More like she is the sad one with no life, proof being, she puts it all on the internet! Boring A.F.As usual she has exaggerated what is on the parody account. It said biscuits not cake and barely mentions her eyebrows but of course they have been mentioned loads in this thread. She just can’t stop reading here. Says we’re sad with no life yet she’s obsessed with reading what is said about her
there is no agenda!!! stop using language like this it makes you look homophobic...She has also just admitted she DOES push the LGBTQ+ agenda on her children!!!
Ah but she can't let the sheep know about that, they might judge her or turn into "trolls"!The fact that this woman takes more offence to a comment about her EYEBROWS than the fact her children’s images are on PORN sites says it all.
From the former Teacher!“Formally proud of”? You mean formerly Emma!
I had a feeling it might have been on Facebook because of the way the likes and loves were xShe took a pic of the persons front room wonder if they knew or mind ? Weird
I think it was messages from fb messenger as there is a person with that name on fb
I was merely writing exactly what Emma herself said in her post so please calm down, nor am I the one who started the term “agenda” on here.there is no agenda!!! stop using language like this it makes you look homophobic...
Can the person who found out this was the case confirm this??Do we know for sure there are images of her kids being used innapropriately? Cos if this is the case fact then surely something else can be done???!!! There must be someone/somewhere to report it too? I fear that this is going to replicate the Meldrum saga with 'Lift Gate' where Brummy will refuse and refuse to acknowledge this huge massive error in judgment and it'll be the demise of her channel and brand before she owns up and puts things right!!!!!
If you read back through this thread there’s a screenshot xCan the person who found out this was the case confirm this??
I agree with you to an extent but a lot of them would not put their 7yo daughter doing boomerangs in her cossie I’m sorry but that’s a whole other level. What an absolute tit show of parenting these two dummies put on (Stephen included)This whole “mummy influencer” thing absolutely stinks. They are all guilty of literally selling their children for money/attention. It’s horrific. The fact that images are being used in this way is just the tip of the iceberg but what do they expect to happen? The internet is a lawless and vastly unregulated, there’s nothing stopping anyone from downloading and saving images of kids that these idiots post. There will no doubt be loads of creepy monsters out there with back catalogues full of images of these kids (Brummys and all the others)
They are not ignorant to this side of the internet. They simply put money and attention above the safety and privacy of their children. They sweep it under the carpet and try to justify it to themselves that what they are doing is ok - that it’s just the same as kids being child actors or child models. But it’s not.
@bsw123 here you go x*The thumbnail below doesn't show any nudity etc, but be warned it's still got links and descriptions of porn site visible*
This is just one of the sites that comes up when you reverse image search the photo she loves when she's doing her "just get in your swimsuit and live your life" type posts. Her and both children. Obviously haven't clicked the link, but you can see from the SEO tags what type of person it's trying to attract, and I very much doubt it's the people looking at the "chubby saggy" headline. At some point that photo that she loves to post so much has appeared on that site with those tags attached to it. She needs to have a bleeping word with herself.
View attachment 29080
I don’t understand this who has an agenda I’m blaming my confusion on the heatthere is no agenda!!! stop using language like this it makes you look homophobic...
I’m not clicking the link, but it’s pretty obviously used on multiple sites. I’ve only done one screenshot as the others have more extreme website names / titles etc and really it shouldn’t matter how many it’s on the fact it’s on any should repulse her.Can the person who found out this was the case confirm this??