing miserably.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Reactions: 4
G

Gossngiggles

I find it hilarious that they try and act hard done by.

Nobody made you share photos of your sick kid on the toilet hun, you chose to do that yourself and that was the first time anyone really gave a shit about your Instagram. Before that you were only really mentioned when it was to do with Charlotte on the thread you seemingly can’t stop reading.
 
Reactions: 6
M

MardieT

Definitely the right thing to do. Those poor kids have had their privacy invaded for too long. A teacher putting a photo online of their 4 year old on the toilet
But of course all the weirdos out there looking for photos of children is not the reason she is taking their photos off Instagram it’s because somebody said something mean about her
 
Reactions: 7

Noseybatch

2 pages of a tattle thread and she got sense. If only all the family vloggers responded as quick.
 
Reactions: 8
L

Lilyofthevalley80

To be honest - not such a “hard” decision for FFF as she doesn’t get ads etc really? What would Charlotte do without the talent? I mean how much money can a “weird” dog make you?!
 
Reactions: 4

Noseybatch

Lilyofthevalley80 said:
To be honest - not such a “hard” decision for FFF as she doesn’t get ads etc really? What would Charlotte do without the talent? I mean how much money can a “weird” dog make you?!
Click to expand...
Exactly, she can still get her free food meals gusto?! Without the use of the children
 
Reactions: 2
G

Gossngiggles

Lilyofthevalley80 said:
To be honest - not such a “hard” decision for FFF as she doesn’t get ads etc really? What would Charlotte do without the talent? I mean how much money can a “weird” dog make you?!
Click to expand...
Yeah her account won’t really take a hit because it’s pretty small and the free bits she gets aren’t about her kids anyway.
 

And_that's_okay!

The fact she shared them anyway tells me this women gives no shits about their ability to consent nor their anonymity. A teacher? What does she teach? Just goes to show absolutely anyone could be teaching our kids

Crazy what people think its okay to share online. I hope her child safeguarding training is up-to-date.

I'm not applauding her for this. She's still a person who lacks a decent moral code.
 
Reactions: 5
B

Beakytoo

Charlotte will be At least she has acted on negative feedback - not trolling!!!
 
Reactions: 1

And_that's_okay!

* my post from the Charlotte Taylor thread (as applies to both)

For fuck sake, this is getting ridiculous between these two now. They're at it again guys.

It was only a couple of days that FFF (aka Kayleigh) said she was no longer showing her kids online. A bold and perhaps brave decision. She's made her voice heard; she doesn't want her kids online anymore.

What does frenemy Charlotte do? POST A PHOTO OF HER (FFF) WITH A CHILD ONLINE!!!!!!

Now I know this isn't Kayleigh's child but still, Charlotte has totally gone against Kayleigh's wishes against posting children's pics online.

It's obvious. It's cruel. It's grotesque. If my friend said they didn't want to post kids online I then wouldn't then (days later) post them holding a child.

Charlotte is manipulative. She's not right in the head. I really don't get this "friendship". They're constantly trying to screw one another over. Kayleigh has said she's not posting kids online anymore, deleted all photos with kids but it's okay, Charlotte will do it for her.
 

Attachments

Reactions: 4
M

MardieT

Has anybody watched her latest YouTube video about why she took her kids faces off her social media. Apparently somebody messaged her to say she had her own thread on tattle she forgot to mention that she reads her “best friends” tattle thread every day. I totally get she would be upset by comments made on here about her kids but I would say on the most part people on here just found it disgusting that a mum (and teacher!!) would post photos of their poorly child sat on the toilet for thousands of people to see.
 
Reactions: 9
S

snickerdoodle

Came here to say this!!

However, seeing as she quite obviously reads here, I will say this:

Hi Kayley. My respect for you has grown since you made this decision and I no longer have a problem with you, and will happily watch your meal plans. My main problem with instamums is their lack of respect for their childrens privacy and their total disregard for safeguarding, so apart from the odd little gossip here (which is no different to you picking up a copy of Heat magazine) I really don’t feel the need to say anything negative. You’ve done the right thing.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 7
G

Gossngiggles

Lol she is all over the site, we know she is because she has reacted to things on here so quickly. I get that it isn’t nice being spoken about on here but it’s so hypocritical to slay tattle off when it is so blatant that you also read/post on here. I think loads of the instamums are probably on here but they are just better at hiding it.

It’s great that she has chosen to not show her children anymore, I’m glad for her kids but I’m not sure why it is needing dedicated Instagram posts and videos to tell us all about it, she isn’t some huge influencer, just do it without the big song and dance. Anyone would think she is loving the attention
 
Reactions: 6

skylark13

Have to say fair dues to Kayley for explaining her stance on no longer showing her kids online. I thought that video was very thoughtful - made clear she isn’t saying others should do same as her. And also has clearly given some actual brainpower to concept of consent, which is more than you can say for our best frenemy Charl.
 
M

MardieT

Surely as a teacher and as somebody running a page named “friendly first foods” you should know that mini eggs are a choking hazard? I’ve seen it all over Facebook over the Easter period
 
Reactions: 6
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…