You can argue the use classes are too wide and/or the use doesn’t fall within what’s covered and so there’s no real infringement. There also needs to be a likelihood of confusion for there to be an infringement. Are people really going to be confused when it’s an article about Fleur East? I don’t think so. You could easily argue that there’s been no infringement here.She has the trademarks.
Search for a trade mark - Intellectual Property Office
trademarks.ipo.gov.uk
Having a trademark isn’t a blanket ban on anyone using the word/phrase in any context, anywhere, ever again, which some here seem to be suggesting.