Because they aren't allowed. Counting cannot begin until polls close at the final EU country to vote.What I don't get is why haven't they counted all the UK ones by now, they've had days to do it
I thought about that but then how have they managed to count all of Wales and west midlands in an hour and a half?Because they aren't allowed. Counting cannot begin until polls close at the final EU country to vote.
If we counted before then, there is a chance that information is leaked, which could influence other countries and how they vote.
Not every country votes on Thursday. The majority I believe hold votes on Sundays (which makes sense imo).
Because of population density in those areas. Less people, less to count, but they also get less seats per region.I thought about that but then how have they managed to count all of Wales and west midlands in an hour and a half?
I find the banning of discussing even the voting on TV and radio really outdated now we have the internet, as if some callers on lbc would affect the votes in other countries
Still seems a bit quick to have counted so many votes compared to a GE, even though there's less. Maybe they started counting early evening?Because of population density in those areas. Less people, less to count, but they also get less seats per region.
Small turnouts is also a factor. Only 27% of eligible people voted in my area, which is a much smaller proportion than in a general election.Still seems a bit quick to have counted so many votes compared to a GE, even though there's less. Maybe they started counting early evening?
Tory's heading towards 5th place and still a very divided country. It's just going towards a no deal now if no one can decide.
I don't think as you say its so simpleI think anyone who thinks it’s a victory for anti Brexit is kidding themselves tbh and the adding up the parties thing is spin, as it excludes tribal votes for LibDems, Conservative who are a self declared Brexit party and the section of Lab who face towards Brexit. There was more motivation for remainers to vote who want to be in the EU, than Brexiteers who don’t. Those percentage tables are comparing No Deal with remain. If it goes to second referendum the true indication is we will vote leave again.
I don’t think that many people voted for ‘Farage’, I think that’s an over simplification of the issue.I can't believe that many people voted for Farage.
I totally get why a lot of people voted for the Brexit party, as they voted with the thought they would then deliver Brexit, but I still can't imagine voting to put Farage in a position of power. I'm sure he was trying to get Brexit to happen as quickly as possible instead of trying to get the best deal (which as much as I dislike May as well, she seemed to be trying to do), which imo could be catastrophic.I don’t think that many people voted for ‘Farage’, I think that’s an over simplification of the issue.
You have a bunch of people who were probably loyal Tory or labour whom felt their party no longer represented them. Within that you probably had leave voters whom felt they were not getting the democracy they were entitled to with regards to brexit. Remain voters who value the democratic system. And some in between who voted as a protest. They voted brexit party.
Then you have those who left labour/conservatives to vote Lib Dem/green etc. And those who stayed loyal.
I think a minority actually voted with the mind set of wanting Farage himself in a position of power.
Love him or hate him, ‘he’s’ just stormed an election with a 6 week old party that has no manifesto. I didn’t vote brexit party, but I understand the reasonings for why people did. I personally think when we get to a point where we start belittling people for the way they voted, you are going to end up with more issues that before.