The timing of Carlz and Ann’s big troll reveal, is hilarious. We all know by now about the Irish Courtcase against the owner of Tattle. And as a result, influencers in UK and Australia seem to think that suddenly the identities of their anonymous online critics will, somehow, be revealed.
The thing is despite saying that she never talks about “it” (she does. At least 2 x year she’ll do a pile of stories about her critics) and extolling her audience about how they’d have no idea about what she’s going thru behind the scenes (because she “never posts about it”) she’s been saying nearly theee years now that she got “people on it”; and she’s been collecting information on her critics for years.
It was during her very slurry live, maybe two years ago?, that she said that she was sure it was her high school frenemies that were her biggest tattle critics.
As always - she finds it difficult to keep track of her lies. Has she had PIs in the case for three years? Or the last few months? If she’s had access to the isagenix playbook to shut things down, why is she only following it now.
I completely do not buy the “we are having babies this year so I want to out everyone now . Which, as an aside, if she doesn’t want anyone saying anything about her future children, DONT PUT THEM ON THE bleeping INTERNET. Or if you just want to share them with friends and family, have a private friend and family IG. See?? Sorted??
She’s just jumping on the collective post Sands/Tattle court case media attention - which has already died right down - hoping to gain some traction and scare people off tattle. And while initially, tattle numbers dropped, and people deleted their accounts, have you looked recently at how many people (registered members and guests) are now on? All these influencers talking about tattle has just seen viewer numbers boom.
I’ve no doubt that all the Aussie Influencers with tattle threads have joined a group chat … but I also guarantee that engagement within the group chat has dwindled and it’s just left to a few stragglers using the same playbook of threats, reveals, meta data, and attempts at shaming people.
She’s got nothing either on people’s identities or to pursue “things” legally. There’s a number of things that may good solicitor would have advised her to do - and not do. And from what I can see, she’s not doing (and is doing) anything that she would have been advised to.
And each little bit of breadcrumbing she’s doing just proves it.