Alexandra Ryan Goss.ie itsalirose

[Kellso2001]

Some tweets don’t age well. I’m told this was directed at the woman who eventually stumbled upon her video. 2 months before it was discovered. Looks like there’s more to this than meets the eye.

 

[dalau]

So: She says she’s worried how it might affect a relationship if it ever gets released, and that other people have seen it. And she’s been blackmailed by someone who wasn’t the filmer. I dunno that I follow.

 

[I got up at 5am]

I thought this already came in with Coco’s Law last year?

 

[Jellybb]

I thought this already came in with Coco’s Law last year?

Same
I don’t understand why she’s suddenly taken on the role of the face of this campaign.. I thought it was the mother of that poor girl that died who spearheaded that campaign?

 

[dalau]

I just reread her account for about the fourth time and it’s completely clear. She claims that the video was shared, twice, but it’s apparent that it wasn’t. Again, not to discount the unpleasantness she has actually experienced, but it does seem she has seen an opportunity in this DoJ campaign to inflate her profile, and the grandiosity and OMG you guys thank you for having me on affect sound some strange, unserious and occasionally barking mad notes.

 

[rantingqueen]

So: She says she’s worried how it might affect a relationship if it ever gets released, and that other people have seen it. And she’s been blackmailed by someone who wasn’t the filmer. I dunno that I follow.

It’s a bit of a disjointed story. Seems to keep changing.

 

[dalau]

“A very important moment in my life.”

 

[Justpeeking]

Some tweets don’t age well. I’m told this was directed at the woman who eventually stumbled upon her video. 2 months before it was discovered. Looks like there’s more to this than meets the eye.

There’s a massive difference between posting something like this and tageting and taunting someone over a video of them filmed without their consent

seriously - they may not have liked each other but that doesn’t give the right for that woman to terrorise her in the way she did

if someone posted something negative about a man who raped her would you be so fast as to come on ans say there’s more to this than meets the eye

regardless of what happened-she was filmed without her knowledge and then terrorised -nothing else matters

 

[dalau]

There’s a massive difference between posting something like this and tageting and taunting someone over a video of them filmed without their consent

seriously - they may not have liked each other but that doesn’t give the right for that woman to terrorise her in the way she did

if someone posted something negative about a man who raped her would you be so fast as to come on ans say there’s more to this than meets the eye

regardless of what happened-she was filmed without her knowledge and then terrorised -nothing else matters

The story is so self-contradictory at this point that while I’m sure there is truth to it, there seems to be quite a lot of fantasy too.

Given the apparent squeakiness of her claims re the circulation [i.e. non-circulation] of the footage, and her characterisation of what she experiences as revenge porn [which without circulation, this is not], it’s hard not to doubt how badly she was baited by this shadowy girlfriend or troubled by the baiting.

What is in no doubt is her sense of what this means in her thirsty world. I listened to the NT interview and was struck by how she sounded like she believed she was making her debut as a celebrity (issue based), as she has on her socials, and like an unconvincing moral crusader. The tone was and is all over the place.

Same
I don’t understand why she’s suddenly taken on the role of the face of this campaign.. I thought it was the mother of that poor girl that died who spearheaded that campaign?

Typical case of civil servants getting steered by some privately schooled wombat with a marketing degree. Coco’s mum was put up for the passing of the law, Goss.ie CEO and founder, alleged serial rapist supporter and alleged survivorfluencer Ali Ryan for the hotline.

 

[Kellso2001]

There’s a massive difference between posting something like this and tageting and taunting someone over a video of them filmed without their consent

seriously - they may not have liked each other but that doesn’t give the right for that woman to terrorise her in the way she did

if someone posted something negative about a man who raped her would you be so fast as to come on ans say there’s more to this than meets the eye

regardless of what happened-she was filmed without her knowledge and then terrorised -nothing else matters

How do you know she was terrorized? You are taking what she is saying as gospel.
This is someone who alters the images of almost every photo and is liberal with the truth. Where is the proof that she was terrorized? The piece itself was clearly a hatchet job on the woman with no emphasis on what the man did which in my opinion was far worse. To me it sounds like the woman called her in anger and probably mouthed off about it but there’s no proof that this was shared. In her piece she even said the women called her to say there was no tape. It seems the video is nowhere in existence and I think it’s fair to assume it would be if it was shared. It’s a dangerous path to go down playing judge and jury without facts.

 

[rantingqueen]

How do you know she was terrorized? You are taking what she is saying as gospel.
This is someone who alters the images of almost every photo and is liberal with the truth. Where is the proof that she was terrorized? The piece itself was clearly a hatchet job on the woman with no emphasis on what the man did which in my opinion was far worse. To me it sounds like the woman called her in anger and probably mouthed off about it but there’s no proof that this was shared. In her piece she even said the women called her to say there was no tape. It seems the video is nowhere in existence and I think it’s fair to assume it would be if it was shared. It’s a dangerous path to go down playing judge and jury without facts.

Do you think if she really had screenshots of tweets, she wouldn’t share them & block out the name? Not a chance she’d keep that private.

 

[Justpeeking]

How do you know she was terrorized? You are taking what she is saying as gospel.
This is someone who alters the images of almost every photo and is liberal with the truth. Where is the proof that she was terrorized? The piece itself was clearly a hatchet job on the woman with no emphasis on what the man did which in my opinion was far worse. To me it sounds like the woman called her in anger and probably mouthed off about it but there’s no proof that this was shared. In her piece she even said the women called her to say there was no tape. It seems the video is nowhere in existence and I think it’s fair to assume it would be if it was shared. It’s a dangerous path to go down playing judge and jury without facts.

She was videoed without consent. Someone other than her and the piece of sh*t that videoed her saw it.
Whether it was shared or not or whether she embellished about how much she was terrorised those are still facts

I don’t even know or care who she is-I came across this thread when I googled her.

whatever you want to rip her apart on is fine but the facts remain unchanged and I cannot imagine the absolute horror or realizing you had been filmed without consent at your most vulnerable

 

[rantingqueen]

She was videoed without consent. Someone other than her and the piece of sh*t that videoed her saw it.
Whether it was shared or not or whether she embellished about how much she was terrorised those are still facts

I don’t even know or care who she is-I came across this thread when I googled her.

whatever you want to rip her apart on is fine but the facts remain unchanged and I cannot imagine the absolute horror or realizing you had been filmed without consent at your most vulnerable

Which has repeatedly been acknowledged. It was a terrible breach of trust and privacy BUT that’s where it ends. The video was never circulated, she knows that. A tiny handful of people knew, and it’s a pure lie to say a newspaper threatened to expose it. Literally nobody knew who she was. Nobody would have cared.

 

[Jellybb]

Which has repeatedly been acknowledged. It was a terrible breach of trust and privacy BUT that’s where it ends. The video was never circulated, she knows that. A tiny handful of people knew, and it’s a pure lie to say a newspaper threatened to expose it. Literally nobody knew who she was. Nobody would have cared.

I agree. She defo exaggerated things. I can’t see why a newspaper would threaten to expose a random girls sex tape

 

[Transparency]

I agree. She defo exaggerated things. I can’t see why a newspaper would threaten to expose a random girls sex tape

And with the number of blackmail attempts surely someone would have been questioned or charged with this.

 

[rantingqueen]

I agree. She defo exaggerated things. I can’t see why a newspaper would threaten to expose a random girls sex tape

Nah they definitely wouldn’t. There’s just no way. Imagine how bad that would be for the newspapers reputation? Irish tabloids are nothing like the ones in UK. And again, she was just a random girl.

And with the number of blackmail attempts surely someone would have been questioned or charged with this.

Absolutely. Blackmail is illegal & the guards would have investigated.

 

[Jellybb]

And with the number of blackmail attempts surely someone would have been questioned or charged with this.

Exactly! I don’t know if she implied the newspaper threatened to expose it because she wants to be seen as a celebrity? Because she ain’t! So that’s why I would have trouble believing

 

[thrillhouse1]

She was videoed without consent. Someone other than her and the piece of sh*t that videoed her saw it.
Whether it was shared or not or whether she embellished about how much she was terrorised those are still facts

I don’t even know or care who she is-I came across this thread when I googled her.

whatever you want to rip her apart on is fine but the facts remain unchanged and I cannot imagine the absolute horror or realizing you had been filmed without consent at your most vulnerable

‘When I googled her’

you clearly know her personally

 

[rantingqueen]

Why is she acting like this legislation is down to her? It was in law when she wrote her fantasy column.

I didn’t see one article about the girl who inspired the law, or her mother. It’s all about yer wan who thinks she’s Elle Woods.

 

[Justpeeking]

‘When I googled her’

you clearly know her personally

Yes I joined 2 years ago and posted on numerous other posts just lying in wait to defend her
This is certainly more plausible than me having an opinion differing to yours