Exactly…! I buy a couple of her products because I like them. It’s def not beside of her and her social Media. I’ll still buy them- the times piece won’t change that. Truthfully, I think releasing the transcript makes her sound even more unhinged than the article. she thinks she comes across as cool and knowledgable but the manic behaviour and chaotic style just isn’t appreciated by many’s
The journo def tried to come across as her best friend and stitched her up in that respect. Shes an over sharer and the journo took advantage of that and did a hatchet job based on her own opinion of Davinia which isn’t hard to understand.,, Davinia just didn’t like her take. It’s a two way conversation the journo didn’t have to do a PR job for her.. and that’s the part that Davinia is raging about.
It’s like going on a date, spending a night with someone and thinking you had a real connection and that it went really well and you’ll meet again. On the other hand the other person - said it was a one night stand, you both enjoyed it for what it was and no interest in meeting again.
QUOTE="PineappleQueen19, post: 21685248, member: 28062"]
She does generally come across as unhinged though, can’t blame the writer for capturing her accurately
And it’s not like Davinia presents herself as calm, rational and professional on her own social media. In fact she seems to embrace a kind of “if you don’t like me warts and all then
duck off” approach, why would the paper contradict that. What was she expecting, a flattering puff piece about her book and products? You don’t get that for free in The Times
[/QUOTE]