Depending on the kind of job you apply, most graduate schemes still ask for this I guess but some have got rid of it. Also A-level result will dictate the kind of universities they do to, is quite different doing law in UWE and Bristol.I mean given the awful two academic years the kids have had, the least that can be done is getting them into the university of their choice.
Do future employers REALLY look at A level results on a CV. I don’t think my college results have had any impact on me getting a job
But what if they have got higher grades than they would’ve done normally? If they get into a course they would have not got into without the increase of grades then they may struggle with the uni course?I mean given the awful two academic years the kids have had, the least that can be done is getting them into the university of their choice.
Do future employers REALLY look at A level results on a CV. I don’t think my college results have had any impact on me getting a job
Exactly, they count towards the next stepping stone so indirectly matter a fair bit.Also A-level result will dictate the kind of universities they do to, is quite different doing law in UWE and Bristol.
I think interviewing more applicants might be a way to get around this (obviously too late for this year). I know Oxbridge interview everyone and so do some courses like medicine and dentistry, but the majority of students aren't interviewed. This would give both the academics and the students a proper chance to decide if the course and uni is really the right fit for them.But what if they have got higher grades than they would’ve done normally? If they get into a course they would have not got into without the increase of grades then they may struggle with the uni course?
The reason Oxbridge interviews work is because they have a college system, so it’s not really having a major impact on all of the teaching staff. The only other university who could maybe make that work is Durham as they also have a college system but it’s run differently so that’s unlikelyI think interviewing more applicants might be a way to get around this (obviously too late for this year). I know Oxbridge interview everyone and so do some courses like medicine and dentistry, but the majority of students aren't interviewed. This would give both the academics and the students a proper chance to decide if the course and uni is really the right fit for them.
I don’t see the issue in unis offering places to people they don’t think will get in? Because what if they do get the grades to get in. I know someone who didn’t apply for a top uni because they didn’t think they’d get the results, they did so they ended up going through clearing and got into a much better uni than they originally planned to go. This was before covid. They have to offer these places in my opinion because some who are expected to get in won’t and others are who aren’t expected will. Someone else I know well before covid was predicted CCC and got AAAHonestly I don’t see the issue apart from uni places but I think that speaks more for how our application process works and the fact that unis hand out places to people they don’t expect to get in
There’s been some talk of students cheating but the majority of that would be for basic facts (the memory side of things). At A levels everything is about applying those facts and that’s where a lot of people fall short, so no amount of cheating or notes will help them if they can’t apply their information properly and write about it.
The reason Oxbridge interviews work is because they have a college system, so it’s not really having a major impact on all of the teaching staff. The only other university who could maybe make that work is Durham as they also have a college system but it’s run differently so that’s unlikely
I think that’s the reason students have open days and post-offer days but this year many of them didn’t run properly
I had an interview at Manchester (a few years ago now) which is one of the biggest UK universities in terms of number of undergrads. They were interviewing a huge number of applicants for the course I applied for and related courses, which is clearly a lot of work on their part but they made a point of saying they found it beneficial in the long run because students who are accepted and decide to go have much more realistic expectations than just from the open days.The reason Oxbridge interviews work is because they have a college system, so it’s not really having a major impact on all of the teaching staff. The only other university who could maybe make that work is Durham as they also have a college system but it’s run differently so that’s unlikely
I think that’s the reason students have open days and post-offer days but this year many of them didn’t run properly
Which is why there’s a whole argument to run the application process after students have received their results. Obviously at this point that’s a lot of work and a massive headache, but when you give students a more favourable, and I’d argue realistic, exam process it seems to make sense.I don’t see the issue in unis offering places to people they don’t think will get in? Because what if they do get the grades to get in. I know someone who didn’t apply for a top uni because they didn’t think they’d get the results, they did so they ended up going through clearing and got into a much better uni than they originally planned to go. This was before covid. They have to offer these places in my opinion because some who are expected to get in won’t and others are who aren’t expected will. Someone else I know well before covid was predicted CCC and got AAA
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?